Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality after Thrombectomy in Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion: A Retrospective, Machine Learning Study.

in-hospital mortality ischemic stroke machine learning mechanical thrombectomy

Journal

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 18 06 2024
revised: 08 07 2024
accepted: 14 07 2024
medline: 27 7 2024
pubmed: 27 7 2024
entrez: 27 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite the increased use of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in recent years, there remains a lack of research on in-hospital mortality rates following the procedure, the primary factors influencing these rates, and the potential for predicting them. This study aimed to utilize interpretable machine learning (ML) to help clarify these uncertainties. This retrospective study involved patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO)-related ischemic stroke who underwent MT. The patient division was made into two groups: (I) the in-hospital death group, referred to as miserable outcome, and (II) the in-hospital survival group, or favorable outcome. Python 3.10.9 was utilized to develop the machine learning models, which consisted of two types based on input features: (I) the Pre-MT model, incorporating baseline features, and (II) the Post-MT model, which included both baseline and MT-related features. After a feature selection process, the models were trained, internally evaluated, and tested, after which interpretation frameworks were employed to clarify the decision-making processes. This study included 602 patients with a median age of 76 years (interquartile range (IQR) 65-83), out of which 54% ( This study demonstrates the moderate to strong effectiveness of interpretable machine learning models in predicting in-hospital mortality following mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke, with AUCs of 0.792 for the Pre-MT model and 0.837 for the Post-MT model. Key predictors included patient age, baseline NIHSS, NLR, INR, occluded vessel type, PAD, baseline glycemia, pre-mRS, PET, and OPT. These findings provide valuable insights into risk factors and could improve post-procedural patient management.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Despite the increased use of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in recent years, there remains a lack of research on in-hospital mortality rates following the procedure, the primary factors influencing these rates, and the potential for predicting them. This study aimed to utilize interpretable machine learning (ML) to help clarify these uncertainties.
METHODS METHODS
This retrospective study involved patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO)-related ischemic stroke who underwent MT. The patient division was made into two groups: (I) the in-hospital death group, referred to as miserable outcome, and (II) the in-hospital survival group, or favorable outcome. Python 3.10.9 was utilized to develop the machine learning models, which consisted of two types based on input features: (I) the Pre-MT model, incorporating baseline features, and (II) the Post-MT model, which included both baseline and MT-related features. After a feature selection process, the models were trained, internally evaluated, and tested, after which interpretation frameworks were employed to clarify the decision-making processes.
RESULTS RESULTS
This study included 602 patients with a median age of 76 years (interquartile range (IQR) 65-83), out of which 54% (
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates the moderate to strong effectiveness of interpretable machine learning models in predicting in-hospital mortality following mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke, with AUCs of 0.792 for the Pre-MT model and 0.837 for the Post-MT model. Key predictors included patient age, baseline NIHSS, NLR, INR, occluded vessel type, PAD, baseline glycemia, pre-mRS, PET, and OPT. These findings provide valuable insights into risk factors and could improve post-procedural patient management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39061668
pii: diagnostics14141531
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141531
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Ivan Petrović (I)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.

Serena Broggi (S)

Neurology and Stroke Unit, ASST dei Sette Laghi, 21100 Varese, Italy.

Monika Killer-Oberpfalzer (M)

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Salzburg, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Institute of Neurointervention, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.

Johannes A R Pfaff (JAR)

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Salzburg, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.

Christoph J Griessenauer (CJ)

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Salzburg, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.

Isidora Milosavljević (I)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.

Ana Balenović (A)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.

Johannes S Mutzenbach (JS)

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Salzburg, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.

Slaven Pikija (S)

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Salzburg, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.

Classifications MeSH