The Grief Debate, the DSM, and Clinical Practice.


Journal

Journal of psychiatric practice
ISSN: 1538-1145
Titre abrégé: J Psychiatr Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100901141

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline: 26 7 2024
pubmed: 26 7 2024
entrez: 26 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There has been an ongoing debate regarding grief, whether it may be at times pathological, and whether it is different from depression. This article addresses those questions by tracking the changing course of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manuals of Mental Disorders (DSMs) since DSM-III and by reviewing the debate concerning grief and depression. At the time when DSM-III was being prepared in the late 1970s (it was published in 1980), there was a concern that normal bereavement (or grief) was being diagnosed as major depression. To address this concern, the editors of DSM-III added a category of "uncomplicated bereavement." The fourth edition of the DSM (DSM-IV), published in 1994, then followed by a minor change. However, the editors of DSM-5 decided to eliminate the bereavement exclusion entirely. Their concern was simply whether the individual did or did not suffer from major depression. Since an individual might not warrant a diagnosis of major depression but might still be experiencing grief, the DSM discussion leads directly into the question of whether grief-later called prolonged grief disorder-and depression are separate conditions. Advocates for prolonged grief disorder maintained that grief is different from depression but that patients may present with a mix of grief and depressive symptoms that are clinically difficult to distinguish. Advocates of separate conditions have in fact developed an inventory of symptoms that identify prolonged grief disorder. However, inasmuch as a typical grief presentation will include depressive symptoms, the clinical challenge is to distinguish prolonged grief disorder and major depression, as well as to distinguish both from normal grief. Given the temporal limits of an average consultation, this article argues that making the required distinctions is an unrealistic expectation. Finally, researchers have developed specific treatment programs for prolonged grief disorder, but a conflict between the 2 primary researchers involved and the generalities in which the programs are phrased have led to the suggestion of a different approach to treatment that replaces generalities with a person-centered approach.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39058529
doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000792
pii: 00131746-202407000-00008
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

292-296

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Références

Horowitz M. Meditating on complicated grief disorder as a diagnosis. Omega. 2006;52:87–89.
American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-III). APA; 1980.
American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). APA; 1994.
American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). APA; 2013.
Zachar P, First M, Kendler K. The bereavement exclusion debate in the DSM-5: a history. Clin Psychol Sci. 2017;5:890–906.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition-Revised (DSM-III-R). APA; 1987.
Kendler K, Meyers J, Zisook S. Does bereavement-related major depression differ from major depression associated with other stressful life events? Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:1449–1455.
Zachar P, First MB, Kendler KS. Prolonged grief disorder and the DSM: a history. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2023;211:386–392.
Zisook S, Kendler K. Is bereavement-related depression different than non-bereavement-related depression? Psychol Med. 2007;37:779–794.
Lamb K, Pies R, Zisook S. The bereavement exclusion for the diagnosis of major depression: to be, or not to be. World Psychiatry. 2010;7:19–25.
American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR). APA; 2022.
Kendler K, Gardner C. Boundaries of major depression: an evaluation of DSM-IV criteria. Am J Psychiatry. 1998;155:172–177.
Zisook S, Shear K. Grief and bereavement: what psychiatrists need to know. World Psychiatry. 2009;8:67–74.
Cozza SJ, Fisher JE, Mauro C, et al. Performance of DSM-5 persistent complex bereavement disorder criteria in a community sample of bereaved military family members. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173:919–929.
Shear MK, Simon N, Wall M, et al. Complicated grief and related bereavement issues for DSM-5. Depress Anxiety. 2011;28:103–117.
Shear K, Frank E, Houck PR, et al. Treatment of complicated grief: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293:2601–2608.
Shear MK, Reynolds CF III, Simon NM, et al. Optimizing treatment of complicated grief: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:685–694.
Prigerson HO, Jacobs SC. Traumatic grief as a distinct disorder: a rationale, consensus criteria, and a preliminary empirical test. In: Stroebe MS, Hansson RO, Stroebe W, et al, eds. Handbook of Bereavement Research: Consequences, Coping, and Care. American Psychological Association; 2001:613–645.
Prigerson HG, Wolfson L, Shear MK, et al. Case histories of traumatic grief. OMEGA (Westport). 1997;35:9–24.
Reynolds CF Ⅲ, Cozza SJ, Shear MK. Clinically relevant diagnostic criteria for a persistent impairing grief disorder: putting patients first. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74:433–434.
Horowitz MJ, Siegel B, Holen A, et al. Diagnostic criteria for complicated grief disorder. Focus. 2003;1:290–298. https://focus.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/foc.1.3.290.
doi: https://focus.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/foc.1.3.290
Eisma MC, Rosner R, Comtesse H. ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder criteria: turning challenges into opportunities with multiverse analyses. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:752.
Prigerson HG, Kakarala S, Gang J, et al. History and status of prolonged grief disorder as a psychiatric diagnosis. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021;17:109–126.
Prigerson HG, Horowitz MJ, Jacobs SC, et al. Prolonged grief disorder: psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000121.
Prigerson HG, Shear MK, Reynolds CF III. Prolonged grief disorder diagnostic criteria–helping those with maladaptive grief responses. JAMA Psychiatry. 2022;79:277–278.
Horowitz MJ, Bonanno GA, Holen A. Pathological grief: diagnosis and explanation. Psychosom Med. 1993;55:260–273.
Prigerson HG, Frank E, Kasl SV, et al. Complicated grief and bereavement-related depression as distinct disorders: preliminary empirical validation in elderly bereaved spouses. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152:22–30.
Prigerson HG, Maciejewski PK, Reynolds CF III, et al. Inventory of complicated grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatry Res. 1995;59:65–79.
Cozza SJ, Shear MK, Reynolds CF, et al. Optimizing the clinical utility of four proposed criteria for a persistent and impairing grief disorder by emphasizing core, rather than associated symptoms. Psychol Med. 2020;50:438–445.
First MB, Pies R, Zisook S. Depression or bereavement: defining the distinction. Medscape News: Psychiatry and Mental Health. 2011:1–10. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/740333
Boelen PA, Prigerson HG. The influence of symptoms of prolonged grief disorder, depression, and anxiety on quality of life among bereaved adults: a prospective study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007;257:444–452.
Moran M. Board approves new prolonged grief disorder for DSM. Psychiatric News. 2020. https://psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/appi.pn.2020.11a12
doi: 10.1176/appi.pn.2020.11a12
Szuhany KL, Malgaroli M, Miron C, et al. Prolonged grief disorder: course, diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2021;19:161–172.
Heinrichs DW. Model-based science and the ethics of ongoing treatment negotiation. In: Sadler JZ, Fulford KWM, van Staden WCW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Psychiatric Ethics (Vol. 2). Oxford Academic Press; 2015:1144–1159.
Killikelly C, Maercker A. Prolonged grief disorder for ICD-11: the primacy of clinical utility and international applicability. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018;8(Suppl 6):1476441.

Auteurs

James Phillips (J)

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH