Biomarker expression and impact on clinical outcomes in an international study of chemoradiation and MRI-based image-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: BIOEMBRACE.

Deescalation Image Guided Brachytherapy PDL-1 Radiotherapy Dose Response p-16

Journal

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 23 05 2024
revised: 01 07 2024
accepted: 13 07 2024
medline: 28 7 2024
pubmed: 28 7 2024
entrez: 27 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

BIOEMBRACE-I was designed to study the impact of biomarkers in addition to clinic-pathological factors on disease outcomes in patients treated with chemoradiation and MRI-guided brachytherapy (BT) for locally advanced cervical cancer in EMBRACE study. Between 2018-2021, eight EMBRACE-I sites contributed tumour tissue for immunohistochemistry of p16, PD-L1 and L1CAM. These biomarkers and clinicopathological factors (FIGO 2009 stage, nodal status, histology, necrosis on MRI) were analysed to predict poor response at brachytherapy (BT) (high-risk clinical target volume [HR-CTV] ≥40cc) at BT), and 5-year local control, pelvic control and disease-free survival (DFS). Interaction between p16, PD-L1, radiotherapy dose (HR-CTV D90) and disease outcomes was investigated. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed. Two-hundred sixty-four patients were included. The median HR-CTV D90 was 89 (86-95) Gy. p16 positive (pos), PD-L1>1% and L1CAM ≥ 10% was noted in 86.6%, 20.1% and 17.8% respectively. P16 negative (neg) status (OR 2.0 (1.0-5.7), p=0.04), necrosis on MRI (OR 2.1 (1.1-4.3), p<0.02) independently predicted for HR-CTV≥40cc, as did FIGO stage and tumour width >5cm. PDL1>1% was associated with reduced local (82% vs. 94%, p=0.02) and pelvic control (79% vs. 89%, p=0.02). HR-CTV D90 <85Gy was associated with inferior 5-year local control in p16+ patients especially if PD-L1 was co-expressed. On multivariable analysis, PD-L1>1% was the only independent factor for 5-year local control (HR 3.3, p=0.04) and L1CAM ≥50% for pelvic control (HR 5.5 (1.3-23.3), p =0.02). P16 neg status and tumor necrosis on MRI are independently associated with poor response to chemoradiation, whereas PD-L1>1% and L1CAM≥50% have an independent impact on local and pelvic control suggesting impact of biomarker expression on outcomes. Further validation is needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39067486
pii: S0360-3016(24)03141-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.2316
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Supriya Chopra (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: schopra@actrec.gov.in.

Tjalling Bosse (T)

Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Nanda Horeweg (N)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Kedar Deodhar (K)

Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.

Santosh Menon (S)

Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.

Tynisha Rafael (T)

Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Venkatesh Pai (V)

Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.

Lucia Rijstenberg (L)

Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Folkert van Kemenade (F)

Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Sadhana Kannan (S)

Epidemiology and Clinical Trials Unit, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.

Umesh Mahantshetty (U)

Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.

Barbara Segedin (B)

Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Fleur Huang (F)

Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Department of Oncology, Edmonton, Canada.

Kjersti Bruheim (K)

Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Margarita Perez (M)

Navarra Investigacion Biomedical, Pampalona, Spain.

Bhavana Rai (B)

Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Li Tee Tan (LT)

Addenbrooke ́s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.

Nadia Giannakopoulus (N)

Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Department of Oncology, Edmonton, Canada.

Maximilian Schmid (M)

Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Kari Tanderup (K)

Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Richard Pötter (R)

Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Remi Nout (R)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: r.nout@erasmusmc.nl.

Classifications MeSH