Common practices of dental implant maintenance among dental hygienists working in the Netherlands - A survey.
dental hygienists
dental implants
education
survey
Journal
International journal of dental hygiene
ISSN: 1601-5037
Titre abrégé: Int J Dent Hyg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101168070
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jul 2024
28 Jul 2024
Historique:
revised:
14
02
2024
received:
06
08
2023
accepted:
23
04
2024
medline:
29
7
2024
pubmed:
29
7
2024
entrez:
29
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Dental implant maintenance is crucial to obtain and maintain a healthy peri-implant situation. Although it is part of a dental hygienists (DH) scope of practice, the knowledge and common practices among DHs in the Netherlands are unclear. A web-based survey was distributed by the Dutch Association of DHs, by spreading survey QR codes and snowballing. The role of the different DH curricula 2- or 3-year diploma and a 4-year bachelor's degree is evaluated. In total, 165 (diploma: 73, bachelor: 92) DHs responded. Peri-implant diseases were well known (98%), indices and clinical symptoms were used to assess peri-implant tissues. A periodontal probe (97%) was used and bone loss was evaluated on radiographs (89%). Treatment was performed supra- and subgingivally (69%), mostly by titanium (45%) or plastic hand instruments (42%). Ultrasonic (52%) and air-abrasive (52%) devices were often used. The recall interval for maintenance was based on a risk-adjusted protocol (70%). DHs with a bachelor's received significantly more training compared to DHs with a diploma during primary education (p < 0.001). Diploma DHs mainly obtained their knowledge from continuing education (p = 0.04). In general, there was no significant difference in knowledge or common practices. The primary education of DHs with a 2- or 3-year diploma and a 4-year bachelor's varies. Due to the continuing education of diploma DHs, knowledge and common practices generally do not differ. Most DHs in the Netherlands perform implant maintenance. A periodontal probe and radiographs are used for examination. Instrumentation is performed supra- and subgingivally, usually with titanium or plastic hand instruments. The recall interval is based on a patient's risk assessment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Dental implant maintenance is crucial to obtain and maintain a healthy peri-implant situation. Although it is part of a dental hygienists (DH) scope of practice, the knowledge and common practices among DHs in the Netherlands are unclear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
A web-based survey was distributed by the Dutch Association of DHs, by spreading survey QR codes and snowballing. The role of the different DH curricula 2- or 3-year diploma and a 4-year bachelor's degree is evaluated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In total, 165 (diploma: 73, bachelor: 92) DHs responded. Peri-implant diseases were well known (98%), indices and clinical symptoms were used to assess peri-implant tissues. A periodontal probe (97%) was used and bone loss was evaluated on radiographs (89%). Treatment was performed supra- and subgingivally (69%), mostly by titanium (45%) or plastic hand instruments (42%). Ultrasonic (52%) and air-abrasive (52%) devices were often used. The recall interval for maintenance was based on a risk-adjusted protocol (70%). DHs with a bachelor's received significantly more training compared to DHs with a diploma during primary education (p < 0.001). Diploma DHs mainly obtained their knowledge from continuing education (p = 0.04). In general, there was no significant difference in knowledge or common practices.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The primary education of DHs with a 2- or 3-year diploma and a 4-year bachelor's varies. Due to the continuing education of diploma DHs, knowledge and common practices generally do not differ. Most DHs in the Netherlands perform implant maintenance. A periodontal probe and radiographs are used for examination. Instrumentation is performed supra- and subgingivally, usually with titanium or plastic hand instruments. The recall interval is based on a patient's risk assessment.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Dental Hygiene published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Kassebaum NJ, Smith AGC, Bernabé E, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence, incidence, and disability‐adjusted life years for oral conditions for 195 countries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. J Dent Res. 2017;96(4):380‐387. doi:10.1177/0022034517693566
Chapple ILC, van der Weijden F, Doerfer C, et al. Primary prevention of periodontitis: managing gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(S16):S71‐S76. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12366
Jepsen S, Blanco J, Buchalla W, et al. Prevention and control of dental caries and periodontal diseases at individual and population level: consensus report of group 3 of joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries between caries and periodontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44:S85‐S93. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12687
Kennisinstituut Mondzorg (KIMO). Klinische Praktijkrichtlijn (KPR) peri‐implantaire infecties. 2018. www.hetkimo.nl
Caton JG, Armitage G, Berglundh T, et al. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri‐implant diseases and conditions – Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45:S1‐S8. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12935
Derks J, Tomasi C. Peri‐implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(S16):S158‐S171. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12334
Renvert S, Polyzois I. Risk indicators for peri‐implant mucositis: a systematic literature review. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(S16):S172‐S186. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12346
Jepsen S, Berglundh T, Genco R, et al. Primary prevention of peri‐implantitis: managing peri‐implant mucositis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(S16):S152‐S157. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12369
Salvi GE, Ramseier CA. Efficacy of patient‐administered mechanical and/or chemical plaque control protocols in the management of peri‐implant mucositis. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(S16):S187‐S201. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12321
Louropoulou A, Slot DE, van der Weijden F. Mechanical self‐performed oral hygiene of implant supported restorations: a systematic review. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2014;14(Suppl):60‐69. doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.03.008.e1.
