Vitrectomy versus scleral buckle for retinal detachment without posterior vitreous detachment.
Posterior vitreous detachment
Retinal detachment
Scleral buckling
Vitrectomy
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jul 2024
25 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
20
03
2024
accepted:
10
07
2024
medline:
27
7
2024
pubmed:
27
7
2024
entrez:
26
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare the effectiveness and safety of scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy in treating retinal detachment without posterior vitreous detachment. A total of 88 eyes of 83 patients with retinal detachment without prior posterior vitreous detachment were investigated retrospectively. Group A comprised patients who underwent scleral buckling (n = 47) and Group B (n = 36) patients who were treated with pars plana vitrectomy. Anatomical success, postoperative visual acuity, and ocular adverse events were evaluated. The primary and final anatomical success rate showed a nonsignificant difference (p = 0.465 and p = 0.37 respectively). No significant difference was observed in the reoperation rate or development of epiretinal membrane between the groups (p = 0.254 and p = 0.254 respectively). However, scleral buckling resulted in significantly better visual acuity at the last follow-up (0.12 ± 0.23) compared to pars plana vitrectomy (0.37 ± 0.46, p = 0.001). The incidence of cataract progression was also significantly higher in the pars plana vitrectomy group (46%) compared to the scleral buckling group (10%, p < 0.001). Scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy show similar success rates in treating retinal detachment without vitreous detachment. However, due to less cataract progression and better visual acuity outcomes, scleral buckling is recommended for these cases. Determining vitreous status before surgery is crucial for optimal outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39060328
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67318-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-67318-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17141Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Schick, T., Heimann, H. & Schaub, F. Netzhautablösung: Teil 1. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 237, 1479–1491 (2020).
pubmed: 33207382
Bechrakis, N. E. & Dimmer, A. Rhegmatogene netzhautablösung. Der Ophthalmol. 115, 163–178 (2018).
Nielsen, B. R., Alberti, M., Bjerrum, S. S. & la Cour, M. The incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment is increasing. Acta Ophthalmol. 98, 603–606 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/aos.14380
pubmed: 32086859
Machemer, R. The importance of fluid absorption, traction, intraocular currents, and chorioretinal scars in the therapy of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 98, 681–693 (1984).
doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90682-2
pubmed: 6507539
Santra, M. et al. Induction of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) by non-enzymatic reagents targeting vitreous collagen liquefaction as well as vitreoretinal adhesion. Sci. Rep. 10, 8250 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64931-3
pubmed: 32427865
pmcid: 7237681
Blindbaek, S. & Grauslund, J. Prophylactic treatment of retinal breaks: A systematic review. Acta Ophthalmol. 93, 3–8 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/aos.12447
pubmed: 24853827
Steel, D. Retinal detachment. BMJ Clin Evid 2014 (2014).
Brod, R. D. & Flynn, H. W. Asymptomatic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 7, 1–6 (1996).
doi: 10.1097/00055735-199606000-00001
pubmed: 10163453
Ung, T. et al. Clinical features and surgical management of retinal detachment secondary to round retinal holes. Eye 19, 665–669 (2005).
doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701618
pubmed: 15359254
Mitry, D. et al. The predisposing pathology and clinical characteristics in the scottish retinal detachment study. Ophthalmology 118, 1429–1434 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.11.031
pubmed: 21561662
Noori, J., Bilonick, R. A. & Eller, A. W. Scleral buckle surgery for primary retinal detachment without posterior vitreous detachment. Retina 36, 2066–2071 (2016).
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001075
pubmed: 27172097
Dhoot, A. S. et al. Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle: A comprehensive meta-analysis of 15,947 eyes. Surv. Ophthalmol. 67, 932–949 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.12.005
pubmed: 34896191
Nichani, P. A. H. et al. Scleral buckling alone or in combination with pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: A meta-analysis of 7212 eyes. Ophthalmologica 245, 296–314 (2022).
doi: 10.1159/000524888
pubmed: 35533652
Cankurtaran, V., Citirik, M., Simsek, M., Tekin, K. & Teke, M. Y. Anatomical and functional outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 17, 74–80 (2017).
doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2017.1560
pubmed: 28135566
pmcid: 5341782
Park, S. W. et al. Comparison of scleral buckling and vitrectomy using wide angle viewing system for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in patients older than 35 years. BMC Ophthalmol. 15, 121 (2015).
doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0109-9
pubmed: 26362540
pmcid: 4566311
Heimann, H. et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 114, 2142-2154.e4 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.09.013
pubmed: 18054633
Zhao, X. et al. Comparison between releasable scleral buckling and vitrectomy in patients with phakic primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 40, 33–40 (2020).
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002348
pubmed: 30300265
Brazitikos, P. D., Androudi, S., Christen, W. G. & Stangos, N. T. Primary pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle surgery for the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment: A randomized clinical trial. Retina 25(8), 957–964 (2005).
doi: 10.1097/00006982-200512000-00001
pubmed: 16340523
Williams, K. M., Dogramaci, M. & Williamson, T. H. Retrospective study of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments secondary to round retinal holes. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 22, 635–640 (2012).
doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000080
pubmed: 22081671
Gonzales, C. R. The fellow eye of patients with phakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment from atrophic holes of lattice degeneration without posterior vitreous detachment. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 88, 1400–1402 (2004).
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.043240
pubmed: 15489481
pmcid: 1772383
Mitry, D., Charteris, D. G., Fleck, B. W., Campbell, H. & Singh, J. The epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: Geographical variation and clinical associations. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 94, 678–684 (2010).
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.157727
pubmed: 19515646
Li, X. Study group of epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Beijing China. [Epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Beijing, China]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 38, 584–588 (2002).
pubmed: 12487905
Laatikainen, L. & Harju, H. Bilateral rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol. 63, 541–545 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1985.tb05242.x
Laatikainen, L., Tolppanen, E.-M. & Harju, H. Epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in a Finnish population. Acta Ophthalmol. 63, 59–64 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1985.tb05216.x
Ammous, I. et al. Atrophic tear retinal detachment: Clinical characteristics and surgical treatment results at long term. Tunis Med. 95, 206–209 (2017).
pubmed: 29446816
Koutsandrea, C. et al. Scleral buckling versus vitrectomy for retinal detachment repair: Comparison of visual fields and nerve fiber layer thickness. Ophthalmologica 235, 10–17 (2016).
doi: 10.1159/000439443
pubmed: 26731764
Wong, C. W. et al. Scleral buckling versus vitrectomy in the management of macula-off primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 35, 2552–2557 (2015).
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000642
pubmed: 26049617
Gharbiya, M. et al. Comparison between scleral buckling and vitrectomy in the onset of cystoid macular edema and epiretinal membrane after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Retina 42, 1268–1276 (2022).
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003475
pubmed: 35316255
pmcid: 9205297
Hirakata, T. et al. Risk factors for macular pucker after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery. Sci. Rep. 11, 18276 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97738-x
pubmed: 34521926
pmcid: 8440624
Patel, S. N. et al. Surgical failures after primary scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 41, 2288–2295 (2021).
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003214
pubmed: 34001820
Kinori, M. et al. Comparison of pars plana vitrectomy with and without scleral buckle for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 152, 291-297.e2 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.049
pubmed: 21664592
Lindsell, L. et al. Comparison of outcomes: scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy versus vitrectomy alone for primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Clin. Ophthalmol. 11, 47–54 (2016).
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S112190
pubmed: 28053500
pmcid: 5189967