Dose variations for biopsy, puncture and drainage under CT guidance: A national survey in 1709 patients.

Multidetector computed tomography Physics Radiation exposure Radiology, interventional

Journal

Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging
ISSN: 2772-6525
Titre abrégé: Res Diagn Interv Imaging
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9918574385706676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 13 09 2022
accepted: 14 02 2023
medline: 1 3 2023
pubmed: 1 3 2023
entrez: 30 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A nation-wide study recently published the dose reference levels for the main CT-guided interventional procedures in 5001 patients. We assessed the impact of patient's age, sex and targeted organ on the patient dose during thoracic and abdominopelvic biopsies and punctures/drainages. Data were extracted from the previous nationwide study. All biopsies, punctures and drainages for thoracic or abdominopelvic locations performed between January 2017 and June 2019 in all participating centers were included in the study. Multivariable analyses were carried out using a linear regression of the dose-length product (DLP) log, adjusted to age, sex, anatomical location, number of helical acquisitions and inclusion center. Of the 5001 patients of the initial study, 2383 benefited from thoracic or abdominopelvic procedures, including 674 percutaneous destructions excluded. 1709 patients (44 centers), 1045 men, 664 women, median age 64.4 ± 14.0 years were included. The mean DLP was 751.2 ± 642.7mGy.cm. It was significantly higher in men than women ( Doses delivered to patients for abdominal and thoracic biopsies and punctures/drainages performed under CT guidance depend on gender and location. Furthers studies taking into account the patient's morphology and anatomical location of the procedure would allow proposing finer dose reference levels.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
A nation-wide study recently published the dose reference levels for the main CT-guided interventional procedures in 5001 patients. We assessed the impact of patient's age, sex and targeted organ on the patient dose during thoracic and abdominopelvic biopsies and punctures/drainages.
Patients and methods UNASSIGNED
Data were extracted from the previous nationwide study. All biopsies, punctures and drainages for thoracic or abdominopelvic locations performed between January 2017 and June 2019 in all participating centers were included in the study. Multivariable analyses were carried out using a linear regression of the dose-length product (DLP) log, adjusted to age, sex, anatomical location, number of helical acquisitions and inclusion center.
Results UNASSIGNED
Of the 5001 patients of the initial study, 2383 benefited from thoracic or abdominopelvic procedures, including 674 percutaneous destructions excluded. 1709 patients (44 centers), 1045 men, 664 women, median age 64.4 ± 14.0 years were included. The mean DLP was 751.2 ± 642.7mGy.cm. It was significantly higher in men than women (
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Doses delivered to patients for abdominal and thoracic biopsies and punctures/drainages performed under CT guidance depend on gender and location. Furthers studies taking into account the patient's morphology and anatomical location of the procedure would allow proposing finer dose reference levels.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39076162
doi: 10.1016/j.redii.2023.100025
pii: S2772-6525(23)00004-2
pmc: PMC11265189
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100025

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Laure Berny (L)

Department of medical imaging, CHU de Nîmes, université de Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nîmes, place du Pr.-Robert-Debré, 30029 Nîmes, France.

Joël Greffier (J)

Department of medical imaging, CHU de Nîmes, université de Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nîmes, place du Pr.-Robert-Debré, 30029 Nîmes, France.

Chris Serrand (C)

Department of biostatistics, clinical epidemiology, public health, and innovation in methodology (BESPIM), CHU de Nîmes, place du Pr.-Robert-Debré, 30029 Nîmes, France.

Djamel Dabli (D)

Department of medical imaging, CHU de Nîmes, université de Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nîmes, place du Pr.-Robert-Debré, 30029 Nîmes, France.

Fabien De Oliveira (F)

Department of medical imaging, CHU de Nîmes, université de Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nîmes, place du Pr.-Robert-Debré, 30029 Nîmes, France.

Hélène de Forges (H)

Department of medical imaging, CHU de Nîmes, université de Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nîmes, place du Pr.-Robert-Debré, 30029 Nîmes, France.

Jean-Paul Beregi (JP)

Department of medical imaging, CHU de Nîmes, université de Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nîmes, place du Pr.-Robert-Debré, 30029 Nîmes, France.

Julien Frandon (J)

Department of medical imaging, CHU de Nîmes, université de Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nîmes, place du Pr.-Robert-Debré, 30029 Nîmes, France.

Classifications MeSH