Health Technology Assessment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuit with and without Phosphorylcholine Coating: A Retrospective Study on Safety and Efficiency in Cardiac Surgery.

albumin levels antithrombin III aortic valve replacement biocompatibility cardiac surgery cardiopulmonary bypass coating coronary artery bypass grafting efficiency mitral valve repair phosphorylcholine platelet counts safety thrombotic events

Journal

Life (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-1729
Titre abrégé: Life (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101580444

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 21 05 2024
revised: 04 07 2024
accepted: 05 07 2024
medline: 27 7 2024
pubmed: 27 7 2024
entrez: 27 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Phosphorylcholine has emerged as a potential adjunctive agent in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits. Phosphorylcholine serves as a coating for the CPB circuit, potentially enhancing biocompatibility and reducing thrombotic events. However, its impact on specific patient populations and procedural outcomes remains underexplored. In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 60 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB, comprising 20 cases each of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), mitral valve repair, and aortic valve replacement. The patient cohort was divided into two groups-30 patients whose CPB circuits were coated with phosphorylcholine (phosphorylcholine-coated group) and 30 patients who did not receive phosphorylcholine supplementation or circuit coating. Both groups underwent surgery with identical CPB circuit designs. We assessed the absence of adverse events, safety, and efficacy parameters, including blood loss, clotting, and the structural integrity of the CPB circuit. Additionally, we measured changes in mean albumin levels (g/dL), mean platelet counts (×10 The retrospective analysis revealed an absence of adverse events in both groups. In the phosphorylcholine-coated group compared to the non-phosphorylcholine-coated group, there was a notable difference in the delta change in mean albumin levels (0.87 ± 0.1 vs. 1.65 ± 0.2 g/dL, Both groups, phosphorylcholine and non-phosphorylcholine, demonstrated the absence of adverse events and that the systems are safe for iatrogenic complication. Our findings suggest that the use of phosphorylcholine coating on the CPB circuit, in the absence of supplementary phosphorylcholine, in cardiac surgery is associated with favorable changes in mean albumin levels, mean platelet counts, and ATIII levels. Further research is warranted to elucidate the full extent of phosphorylcholine's impact on patient outcomes and CPB circuit performance.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Phosphorylcholine has emerged as a potential adjunctive agent in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits. Phosphorylcholine serves as a coating for the CPB circuit, potentially enhancing biocompatibility and reducing thrombotic events. However, its impact on specific patient populations and procedural outcomes remains underexplored.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 60 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB, comprising 20 cases each of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), mitral valve repair, and aortic valve replacement. The patient cohort was divided into two groups-30 patients whose CPB circuits were coated with phosphorylcholine (phosphorylcholine-coated group) and 30 patients who did not receive phosphorylcholine supplementation or circuit coating. Both groups underwent surgery with identical CPB circuit designs. We assessed the absence of adverse events, safety, and efficacy parameters, including blood loss, clotting, and the structural integrity of the CPB circuit. Additionally, we measured changes in mean albumin levels (g/dL), mean platelet counts (×10
RESULTS RESULTS
The retrospective analysis revealed an absence of adverse events in both groups. In the phosphorylcholine-coated group compared to the non-phosphorylcholine-coated group, there was a notable difference in the delta change in mean albumin levels (0.87 ± 0.1 vs. 1.65 ± 0.2 g/dL,
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Both groups, phosphorylcholine and non-phosphorylcholine, demonstrated the absence of adverse events and that the systems are safe for iatrogenic complication. Our findings suggest that the use of phosphorylcholine coating on the CPB circuit, in the absence of supplementary phosphorylcholine, in cardiac surgery is associated with favorable changes in mean albumin levels, mean platelet counts, and ATIII levels. Further research is warranted to elucidate the full extent of phosphorylcholine's impact on patient outcomes and CPB circuit performance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39063605
pii: life14070851
doi: 10.3390/life14070851
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Ignazio Condello (I)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Giuseppe Nasso (G)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Salvatore Scrivo (S)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Flavio Fiore (F)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Giuseppe Speziale (G)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Classifications MeSH