Reliability of Angle Measurements Based on the Epiphyseal Scar for Knee Osteotomy: An International Multicenter Radiographic Study.
angle
growth plate–tibial plateau
knee osteotomy
measurement reliability
modified tibial bone varus angle
planning
tibial bone varus angle
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
25
09
2023
accepted:
15
11
2023
medline:
29
7
2024
pubmed:
29
7
2024
entrez:
29
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The proximal tibial epiphyseal inclination can be used as a prognostic factor for good results after knee osteotomy and measured using the tibial bone varus angle (TBVA). This angle depends on the visibility of the epiphyseal plate, which has shown poor reproducibility when measured on standard radiographs by conventional methods. To evaluate the measurement reliability of the TBVA and other angles based on the epiphyseal scar using a digital image display. Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. A total of 100 whole-leg radiographs were analyzed twice by 3 orthopaedic surgeons from 2 countries in a blinded and randomized manner. Observers measured the hip-knee-ankle angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, and TBVA. The growth plate-tibial plateau (GPTP) angle, defined as the angle between the epiphyseal scar and tibial plateau, was measured; this angle has not yet been described for osteotomy. In addition, a modified version of the TBVA (mTBVA), defined as that between the epiphyseal scar, its center, and the center of the talus, was measured. The Ahlbäck score for osteoarthritis and a 3-grade score for epiphyseal scar visibility were also determined. The reliability of the angle measurements and scoring was evaluated using the Fleiss kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The scores for epiphyseal scar visibility showed fair interobserver (Fleiss kappa correlation coefficient [κ] = 0.29-0.35) and strong intraobserver (Fleiss κ = 0.62-0.69) reliability. TBVA, GPTP angle, and mTBVA measurements showed good interobserver reliability (ICC, 0.76-0.77), while the GPTP angle achieved excellent intraobserver reliability (ICC, >0.9). Using digital image display, angles that depend on the epiphyseal scar-such as TBVA, GPTP angle, and mTBVA-can achieve acceptable measurement reliability despite the low agreement on the visibility of the epiphyseal scar.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The proximal tibial epiphyseal inclination can be used as a prognostic factor for good results after knee osteotomy and measured using the tibial bone varus angle (TBVA). This angle depends on the visibility of the epiphyseal plate, which has shown poor reproducibility when measured on standard radiographs by conventional methods.
Purpose
UNASSIGNED
To evaluate the measurement reliability of the TBVA and other angles based on the epiphyseal scar using a digital image display.
Study Design
UNASSIGNED
Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A total of 100 whole-leg radiographs were analyzed twice by 3 orthopaedic surgeons from 2 countries in a blinded and randomized manner. Observers measured the hip-knee-ankle angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, and TBVA. The growth plate-tibial plateau (GPTP) angle, defined as the angle between the epiphyseal scar and tibial plateau, was measured; this angle has not yet been described for osteotomy. In addition, a modified version of the TBVA (mTBVA), defined as that between the epiphyseal scar, its center, and the center of the talus, was measured. The Ahlbäck score for osteoarthritis and a 3-grade score for epiphyseal scar visibility were also determined. The reliability of the angle measurements and scoring was evaluated using the Fleiss kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results
UNASSIGNED
The scores for epiphyseal scar visibility showed fair interobserver (Fleiss kappa correlation coefficient [κ] = 0.29-0.35) and strong intraobserver (Fleiss κ = 0.62-0.69) reliability. TBVA, GPTP angle, and mTBVA measurements showed good interobserver reliability (ICC, 0.76-0.77), while the GPTP angle achieved excellent intraobserver reliability (ICC, >0.9).
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Using digital image display, angles that depend on the epiphyseal scar-such as TBVA, GPTP angle, and mTBVA-can achieve acceptable measurement reliability despite the low agreement on the visibility of the epiphyseal scar.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39070899
doi: 10.1177/23259671241252812
pii: 10.1177_23259671241252812
pmc: PMC11283665
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
23259671241252812Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2024.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: P.S. created and maintains Tyche software. J.-F.G. has received consulting fees from Amplitude. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.