The Dangers of Distracted Driving: A substudy of Patient Perception Data from the DRIVSAFE Observational Study.
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic trauma
ISSN: 1531-2291
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Trauma
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8807705
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jul 2024
26 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline:
26
7
2024
pubmed:
26
7
2024
entrez:
26
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To determine how fracture clinic patients perceive the dangers of distracted driving. Design: Analysis of patient perception subset data from the original DRIVSAFE study; a large, multi-center cross-sectional study, surveying fracture clinic patients about distracted driving. Four level 1 Canadian trauma center fracture clinics. English-speaking patients with a valid Canadian driver's license and a traumatic musculoskeletal injury sustained in the past six months. Primary outcome was patients' safety ratings of driving distractions. As per the original DRIVSAFE study, patients were categorized as distraction-prone or distraction-averse using their questionnaire responses and published crash-risk odds ratios (OR). A regression analysis was performed to identify associations with unsafe driving perceptions. The study included 1378 patients, 749 (54.3%) male and 614 (44.6%) female. The average age was 45.8 years old ± 17.0 (range 16-87). Sending electronic messages was perceived as unsafe by 92.9% (1242/1337) of patients, while reading them was seen as unsafe by 81.2% (1086/1337). Approximately three-quarters of patients viewed making (78.9%, 1061/1344) and accepting (74.8%, 998/1335) calls on handheld mobile phones as unsafe. However, 31.0% (421/1356) of patients believed they had no differences in their driving ability when talking on the phone while 13.1% (175/1340) reported no driving differences when texting. Younger age (OR, 0.93 [95% CI 0.90-0.96], p<0.001), driving experience (OR, 1.06 [95% CI 1.02-1.09], p<0.001), and distraction-prone drivers (OR, 3.79 [95% CI 2.91-4.94], p<0.001) were associated with unsafe driving perceptions. There is a clear association between being prone to distractions and unsafe driving perceptions, with distraction-prone drivers being 3.8 times more likely to perceive driving distractions as safe. This information could potentially influence the appropriate delivery and content of future educational efforts to change the perception of driving distractions and thereby reduce distracted driving. Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39058354
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002875
pii: 00005131-990000000-00409
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Potential Conflicts of Interest and Funding Sources: None to declare. Canadian Orthopaedic Research Legacy Grant, Physicians’ Services Incorporated Foundation, Regional Medical Associates.