Digital Health Literacy and Its Association With Sociodemographic Characteristics, Health Resource Use, and Health Outcomes: Rapid Review.

digital health digital health literacy eHealth literacy health information health literacy web-based database

Journal

Interactive journal of medical research
ISSN: 1929-073X
Titre abrégé: Interact J Med Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101598421

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 01 03 2023
accepted: 29 02 2024
revised: 21 07 2023
medline: 26 7 2024
pubmed: 26 7 2024
entrez: 26 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Digital health literacy has emerged as a critical skill set to navigate the digital age. This review sought to broadly summarize the literature on associations between digital health literacy and (1) sociodemographic characteristics, (2) health resource use, and (3) health outcomes in the general population, patient groups, or parent or caregiver groups. A rapid review of literature published between January 2016 and May 2022 was conducted through a search of 4 web-based databases. Articles were included on the basis of the following keywords: "measured digital health literacy," "digital literacy," "ehealth literacy," "e-health literacy," "electronic health literacy," or "internet health literacy" in adult populations; participants were from countries where English was the primary language; studies had to be cross-sectional, longitudinal, prospective, or retrospective, and published in English. Thirty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. Evidence on the associations between digital health literacy and sociodemographic characteristics varied (27/36, 75% included studies), with higher education (16/21, 76.2% studies that examined the association) and younger age (12/21, 57.1% studies) tending to predict higher digital health literacy; however, other studies found no associations. No differences between genders were found across the majority of studies. Evidence across ethnic groups was too limited to draw conclusions; some studies showed that those from racial and ethnic minority groups had higher digital health literacy than White individuals, while other studies showed no associations. Higher digital health literacy was associated with digital health resource use in the majority of studies (20/36, 55.6%) that examined this relationship. In addition, higher digital health literacy was also associated with health outcomes across 3 areas (psychosocial outcomes; chronic disease and health management behaviors; and physical outcomes) across 17 included studies (17/36, 47.2%) that explored these relationships. However, not all studies on the relationship among digital health literacy and health resource use and health outcomes were in the expected direction. The review presents mixed results regarding the relationship between digital health literacy and sociodemographic characteristics, although studies broadly found that increased digital health literacy was positively associated with improved health outcomes and behaviors. Further investigations of digital health literacy on chronic disease outcomes are needed, particularly across diverse groups. Empowering individuals with the skills to critically access and appraise reliable health information on digital platforms and devices is critical, given emerging evidence that suggests that those with low digital health literacy seek health information from unreliable sources. Identifying cost-effective strategies to rapidly assess and enhance digital health literacy capacities across community settings thus warrants continued investigation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Digital health literacy has emerged as a critical skill set to navigate the digital age.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This review sought to broadly summarize the literature on associations between digital health literacy and (1) sociodemographic characteristics, (2) health resource use, and (3) health outcomes in the general population, patient groups, or parent or caregiver groups.
METHODS METHODS
A rapid review of literature published between January 2016 and May 2022 was conducted through a search of 4 web-based databases. Articles were included on the basis of the following keywords: "measured digital health literacy," "digital literacy," "ehealth literacy," "e-health literacy," "electronic health literacy," or "internet health literacy" in adult populations; participants were from countries where English was the primary language; studies had to be cross-sectional, longitudinal, prospective, or retrospective, and published in English.
RESULTS RESULTS
Thirty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. Evidence on the associations between digital health literacy and sociodemographic characteristics varied (27/36, 75% included studies), with higher education (16/21, 76.2% studies that examined the association) and younger age (12/21, 57.1% studies) tending to predict higher digital health literacy; however, other studies found no associations. No differences between genders were found across the majority of studies. Evidence across ethnic groups was too limited to draw conclusions; some studies showed that those from racial and ethnic minority groups had higher digital health literacy than White individuals, while other studies showed no associations. Higher digital health literacy was associated with digital health resource use in the majority of studies (20/36, 55.6%) that examined this relationship. In addition, higher digital health literacy was also associated with health outcomes across 3 areas (psychosocial outcomes; chronic disease and health management behaviors; and physical outcomes) across 17 included studies (17/36, 47.2%) that explored these relationships. However, not all studies on the relationship among digital health literacy and health resource use and health outcomes were in the expected direction.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The review presents mixed results regarding the relationship between digital health literacy and sociodemographic characteristics, although studies broadly found that increased digital health literacy was positively associated with improved health outcomes and behaviors. Further investigations of digital health literacy on chronic disease outcomes are needed, particularly across diverse groups. Empowering individuals with the skills to critically access and appraise reliable health information on digital platforms and devices is critical, given emerging evidence that suggests that those with low digital health literacy seek health information from unreliable sources. Identifying cost-effective strategies to rapidly assess and enhance digital health literacy capacities across community settings thus warrants continued investigation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39059006
pii: v13i1e46888
doi: 10.2196/46888
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

e46888

Informations de copyright

©Eva Yuen, Natalie Winter, Feby Savira, Catherine E Huggins, Lemai Nguyen, Paul Cooper, Anna Peeters, Kate Anderson, Rahul Bhoyroo, Sarah Crowe, Anna Ugalde. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (https://www.i-jmr.org/), 26.07.2024.

Auteurs

Eva Yuen (E)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
Monash Health, Clayton, Australia.

Natalie Winter (N)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.

Feby Savira (F)

Global Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.

Catherine E Huggins (CE)

Global Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.

Lemai Nguyen (L)

Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
Department of Information Systems and Business Analytics, Deakin Business School, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.

Paul Cooper (P)

School of Medicine, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.

Anna Peeters (A)

Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.

Kate Anderson (K)

School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
School of Computing Technologies, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.

Rahul Bhoyroo (R)

Western Victoria Primary Health Network, Geelong, Australia.

Sarah Crowe (S)

Western Victoria Primary Health Network, Geelong, Australia.

Anna Ugalde (A)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.

Classifications MeSH