Selective Activation of the Spinal Cord with Epidural Electrical Stimulation.

epidural stimulation functional neuroanatomy neuromodulation orientation-selective stimulation pain rats spatial-selective stimulation spinal cord injury spinal cord stimulation spinally evoked motor potentials

Journal

Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 12 06 2024
revised: 22 06 2024
accepted: 25 06 2024
medline: 27 7 2024
pubmed: 27 7 2024
entrez: 27 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Spinal cord epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has been successfully employed to treat chronic pain and to restore lost functions after spinal cord injury. Yet, the efficacy of this approach is largely challenged by the suboptimal spatial distribution of the electrode contacts across anatomical targets, limiting the spatial selectivity of stimulation. In this study, we exploited different ESS paradigms, designed as either Spatial-Selective Stimulation (SSES) or Orientation-Selective Epidural Stimulation (OSES), and compared them to Conventional Monopolar Epidural Stimulation (CMES). SSES, OSES, and CMES were delivered with a 3- or 4-contact electrode array. Amplitudes and latencies of the Spinally Evoked Motor Potentials (SEMPs) were evaluated with different EES modalities. The results demonstrate that the amplitudes of SEMPs in hindlimb muscles depend on the orientation of the electrical field and vary between stimulation modalities. These findings show that the electric field applied with SSES or OSES provides more selective control of amplitudes of the SEMPs as compared to CMES. We demonstrate that spinal cord epidural stimulation applied with SSES or OSES paradigms in the rodent model could be tailored to the functional spinal cord neuroanatomy and can be tuned to specific target fibers and their orientation, optimizing the effect of neuromodulation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39061391
pii: brainsci14070650
doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070650
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : U01NS103569
Pays : United States

Auteurs

Carlos Cuellar (C)

School of Sport Sciences, Universidad Anáhuac México, Huixquilucan 52786, Mexico.

Lauri Lehto (L)

Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Riaz Islam (R)

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Silvia Mangia (S)

Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Shalom Michaeli (S)

Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Igor Lavrov (I)

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia.
Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Classifications MeSH