Comparison between Track Technique and Conventional Approach for Measuring Artificial Chordae in the Treatment of Anterior Leaflet Prolapse and Flail during Mitral Valve Repair.

artificial chordae tendinea height measurement mitral valve reconstruction mitral valve regurgitation

Journal

Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 1530-6550
Titre abrégé: Rev Cardiovasc Med
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 100960007

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 13 03 2023
revised: 20 05 2023
accepted: 02 06 2023
medline: 30 7 2024
pubmed: 30 7 2024
entrez: 30 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Measuring the chordae tendineae for mitral valve reconstruction is feasible with various techniques. However, the effect of different strategies on the durability of plastics at follow-up is unknown. The study aims to compare a conventional surgical technique for measuring artificial chordae length with our new approach, defined "track technique". We compared the results of patients with anterior leaflet prolapse/flail who underwent mitral valve reconstruction by implanting artificial chordae from January 2020 to January 2022; 22 patients were operated on with a conventional technique, and 25 with our new alternative, "track technique". Clinical and transesophageal echocardiography data were collected postoperatively and at 2 years of follow-up. The primary outcome was freedom from mitral regurgitation. Secondary outcomes were presentation with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class The patients of the 2 groups had comparable preoperative risk factors regarding the LogEuroSCORE ( We devised both techniques to prove effective in achieving good valvular continence, but a significantly greater coaptation length was obtained with our track technique at the 2 years follow-up.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Measuring the chordae tendineae for mitral valve reconstruction is feasible with various techniques. However, the effect of different strategies on the durability of plastics at follow-up is unknown. The study aims to compare a conventional surgical technique for measuring artificial chordae length with our new approach, defined "track technique".
Methods UNASSIGNED
We compared the results of patients with anterior leaflet prolapse/flail who underwent mitral valve reconstruction by implanting artificial chordae from January 2020 to January 2022; 22 patients were operated on with a conventional technique, and 25 with our new alternative, "track technique". Clinical and transesophageal echocardiography data were collected postoperatively and at 2 years of follow-up. The primary outcome was freedom from mitral regurgitation. Secondary outcomes were presentation with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class
Results UNASSIGNED
The patients of the 2 groups had comparable preoperative risk factors regarding the LogEuroSCORE (
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
We devised both techniques to prove effective in achieving good valvular continence, but a significantly greater coaptation length was obtained with our track technique at the 2 years follow-up.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39077566
doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2410301
pii: S1530-6550(23)01047-5
pmc: PMC11273126
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

301

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Giuseppe Nasso is serving as one of the Guest editors of this journal. Giuseppe Santarpino is serving as one of the Guest editors and the Editorial Board members of this journal. We declare that Giuseppe Nasso and Giuseppe Santarpino had no involvement in the peer review of this article and have no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to Attila Nems and Michele Di Mauro.

Auteurs

Giuseppe Nasso (G)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Giuseppe Santarpino (G)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Città di Lecce Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Magna Graecia" University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.

Raffaele Bonifazi (R)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Flavio Fiore (F)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Gaetano Contegiacomo (G)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Felice Eugenio Agrò (FE)

Department of Anesthesiology, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital of Rome, 00128 Roma, Italy.

Ignazio Condello (I)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Giacomo Dimita (G)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Francesco Bartolomucci (F)

Department of Cardiology, Azienda Sanitaria Locale - BAT, 76123 Andria, Italy.

Khalil Fattouch (K)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Maria Eleonora Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 90135 Palermo, Italy.

Marco Moscarelli (M)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Maria Eleonora Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 90135 Palermo, Italy.

Nicola Di Bari (ND)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Giuseppe Speziale (G)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 00165 Rome, Italy.

Classifications MeSH