Effectiveness of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer by BRCA1/2 and a scar-based HRD signature in real-world practice.


Journal

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Jul 2024
Historique:
accepted: 26 07 2024
received: 22 04 2024
revised: 21 06 2024
medline: 30 7 2024
pubmed: 30 7 2024
entrez: 30 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To compare the effectiveness of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy (mPARPi) in real-world practice by biomarker status (BRCA1/2 alterations [BRCAalt] and a homologous recombination deficiency signature [HRDsig]) in advanced ovarian cancer (OC). Patients with OC receiving 1st-line platinum-based chemotherapy and either mPARPi or no maintenance were included. Patient data was obtained by a US-based de-identified OC clinico-genomic database, from ~280 US cancer clinics (01/2015-03/2023). Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (rwOS) were compared by biomarker status using Cox models, weighted by propensity scores. Of 673 patients, 160 received mPARPi [31.2% BRCAalt and 51.9% HRDsig(+)] and 513 no maintenance [15.6% BRCAalt and 34.1% HRDsig(+)]. BRCAalt patients receiving mPARPi vs. no maintenance had favorable rwPFS (HR 0.48, 95%CI 0.26-0.87, p=0.0154), as did BRCA wild-type (wt) (HR 0.76, 95%CI 0.57-1.01, p=0.0595). Favorable rwOS was not observed with mPARPi for BRCAalt or BRCAwt. HRDsig(+) patients receiving mPARPi vs. no maintenance had favorable rwPFS (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.24-0.55, p <0.001) and numerically favorable rwOS (HR 0.46, 95%CI 0.21-1.14, p=0.0561). No differences were observed for HRDsig(-). mPARPi treatment interaction was observed for HRDsig(+) vs. HRDsig(-) (rwPFS p<0.001 / rwOS p=0.016) but not for BRCAalt vs. BRCAwt. Patients BRCAwt/HRDsig(+) receiving mPARPi had favorable rwPFS (HR 0.40, 95%CI 0.22-0.72, p=0.003), while no difference was observed for BRCAwt/HRDsig(-). HRDsig predicted benefit of mPARPi better than BRCAalt. HRDsig(+) patients had favorable outcomes, even among BRCAwt patients, while HRDsig(-) patients showed no enrichment for benefit with mPARPi. HRDsig might predict benefit from mPARPi regardless of BRCAalt status.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39078736
pii: 746738
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1225
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Debra L Richardson (DL)

Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.

Julia C F Quintanilha (JCF)

Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Natalie Danziger (N)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States.

Gerald Li (G)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States.

Ethan Sokol (E)

Foundation Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Alexa B Schrock (AB)

Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States.

Ericka Ebot (E)

Foundation Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.

Neeru Bhardwaj (N)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Boston, United States.

Tanesha Norris (T)

Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Anosheh Afghani (A)

Flatiron Health (United States), United States.

Anthony Frachioni (A)

Flatiron Health (United States), United States.

Christina Washington (C)

University of Oklahoma, United States.

Lauren Dockery (L)

University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.

Julia Elvin (J)

Foundation Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Ryon P Graf (RP)

Foundation Medicine, San Diego, CA, United States.

Kathleen N Moore (KN)

Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.

Classifications MeSH