Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement.

digital health maternity midwife nurse realist synthesis stakeholder involvement tele-health

Journal

Journal of research in nursing : JRN
ISSN: 1744-988X
Titre abrégé: J Res Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101234311

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 29 7 2024
pubmed: 29 7 2024
entrez: 29 7 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The COVID pandemic prompted an increase in the use of digital clinical consultations (telephone or video calls) within midwifery and nursing care. This paper reports on a realist review project related to maternity care that seeks to illuminate for whom such consultations can safely and acceptably be used, how, for what purposes and in what contexts. This paper addresses the first phase of a realist enquiry - initial programme theory development - focusing particularly on the role of stakeholder involvement (including digital transformation leaders, midwives, obstetricians, service users and community organisations). Three sub-stages of initial programme theory development are described highlighting the contribution of stakeholder groups to each stage: (i) consultation to focus the review question, (ii) focused searching and (iii) further consultation. Realist literature searching strategies yielded limited theory-rich evidence on digital consultations. Stakeholders provided essential additional contributions resulting in the development of 13 initial programme theories and a conceptual framework. More research on the implementation of virtual midwifery/nursing consultations is needed. Nursing/midwifery digital researchers should involve stakeholders to help shape research priorities, deepen contextual understanding and sense-check emerging findings.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The COVID pandemic prompted an increase in the use of digital clinical consultations (telephone or video calls) within midwifery and nursing care. This paper reports on a realist review project related to maternity care that seeks to illuminate for whom such consultations can safely and acceptably be used, how, for what purposes and in what contexts.
Aims UNASSIGNED
This paper addresses the first phase of a realist enquiry - initial programme theory development - focusing particularly on the role of stakeholder involvement (including digital transformation leaders, midwives, obstetricians, service users and community organisations).
Methods UNASSIGNED
Three sub-stages of initial programme theory development are described highlighting the contribution of stakeholder groups to each stage: (i) consultation to focus the review question, (ii) focused searching and (iii) further consultation.
Results UNASSIGNED
Realist literature searching strategies yielded limited theory-rich evidence on digital consultations. Stakeholders provided essential additional contributions resulting in the development of 13 initial programme theories and a conceptual framework.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
More research on the implementation of virtual midwifery/nursing consultations is needed. Nursing/midwifery digital researchers should involve stakeholders to help shape research priorities, deepen contextual understanding and sense-check emerging findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39070565
doi: 10.1177/17449871241226911
pii: 10.1177_17449871241226911
pmc: PMC11271666
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

127-140

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Catrin Evans (C)

Professor in Evidence Based Healthcare, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Georgia Clancy (G)

Research Fellow, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Kerry Evans (K)

Senior Clinical Academic Midwife and Associate Professor, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Andrew Booth (A)

Professor in Evidence Synthesis, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Benash Nazmeen (B)

Assistant Professor, School of Allied Health Professionals and Midwifery, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.

Stephen Timmons (S)

Professor of Health Services Management, Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Candice Sunney (C)

Lay Researcher, Nottingham Maternity Research Network, Nottingham, UK.

Mark Clowes (M)

Information Scientist, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Nia Wyn Jones (NW)

Clinical Associate Professor, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Sheffield, UK.

Helen Spiby (H)

Professor of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Classifications MeSH