Acute toxicity of chemotherapy in central nervous system germ cell tumour patients according to age.

adolescents adults age chemotherapy children germ cell tumour toxicity

Journal

Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 22 04 2024
accepted: 17 06 2024
medline: 30 7 2024
pubmed: 30 7 2024
entrez: 30 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

SIOP-CNS-GCT-II European trial was opened for the treatment of patients of any age with central nervous system germ cell tumour (CNS-GCT). Four courses of pre-irradiation chemotherapy were delivered. The influence of patient age on chemotherapy related acute toxicity (CRAT) was assessed. CRAT was analysed according to age-groups: children (aged ≤11 years), adolescents (aged 12-17 years), adults (aged ≥18 years) and to chemotherapy type: CarboPEI (alternating etoposide-carboplatin/etoposide-ifosfamide) for non-metastatic germinoma; PEI (cisplatin-etoposide-ifosfamide) for standard-risk non-germinomatous GCT (NGGCT); PEI and high-dose PEI (HD-PEI), for high-risk or poorly responsive NGGCTs. 296 patients were assessable for CRAT: 105 children, 121 adolescents, 70 adults (max age: 41 years). Median cumulative doses/m² of chemotherapy were similar among age-groups. The proportion of germinoma over NGGCT (and accordingly use of CarboPEI chemotherapy) was higher in the adult groups (79%) versus the other two groups (62%). Delay in chemotherapy ≥7 days was noticed in 27%, 38%, and 19% of children, adolescents, and adults, respectively. Grade ≥3 haematological and non-haematological adverse events (AEs) were observed in 94%/31%, 97%/36%, and 77%/21% of children, adolescents, and adults, respectively. No toxic death was reported. Grade ≥3 AEs and delayed chemotherapies were significantly rarer in adults when compared with adolescents, even when adjusted on chemotherapy type: odds ratio: 0.1 [95%CI 0.02-0.4], and 0.2 [95%CI 0.1-0.4] in the group treated with CarboPEI. Adult patients can be treated safely with a chemotherapy intensive protocol, with even less toxicity than that observed in adolescents. Further work is required to understand age-related differences regarding toxicity.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
SIOP-CNS-GCT-II European trial was opened for the treatment of patients of any age with central nervous system germ cell tumour (CNS-GCT). Four courses of pre-irradiation chemotherapy were delivered. The influence of patient age on chemotherapy related acute toxicity (CRAT) was assessed.
Methods UNASSIGNED
CRAT was analysed according to age-groups: children (aged ≤11 years), adolescents (aged 12-17 years), adults (aged ≥18 years) and to chemotherapy type: CarboPEI (alternating etoposide-carboplatin/etoposide-ifosfamide) for non-metastatic germinoma; PEI (cisplatin-etoposide-ifosfamide) for standard-risk non-germinomatous GCT (NGGCT); PEI and high-dose PEI (HD-PEI), for high-risk or poorly responsive NGGCTs.
Results UNASSIGNED
296 patients were assessable for CRAT: 105 children, 121 adolescents, 70 adults (max age: 41 years). Median cumulative doses/m² of chemotherapy were similar among age-groups. The proportion of germinoma over NGGCT (and accordingly use of CarboPEI chemotherapy) was higher in the adult groups (79%) versus the other two groups (62%). Delay in chemotherapy ≥7 days was noticed in 27%, 38%, and 19% of children, adolescents, and adults, respectively. Grade ≥3 haematological and non-haematological adverse events (AEs) were observed in 94%/31%, 97%/36%, and 77%/21% of children, adolescents, and adults, respectively. No toxic death was reported. Grade ≥3 AEs and delayed chemotherapies were significantly rarer in adults when compared with adolescents, even when adjusted on chemotherapy type: odds ratio: 0.1 [95%CI 0.02-0.4], and 0.2 [95%CI 0.1-0.4] in the group treated with CarboPEI.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Adult patients can be treated safely with a chemotherapy intensive protocol, with even less toxicity than that observed in adolescents. Further work is required to understand age-related differences regarding toxicity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39077474
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1421418
pmc: PMC11284053
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1421418

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Palenzuela, Schiffler, Frappaz, Peyrl, Gerber, Kortmann, Philippe, Zimmermann, Murray, Nicholson, Calaminus and Faure-Conter.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Gilles Palenzuela (G)

University Hospital, Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Montpellier, France.

Camille Schiffler (C)

Department of Biostatistics, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Didier Frappaz (D)

Department of Pediatric Oncology, Institut d'Hémato-oncologie Pédiatrique, Lyon, France.

Andreas Peyrl (A)

Department of Paediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Nicolas U Gerber (NU)

Department of Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.

Rolf-Dieter Kortmann (RD)

Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.

Michael Philippe (M)

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Martin Zimmermann (M)

Department of Paediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Matthew J Murray (MJ)

Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

James C Nicholson (JC)

Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Gabriele Calaminus (G)

Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Cécile Faure-Conter (C)

Department of Pediatric Oncology, Institut d'Hémato-oncologie Pédiatrique, Lyon, France.

Classifications MeSH