Islands in the stream: a qualitative study on the accessibility of mental health care for persons with substance use disorders in Belgium.

accessibility mental health care recovery substance use disorders treatment services

Journal

Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 24 11 2023
accepted: 01 07 2024
medline: 29 7 2024
pubmed: 29 7 2024
entrez: 29 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Persons with substance use disorders (SUD) make up a considerable proportion of mental health care service users worldwide. Since 2010, Belgian mental health care has undergone a nationwide reform ('Title 107') aiming to realize a mental health care system that fosters more intensive collaboration, strengthens the cohesion and integration across and between different services, and is more responsive to the support needs of all service users. Although persons with SUD were named as a prioritized target group, how this reform impacted the lives and recovery journeys of persons with SUD remains understudied. This study aims to investigate how persons with SUD, regardless of whether they have co-occurring mental health issues, experience the accessibility of mental health care in light of the 'Title 107' reform. Data were collected by means of in-depth interviews with a heterogeneous sample of persons with SUD (n=52), recruited from five regional mental health networks in Belgium. In-depth interviews focused on experiences regarding (history of) substance use, accessibility of services and support needs, and were analyzed thematically. Five dynamic themes came to the fore: fragmentation of care and support, the importance of "really listening", balancing between treatment-driven and person-centered support, the ambivalent role of peers, and the impact of stigma. Despite the 'Title 107' reform, persons with SUD still experience mental health care services as 'islands in the stream', pointing to several pressing priorities for future policy and practice development: breaking the vicious cycles of waiting times, organizing relational case management, tackling stigma and centralizing lived experiences, and fostering recovery-promoting collaboration.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39071224
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1344020
pmc: PMC11272529
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1344020

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 De Ruysscher, Magerman, Goethals, Chantry, Sinclair, Delespaul, De Maeyer, Nicaise and Vanderplasschen.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Clara De Ruysscher (C)

Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Jürgen Magerman (J)

EQUALITY//ResearchCollective, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.

Ilse Goethals (I)

EQUALITY//ResearchCollective, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.

Mégane Chantry (M)

Institut de recherche santé et société, Université Catholique de Louvain, Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Belgium.

Deborah L Sinclair (DL)

Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Philippe Delespaul (P)

Vakgroep Psychiatrie en Neuropsychologie, Universiteit van Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Jessica De Maeyer (J)

EQUALITY//ResearchCollective, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.

Pablo Nicaise (P)

Institut de recherche santé et société, Université Catholique de Louvain, Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Belgium.

Wouter Vanderplasschen (W)

Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH