Optimizing Trichiasis Case Finding to Attain the Elimination of Trachoma as a Public Health Problem.

Nigeria case finding gender trachomatous trichiasis

Journal

Tropical medicine and infectious disease
ISSN: 2414-6366
Titre abrégé: Trop Med Infect Dis
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101709042

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 08 05 2024
revised: 04 07 2024
accepted: 08 07 2024
medline: 26 7 2024
pubmed: 26 7 2024
entrez: 26 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

As national trachoma programmes increase efforts to reduce the burden of trachomatous trichiasis (TT), TT case finding and referral are critical public health programme components. Our research aimed to explore the most effective and efficient approaches to finding, referring, and managing TT cases. This was a prospective descriptive study, utilizing both routine programme data and primary data collection. This study compared four different approaches to finding TT cases across three different local government areas (LGAs) in Kano State, Nigeria. Each of the study LGAs was divided into four sub-units to accommodate the four different approaches. The number of outreach attendees was 4795 across the four case finding approaches, and this varied hugely, with the smallest number and proportion (403, 0.26%) in settings only employing house-to-house case finding and the largest number and proportion (1901, 0.99%) when town criers were used. That said, the proportion of TT cases among people presenting at outreach was highest (32.5%) when house-to-house case finding was used and lowest (10.3%) when town criers were used. More female TT patients were found (53-70%) and had surgery (79-85%) compared to male cases, across all approaches. The average project expenditure for finding one TT case was similar for approaches that included house-to-house case finding (USD 5.4-6.3), while it was 3.5 times higher (USD 21.5 per TT case found) when town criers were used. This study found that the house-to-house TT case finding approaches were the most efficient method with the highest yield of TT cases. Including other eye condition and/or vision testing yielded similar results but required more personnel and cost.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
As national trachoma programmes increase efforts to reduce the burden of trachomatous trichiasis (TT), TT case finding and referral are critical public health programme components. Our research aimed to explore the most effective and efficient approaches to finding, referring, and managing TT cases.
METHODS METHODS
This was a prospective descriptive study, utilizing both routine programme data and primary data collection. This study compared four different approaches to finding TT cases across three different local government areas (LGAs) in Kano State, Nigeria. Each of the study LGAs was divided into four sub-units to accommodate the four different approaches.
RESULTS RESULTS
The number of outreach attendees was 4795 across the four case finding approaches, and this varied hugely, with the smallest number and proportion (403, 0.26%) in settings only employing house-to-house case finding and the largest number and proportion (1901, 0.99%) when town criers were used. That said, the proportion of TT cases among people presenting at outreach was highest (32.5%) when house-to-house case finding was used and lowest (10.3%) when town criers were used. More female TT patients were found (53-70%) and had surgery (79-85%) compared to male cases, across all approaches. The average project expenditure for finding one TT case was similar for approaches that included house-to-house case finding (USD 5.4-6.3), while it was 3.5 times higher (USD 21.5 per TT case found) when town criers were used.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
This study found that the house-to-house TT case finding approaches were the most efficient method with the highest yield of TT cases. Including other eye condition and/or vision testing yielded similar results but required more personnel and cost.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39058199
pii: tropicalmed9070157
doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed9070157
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : UKAID
ID : Not applicable

Auteurs

Joy Shu'aibu (J)

Sightsavers, Abuja 900231, Nigeria.
Department of Family Medicine, Bingham University, Karu 961105, Nigeria.

Grace Ajege (G)

Sightsavers, Abuja 900231, Nigeria.

Caleb Mpyet (C)

Sightsavers, Abuja 900231, Nigeria.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Jos, Jos 930003, Nigeria.

Michael Dejene (M)

Public Health Consultancy Services, Addis Ababa 1169, Ethiopia.

Sunday Isiyaku (S)

Sightsavers, Abuja 900231, Nigeria.

Abubakar Tafida (A)

Ministry of Health Jigawa State, Dutse 720222, Nigeria.

Michaela Kelly (M)

Sightsavers, West Sussex RH16 4BX, UK.

Innocent Emereuwa (I)

Health and Development Support Programme, Jos 930003, Nigeria.

Paul Courtright (P)

Kilimanjaro Centre for Community Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa.

Classifications MeSH