Perfusion Mapping of Flaps Using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography and Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging.


Journal

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 13 10 2023
accepted: 09 05 2024
medline: 29 7 2024
pubmed: 29 7 2024
entrez: 29 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) is often used for assessing tissue circulation in reconstructive surgery. Indocyanine green (ICG) is injected intravenously and visualized in the tissue with an infrared camera. The information is used to plan the surgery, for example, in free flap breast reconstructions. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is another method that uses laser to assess tissue perfusion in the skin. Unlike ICG-FA, LSCI is noninvasive and may therefore have an advantaged compared with ICG-FA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between information obtained from these two techniques. Five deep inferior epigastric perforator patients were included. The flaps were assessed with LSCI and ICG-FA. For LSCI, the perfusion was calculated in 32 regions of interest. For ICG-FA, the maximum slope and area under curve (AUC) were calculated based on average pixel intensity data. Large variations in maximum slope values could be seen between flaps, whereas AUC had lower variability within the same flap and between flaps. Pearson rank correlation comparing average perfusion (LSCI) and AUC (ICG-FA) showed a correlation between the values (r = 0.55, There is a significant correlation between data obtained using LSCI and ICG-FA, when ICG-FA data are presented as AUC of the ICG-FA intensity curve. Maximum slope lacks significant correlation with flap data obtained with LSCI. The study indicates that LSCI may be used in reconstructive surgery to assess tissue circulation in a way similar to ICG-FA.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) is often used for assessing tissue circulation in reconstructive surgery. Indocyanine green (ICG) is injected intravenously and visualized in the tissue with an infrared camera. The information is used to plan the surgery, for example, in free flap breast reconstructions. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is another method that uses laser to assess tissue perfusion in the skin. Unlike ICG-FA, LSCI is noninvasive and may therefore have an advantaged compared with ICG-FA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between information obtained from these two techniques.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Five deep inferior epigastric perforator patients were included. The flaps were assessed with LSCI and ICG-FA. For LSCI, the perfusion was calculated in 32 regions of interest. For ICG-FA, the maximum slope and area under curve (AUC) were calculated based on average pixel intensity data.
Results UNASSIGNED
Large variations in maximum slope values could be seen between flaps, whereas AUC had lower variability within the same flap and between flaps. Pearson rank correlation comparing average perfusion (LSCI) and AUC (ICG-FA) showed a correlation between the values (r = 0.55,
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
There is a significant correlation between data obtained using LSCI and ICG-FA, when ICG-FA data are presented as AUC of the ICG-FA intensity curve. Maximum slope lacks significant correlation with flap data obtained with LSCI. The study indicates that LSCI may be used in reconstructive surgery to assess tissue circulation in a way similar to ICG-FA.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39071769
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005964
pii: GOX-D-23-00942
pmc: PMC11281778
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e5964

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Auteurs

Johan Zötterman (J)

From the Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery and Burns and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Erik Tesselaar (E)

Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Sherif Elawa (S)

From the Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery and Burns and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Moustafa Elmasry (M)

From the Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery and Burns and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Simon Farnebo (S)

From the Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery and Burns and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH