The impact of mobile health interventions on service users' health outcomes and the role of health professions: a systematic review of systematic reviews-protocol.
Digital health
Health professions
Long-term conditions
Mobile health
Patients’ outcomes
Journal
Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Jul 2024
27 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
15
11
2023
accepted:
20
07
2024
medline:
28
7
2024
pubmed:
28
7
2024
entrez:
27
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mobile health tools have gained prominence in global health care in recent years. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions have demonstrated their impact on managing healthcare service users' health. A pilot search revealed many systematic reviews on the effectiveness of mobile health tools on service users' health outcomes. However, how the role of healthcare professionals in promoting the adoption of mobile health may lead to improved outcomes needs to be clarified. Therefore, this systematic review aims to synthesise existing systematic reviews that examine both the impact of mobile health interventions on service users' outcomes and the role of healthcare professionals in facilitating the adoption of mobile health solutions. Five electronic databases will be searched: EMBASE, CINHAL Plus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for systematic reviews exploring the impact of mobile health interventions on service users' outcomes and the role of healthcare professionals in facilitating the adoption of mobile health solutions. Systematic reviews published in English dated from January 2015 to June 2024 will be included. Screening and selection of the reviews against inclusion and exclusion criteria will be performed by three independent reviewers, as well as data extraction and quality assessment. Current systematic reviews in mHealth have primarily focused on assessing the effectiveness of mHealth interventions for managing a range of conditions. While these reviews provide valuable input into the outcomes for mHealth, more is needed to know about the impact of the involvement of health professions on service users' outcomes when adopting mHealth. This systematic review of systematic reviews aims to bridge this critical gap in the literature by critically appraising and synthesising the evidence of mHealth interventions' impact on service user outcomes and the level of involvement of health professionals. PROSPERO CRD 42023414435.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Mobile health tools have gained prominence in global health care in recent years. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions have demonstrated their impact on managing healthcare service users' health. A pilot search revealed many systematic reviews on the effectiveness of mobile health tools on service users' health outcomes. However, how the role of healthcare professionals in promoting the adoption of mobile health may lead to improved outcomes needs to be clarified. Therefore, this systematic review aims to synthesise existing systematic reviews that examine both the impact of mobile health interventions on service users' outcomes and the role of healthcare professionals in facilitating the adoption of mobile health solutions.
METHODS
METHODS
Five electronic databases will be searched: EMBASE, CINHAL Plus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for systematic reviews exploring the impact of mobile health interventions on service users' outcomes and the role of healthcare professionals in facilitating the adoption of mobile health solutions. Systematic reviews published in English dated from January 2015 to June 2024 will be included. Screening and selection of the reviews against inclusion and exclusion criteria will be performed by three independent reviewers, as well as data extraction and quality assessment.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Current systematic reviews in mHealth have primarily focused on assessing the effectiveness of mHealth interventions for managing a range of conditions. While these reviews provide valuable input into the outcomes for mHealth, more is needed to know about the impact of the involvement of health professions on service users' outcomes when adopting mHealth. This systematic review of systematic reviews aims to bridge this critical gap in the literature by critically appraising and synthesising the evidence of mHealth interventions' impact on service user outcomes and the level of involvement of health professionals.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
PROSPERO CRD 42023414435.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39068478
doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02624-y
pii: 10.1186/s13643-024-02624-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
199Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
United Nations. Migration and human mobility. http://www.unfpa.org/migration . Accessed 15 Feb 2023.
Willems SH, Rao J, Bhambere S, Patel D, Biggins Y, Guite JW. Digital solutions to alleviate the burden on health systems during a public healthcare crisis: Covid-19 as an opportunity. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2021;9(6); https://doi.org/10.2196/21127 .
Park Y. Emerging new era of mobile health technologies. Healthc Inform Res. 2016;22(4):253. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2016.22.4.253 .
doi: 10.4258/hir.2016.22.4.253
pubmed: 27895955
pmcid: 5116535
Aslani N, Lazem M, Mahdavi S, Garavand A. A review of mobile health applications in epidemic and pandemic outbreaks: lessons learned for COVID-19. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2020;15(4). https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid.103649 .
Milne-Ives M, Lam C, De Cock C, Van Velthoven MH, Meinert E. Mobile apps for health behavior change in physical activity, diet, drug and alcohol use, and mental health: systematic review. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2020;8(3): https://doi.org/10.2196/17046
Cao J, Lim Y, Sengoku S, Guo X, Kodama K, Exploring the shift in international trends in mobile health research from,. to 2020: Bibliometric analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2000;2021:9. https://doi.org/10.2196/22994 .
doi: 10.2196/22994
Ratanawong P, Naslund A, Mikal P, Grande W. Achieving the potential of mHealth in medicine requires challenging the ethos of care delivery. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022;23; https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423622000101 .
