Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Very Elderly Patients: Advantages and Specific Problems.

CIED arrhythmic monitoring cardiac implantable electronic devices hemodynamic monitoring remote monitoring

Journal

Journal of cardiovascular development and disease
ISSN: 2308-3425
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Dev Dis
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101651414

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 06 05 2024
revised: 24 06 2024
accepted: 27 06 2024
medline: 26 7 2024
pubmed: 26 7 2024
entrez: 26 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) offer the benefit of remote monitoring and decision making and find particular applications in special populations such as the elderly. Less transportation, reduced costs, prompt diagnosis, a sense of security, and continuous real-time monitoring are the main advantages. On the other hand, less physician-patient interactions and the technology barrier in the elderly pose specific problems in remote monitoring. CIEDs nowadays are abundant and are mostly represented by rhythm control/monitoring devices, whereas hemodynamic remote monitoring devices are gaining popularity and are evolving and becoming refined. Future directions include the involvement of artificial intelligence, yet disparities of availability, lack of follow-up data, and insufficient patient education are still areas to be improved. This review aims to describe the role of CIED in the very elderly and highlight the merits and possible drawbacks.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39057629
pii: jcdd11070209
doi: 10.3390/jcdd11070209
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Roberto Scacciavillani (R)

Department of Cardiovascular & Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Leonidas Koliastasis (L)

First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University, "Hippokration" Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Ioannis Doundoulakis (I)

First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University, "Hippokration" Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Sotirios Chiotis (S)

First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University, "Hippokration" Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Athanasios Kordalis (A)

First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University, "Hippokration" Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Maria Lucia Narducci (ML)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Cardiology Unit, Cardiothoracic Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Santa Maria della Misericordia, 33100 Udine, Italy.

Sotiris Kotoulas (S)

First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University, "Hippokration" Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Gaetano Pinnacchio (G)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Gianluigi Bencardino (G)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Francesco Perna (F)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Gianluca Comerci (G)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Konstantinos A Gatzoulis (KA)

First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University, "Hippokration" Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Dimitris Tsiachris (D)

First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University, "Hippokration" Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Gemma Pelargonio (G)

Department of Cardiovascular & Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Classifications MeSH