Renvert S, Roos‐Jansåker AM, Claffey N. Non‐surgical treatment of peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis: A literature review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:305‐315. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01276.x
Schwarz F, Becker K, Sager M. Efficacy of professionally administered plaque removal with or without adjunctive measures for the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis. A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(S16):S202‐S213. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12349
Costa FO, Takenaka‐Martinez S, Cota LOM, Ferreira SD, Silva GLM, Costa JE. Peri‐implant disease in subjects with and without preventive maintenance: a 5‐year follow‐up. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(2):173‐181. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01819.x
Herrera D, Berglundh T, Schwarz F, et al. Prevention and treatment of peri‐implant diseases—the EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline. J Clin Periodontol. 2023;50(S26):4‐76. doi:10.1111/jcpe.13823
Öhrn K, Howell Y, Fugill M, Field J. A common European curriculum for dental hygiene ‐ domain III: patient‐centred care. Eur J Dent Educ. 2020;24(4):622‐625. doi:10.1111/eje.12510
Jongbloed‐Zoet C, Bol‐van den Hil EM, la Rivière‐Ilsen J, van der Sanden‐Stoelinga MS. Dental hygienists in The Netherlands: the past, present and future. Int J Dent Hyg. 2012;10(3):148‐154. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00573.x
Ministerie van Volksgezondheid W en S. BIG register. https://www.bigregister.nl/https://www.bigregister.nl/actueel/nieuws/2018/07/8/zelfstandige‐bevoegdheden‐voor‐mondhygienisten
Eickholz P, Winkler P, Elez I, Slutzkey G, Saminsky M. Common practices of dental implants maintenance among dental hygiene professionals in Israel and Germany. Int J Dent Hyg. 2023;21:251‐258. doi:10.1111/idh.12612
Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T, et al. A consensus‐based checklist for reporting of survey studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(10):3179‐3187. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1
Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet E‐surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e34. doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
Commissie Regelgeving Onderzoek (COREON). Gedragscode Gezondheidsonderzoek. Commissie Regelgeving Onderzoek (COREON); 2022.
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Regulations Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Protection of Natural Persons with regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union; 2016.
Qualtrics. Provo, UT, USA. 2005. https://www.qualtrics.com
Mokkink Cecilia AC, Prinsen Donald L, Patrick Jordi Alonso Lex M, Bouter LB, Mokkink CL. COSMIN study design checklist for patient‐reported outcome measurement instruments. www.cosmin.nl
Strooker H, Rohn S, Van Winkelhoff A. Clinical and microbiologic effects of chemical versus mechanical cleansing in professional supportive implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:845‐850.
Armstrong RA. When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34(5):502‐508. doi:10.1111/opo.12131
Wu MJ, Zhao K, Fils‐Aime F. Response rates of online surveys in published research: a meta‐analysis. Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2022;7:100206. doi:10.1016/J.CHBR.2022.100206
Vis EBA, Nederlands instituut voor onderzoek van de gezondheidszorg (Utrecht), Stichting “Capaciteitsorgaan voor de medische en tandheelkundige vervolgopleidingen”. Het Aanbod Aan Tandartsen En Mondhygiënisten in Nederland : Een Enquête‐Onderzoek Ten Behoeve van de Raming Eerstelijns Mondzorg 2019 van Het Capaciteitsorgaan. Nivel; 2020.
Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. The impact of oral implants‐past and future, 1966–2042. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005;71:327.
Ward ST, Czuszak CA, Thompson AL, Downey MC, Collins MA. Assessment and maintenance of dental implants: clinical and knowledge‐seeking practices of dental hygienists. J Dent Hyg. 2012;86(2):104‐110.
Vereniging Van Mondhygiënisten N. Beroepsprofiel Mondhygiënist in Nederland. https://www.nvmmondhygienisten.nl/nieuws/beroepsprofiel‐2019‐nu‐online/
Folwaczny M, Rudolf T, Frasheri I, Betthäuser M. Ultrastructural changes of smooth and rough titanium implant surfaces induced by metal and plastic periodontal probes. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(1):105‐114. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03341-1
Coli P, Sennerby L. Is peri‐implant probing causing over‐DIAGNOSIS and over‐treatment of dental implants? J Clin Med. 2019;8(8):1123. doi:10.3390/jcm8081123
Lindhe J, Meyle J. Peri‐implant diseases: consensus report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:282‐285. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01283.x
Mann M, Parmar D, Walmsley AD, Lea SC. Effect of plastic‐covered ultrasonic scalers on titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(1):76‐82. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02186.x
Rühling A, Kocher T, Kreusch J, Plagmann H‐C. Treatment of subgingival implant surfaces with Teflon®‐coated sonic and ultrasonic scaler tips and various implant curettes. An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5(1):19‐29. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050103.x
Tan SL, Grewal GK, Mohamed Nazari NS, Mohd‐Dom TN, Baharuddin NA. Efficacy of air polishing in comparison with hand instruments and/or power‐driven instruments in supportive periodontal therapy and implant maintenance: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):85. doi:10.1186/s12903-022-02120-6
Jongbloed‐Zoet C, Nyblom Y, Bol E, Field JC. A common European curriculum for dental hygiene. Eur J Dent Educ. 2020;24(4):611‐615. doi:10.1111/eje.12501
Bozia M, Berkhout E, van der Weijden F, Slot DE. Anaesthesia and caries treatment by dental hygienists: a worldwide review. Int Dent J. 2022;1:288‐295. doi:10.1016/j.identj.2022.08.013
Bozia M, Berkhout E, van der Weijden F, Slot DE. Worldwide review of dental hygienists' extended scope of practice in radiology: dental hygienists' extended scope of practice in radiology. Int Dent J. 2022;72(3):373‐380. doi:10.1016/j.identj.2021.05.010
Cheung MC, Hopcraft MS, Darby IB. Dental implant hygiene and maintenance protocols: a survey of oral health practitioners in australia. Am Dent Hyg Assoc. 2021;95:25‐35.