Male contraception: Focus on behavioral and barrier methods.
acceptability
accessibility
affordability
behavioral strategies
effectiveness
male condom
male contraception
safety
Journal
Andrology
ISSN: 2047-2927
Titre abrégé: Andrology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101585129
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Jul 2024
29 Jul 2024
Historique:
revised:
19
07
2024
received:
30
05
2024
accepted:
22
07
2024
medline:
30
7
2024
pubmed:
30
7
2024
entrez:
30
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Male contraception includes various methods designed to prevent pregnancy by focusing on the male's role in reproduction. Behavioral methods, such as withdrawal and periodic abstinence, offer non-invasive alternatives that require self-control and precise timing to avoid depositing sperm in the female reproductive tract during fertile periods. However, these methods generally have low effectiveness and rely heavily on user adherence and experience. The male condom, a barrier method, provides both contraception and protection against sexually transmitted infections. Its effectiveness relies on correct and consistent use. Access to comprehensive sexual education and medical counseling is essential to dispel the stigma surrounding contraceptive use and correct misconceptions, ensuring proper usage and ultimately contributing to better reproductive health outcomes.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.
Références
Canning D, Karra M. Unwanted family planning: prevalence estimates for 56 countries. Stud Fam Plann. 2023;54(1):75‐93.
Moroole MA, Materechera SA, Otang‐Mbeng W, Aremu AO. African indigenous contraception: a review. Afr J Reprod Health. 2020;24(4):173‐184.
Daniels K, Abma JC. Contraceptive methods women have ever used: United States, 2015–2019. Natl Health Stat Report. 2023(195):1‐18.
Handelsman DJ. Male contraception. in: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, eds. Endotext. MDText.com, Inc.; 2000. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279094/. [cited 2024 Mar 3].
Ott MA, Sucato GS; Committee on Adolescence. Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics. 2014;134(4):e1257‐e1281.
Talmac MA, Yuksek SC, Afsar S, Bestel A, Gunay I, Ozdemir I. How do contraception preferences change over time? Eight years of experience in a tertiary hospital. Saudi Med J. 2024;45(1):93‐97.
Howard SA, Benhabbour SR. Non‐hormonal contraception. J Clin Med. 2023;12(14):4791.
Shilaih M, Goodale BM, Falco L, Kübler F, De Clerck V, Leeners B. Modern fertility awareness methods: wrist wearables capture the changes in temperature associated with the menstrual cycle. Biosci Rep. 2018;38(6):BSR20171279. doi:10.1042/BSR20171279
Duane M, Stanford JB, Porucznik CA, Vigil P. Fertility awareness‐based methods for women's health and family planning. Front Med. 2022;9:858977. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.858977
Peters A, Mahdy H. Symptothermal Contraception. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564316/
Berglund Scherwitzl E, Lundberg O, Kopp Kallner H, Gemzell Danielsson K, Trussell J, Scherwitzl R. Perfect‐use and typical‐use pearl index of a contraceptive mobile app. Contraception. 2017;96(6):420‐425. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.08.014
Manhart MD, Duane M. A comparison of app‐defined fertile days from two fertility tracking apps using identical cycle data. Contraception. 2022;115:12‐16.
Ross J, Hardee K. Use of male methods of contraception worldwide. J Biosoc Sci. 2017;49(5):648‐663.
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). 2023 UNAIDS GLOBAL AIDS UPDATE.pdf [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Jan 13]. Available from: https://thepath.unaids.org/wp‐content/themes/unaids2023/assets/files/2023_report.pdf
WHO. WHO model list of essential medicines ‐ 23rd list, 2023 [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications‐detail‐redirect/WHO‐MHP‐HPS‐EML‐2023.02
Evans WD, Ulasevich A, Hatheway M, Deperthes B. Systematic review of peer‐reviewed literature on global condom promotion programs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7):2262.
Evans W, Kadirov K, Thior I, Ganesan R, Ulasevich A, Deperthes B. Willingness to pay for condoms among men in Sub‐Saharan Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(1):34.
Wu M, McIntosh J, Liu J. Current prevalence rate of latex allergy: why it remains a problem? Int J Occup Health. 2016;58(2):138‐144.
Gallo MF, Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF. Non‐latex versus latex male condoms for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2006(1):CD003550.
Wang C, Meriggiola MC, Amory JK, et al. Practice and development of male contraception: European Academy of Andrology and American Society of Andrology guidelines. Andrology. 2023;16.
Bradley SEK, Polis CB, Bankole A, Croft T. Global contraceptive failure rates: who is most at risk? Stud Fam Plann. 2019;50(1):3‐24.
WHO. Family planning—a global handbook for providers, 2022 edition [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 10] Available from: https://www.who.int/publications‐detail‐redirect/9780999203705
Barrett M, Laris BA, Anderson P, et al. Condom use and error experience among young adolescents: implications for classroom instruction. Health Promot Pract. 2021;22(3):313‐317.
Sanders SA, Yarber WL, Kaufman EL, Crosby RA, Graham CA, Milhausen RR. Condom use errors and problems: a global view. Sex Health. 2012;9(1):81‐95.
Cason P, Cwiak C, Edelman A, et al. Contraceptive technology. 22nd edition. Burlington: MA: Jones‐Bartlett Learning; 2023.
Suzuki Y, Kosaka M, Yamamoto K, et al. Association between syphilis incidence and dating app use in Japan. JMA J. 2020;3(2):109‐117.
Garga S, Thomas MT, Bhatia A, Sullivan A, John‐Leader F, Pit SW. Motivations, dating app relationships, unintended consequences and change in sexual behaviour in dating app users at an Australian music festival. Harm Reduct J. 2021;18(1):49.
Weller S, Davis K. Condom effectiveness in reducing heterosexual HIV transmission. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(1):CD003255.
Wang Z, Yu J. Efficacy evaluation of thickened condom in the treatment of premature ejaculation. Transl Androl Urol. 2022;11(2):253‐259.
Janssen E, Sanders SA, Hill BJ, et al. Patterns of sexual arousal in young, heterosexual men who experience condom‐associated erection problems (CAEP). J Sex Med. 2014;11(9):2285‐2291.
Korkes F, Costa‐Matos A, Gasperini R, Reginato PV, Perez MDC. Recreational use of PDE5 inhibitors by young healthy men: recognizing this issue among medical students. J Sex Med. 2008;5(10):2414‐2418.
Sanders SA, Hill BJ, Janssen E, et al. General erectile functioning among young, heterosexual men who do and do not report condom‐associated erection problems (CAEP). J Sex Med. 2015;12(9):1897‐1904.
Broderick K, Aristide C, Bullington BW, Mwanga‐Amumpaire J, Downs JA, Sundararajan R. Stigma of infidelity associated with condom use explains low rates of condom uptake: qualitative data from Uganda and Tanzania. Reprod Health. 2023;20(1):12.