Osei E, Mashamba-Thompson TP. Mobile health applications for disease screening and treatment support in low-and middle-income countries: A narrative review. Heliyon. 2021;7(3); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06639 .
Kitsiou S, Paré G, Jaana M, Gerber B. Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for patients with diabetes: An overview of systematic reviews. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(3) ; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173160 .
Sahin C. Rules of engagement in mobile health: What does mobile health bring to research and theory? Contemp Nurse. 2018;54(4–5):374–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2018.1448290 .
doi: 10.1080/10376178.2018.1448290
pubmed: 29502472
Wang Y, Wu T, Chen Z. Active usage of mobile health applications: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(12) ; https://doi.org/10.2196/25330 .
Lucivero F, Jongsma R. A mobile revolution for healthcare? setting the agenda for bioethics. J Med Ethics. 2018;44(10):685–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2017-104741 .
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104741
pubmed: 29907579
Commission E. GREEN PAPER on mobile health (“mHealth”) COM 219. Brussels: European Commission; 2014.
Chidambaram S, Erridge S, Kinross J, Purkayastha S. Observational study of UK mobile health apps for covid-19. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(8):90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30144-8 .
doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30144-8
Rathi S, Chakrabarti AS, Chatterjee C, Hegde A. Pandemics and technology engagement: new evidence from m-Health intervention during Covid-19 in India. Rev Dev Econ. 2022;26(4):2184–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12872 .
doi: 10.1111/rode.12872
Boruchowicz C, López Bóo F, Finamor Pfeifer F, Russo GA, Souza Pacheco T. Are behaviorally informed text messages effective in promoting compliance with covid-19 preventive measures?: evidence from an RCT in the city of São Paulo. 2021-IDB-TN; https://doi.org/10.18235/0002722 .
Abbaspur-Behbahani S, Monaghesh E, Hajizadeh A, Fehresti S. Application of mobile health to support the elderly during the COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review. Health Policy Technol. 2022;11(1): 100595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100595 .
doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100595
pubmed: 35018280
pmcid: 8739352
Alkhaldi O, McMillan B, Maddah N, Ainsworth J. Interventions aimed at enhancing healthcare providers’ behavior toward the prescription of mobile health apps: Systematic review. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2023;11; https://doi.org/10.2196/40416 .
The NHS Long Term Plan. https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/nhs-long-term-plan-version-1.2.pdf . Accessed 09 Aug 2023.
Albulushi A, Al Kindi D, Moawwad N, Kamel A, Khan A, Moustafa M, Al KA. Digital health technologies in enhancing patient and caregiver engagement in heart failure management: opportunities and challenges. Int J Cardiol. 2024;408: 132116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132116 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132116
pubmed: 38703898
Slevin P, Kessie T, Cullen J, Butler MW, Donnelly SC, Caulfield B. Exploring the barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health technologies for the management of COPD: a qualitative study of clinician perceptions. QJM. 2019;112(8):567–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcz241 .
doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcz241
El Amrani L, Oude Engberink A, Ninot G, Hayot M, Carbonnel F. Connected health devices for healthcare in French general medicine practice: Cross-sectional study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2017;5(12); https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7427 .
Safi S, Thiessen T, Schmailzl KJ. Acceptance and resistance of new digital technologies in medicine: qualitative study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018;7(12) ; https://doi.org/10.2196/11072 .
Mayer A, Rodríguez Blanco O, Torrejon A. Use of health apps by nurses for professional purposes: Web-based survey study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2019;7(11); https://doi.org/10.2196/15195 .
Joanna Briggs Institute. The systematic review of economic evaluation evidence. https://jbi.global/ . Accessed 22 May 2023.
Silva B, Rodrigues G, Díez I, López-Coronado M, Saleem K. Mobile-health: Review of current state in 2015. J Biomed Inform. 2015;56:265–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.003
pubmed: 26071682
Commission E. Mobile health reconciling technological innovation with data protection. Brussels: European Commission; 2015.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7); https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 .
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, Moher D, Tugwell P, Welch V, Kristjansson E, Henry DA. AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008 .
Rowland SP, Fitzgerald JE, Holme T, Powell J, McGregor A. What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients? NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3:4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0206-x .
doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0206-x
pubmed: 31970289
pmcid: 6957674
Leigh S, Ashall-Payne L, Andrews T. Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of mobile health among healthcare professionals from the United Kingdom: Discrete choice experiment. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2020;8(7) https://doi.org/10.2196/17704 .
Gagnon M, Ngangue P, Payne-Gagnon J, Desmartis M. m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23:212–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw084 .
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw084
pubmed: 26078410