The Clinical Impact of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback on Emotion Regulation: A Systematic Review.

emotion regulation neurofeedback neuromodulation real-time fMRI systematic review

Journal

Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 14 06 2024
revised: 05 07 2024
accepted: 09 07 2024
medline: 27 7 2024
pubmed: 27 7 2024
entrez: 27 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Emotion dysregulation has long been considered a key symptom in multiple psychiatric disorders. Difficulties in emotion regulation have been associated with neural dysregulation in fronto-limbic circuits. Real-time fMRI-based neurofeedback (rt-fMRI-NFB) has become increasingly popular as a potential treatment for emotional dysregulation in psychiatric disorders, as it is able to directly target the impaired neural circuits. However, the clinical impact of these rt-fMRI-NFB protocols in psychiatric populations is still largely unknown. Here we provide a comprehensive overview of primary studies from 2010 to 2023 that used rt-fMRI-NFB to target emotion regulation. We assessed 41 out of 4001 original studies for methodological quality and risk of bias and synthesised concerning the frequency of significant rt-fMRI-NFB-related effects on the neural and behaviour level. Successful modulation of brain activity was reported in between 25 and 50 percent of study samples, while neural effects in clinical samples were more diverse than in healthy samples. Interestingly, the frequency of rt-fMRI-NFB-related behavioural improvement was over 75 percent in clinical samples, while healthy samples showed behavioural improvements between 0 and 25 percent. Concerning clinical subsamples, rt-fMRI-NFB-related behavioural improvement was observed in up to 100 percent of major depressive disorder (MDD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) samples. Substance use samples showed behavioural benefits ranging between 50 and 75 percent. Neural effects appeared to be less frequent than behavioural improvements: most neural outcomes ranged between 25 and 50 percent for MDD and substance use and between 0 and 25 percent for PTSD. Using multiple individualised regions of interest (ROIs) for rt-fMRI-NFB training resulted in more frequent behavioural benefits than rt-fMRI-NFB solely based on the amygdala or the prefrontal cortex. While a significant improvement in behavioural outcomes was reported in most clinical studies, the study protocols were heterogeneous, which limits the current evaluation of rt-fMRI-NFB as a putative treatment for emotional dysregulation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39061440
pii: brainsci14070700
doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070700
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Nadja Tschentscher (N)

Section of Clinical Psychology and Psychophysiology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Julia C Tafelmaier (JC)

Section of Clinical Psychology and Psychophysiology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Christian F J Woll (CFJ)

Section of Clinical Psychology of Children and Adolescents, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802 Munich, Germany.

Oliver Pogarell (O)

Section of Clinical Psychology and Psychophysiology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Maximilian Maywald (M)

Section of Clinical Psychology and Psychophysiology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Larissa Vierl (L)

Section of Clinical Psychology and Psychophysiology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Section of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Treatment, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802 Munich, Germany.

Katrin Breitenstein (K)

Section of Clinical Psychology and Psychophysiology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Susanne Karch (S)

Section of Clinical Psychology and Psychophysiology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Classifications MeSH