Vascular imaging for Stereoelectroencephalography: A safety and planning study.

Angiography Magnetic Resonance Imaging Stereoelectroencephalography

Journal

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia
ISSN: 1532-2653
Titre abrégé: J Clin Neurosci
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 9433352

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 08 03 2024
revised: 30 06 2024
accepted: 19 07 2024
medline: 31 7 2024
pubmed: 31 7 2024
entrez: 30 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a procedure used to localize the epileptogenic zone in patients with medically refractory epilepsy, involving the stereotactic implantation of electrodes into brain parenchyma. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Digital Subtraction Angiography, and Computed Tomography have been used preoperatively to prevent Intracranial Hemorrhage (ICH) by identifying electrode-vessel conflicts (EVC's) on planned electrode trajectories. There is variation in the use of Digital Subtraction Angiography and non-invasive sequences for vascular planning. Digital Subtraction Angiography provides high spatial resolution, but carries risks of arterial dissection, groin and retroperitoneal hematoma, and a 0.5-1.9% risk of stroke. Our group has incorporated Intravenous Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT A/V) Brain into our SEEG workflow, given its effective implementation in other neurosurgical domains. Primary aims include validating the safety of our CBCT A/V sequence for SEEG planning and determining if CBCT A/V is comparable to other modalities in detecting EVC's. Secondary aims include elucidating the relationship of conflicting vessel calibre with ICH incidence in SEEG using CBCT A/V imaging. A single-center retrospective study was conducted of 20 patients who underwent preoperative CBCT A/V Brain and MRI Brain with gadolinium enhancement, encompassing 273 electrode implantations from August 2020 - July 2023. The incidence and grade of post-implant, post-explant symptomatic ICH and asymptomatic ICH was noted. The total number of EVC's identifiable on MRI and CBCT A/V was recorded, along with average diameter of conflicting vessels. Across 20 patients and 273 implanted electrodes, there were four ICH events, where two were symptomatic and two were asymptomatic. The mean diameter of EVC's across all patients was 1.4 mm (±0.5). A significant difference (P < 0.0001) was observed between the number of EVC's that CBCT A/V could identify (20) compared to MRI (6). Two EVC's were identified in the region of two symptomatic ICH's, with the mean diameter of these conflicted vessels being 1.5 mm (±0.4). The two symptomatic ICH-associated EVC's were observed on CBCT A/V but not MRI. In our series, CBCT A/V demonstrates an acceptable safety profile for SEEG planning compared to other imaging modalities. CBCT A/V identified significantly more EVC's compared to MRI, including those contributing to transient symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. A conflicting vessel calibre of less than 1.2 mm on CBCT A/V did not contribute to ICH in our SEEG series.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a procedure used to localize the epileptogenic zone in patients with medically refractory epilepsy, involving the stereotactic implantation of electrodes into brain parenchyma. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Digital Subtraction Angiography, and Computed Tomography have been used preoperatively to prevent Intracranial Hemorrhage (ICH) by identifying electrode-vessel conflicts (EVC's) on planned electrode trajectories. There is variation in the use of Digital Subtraction Angiography and non-invasive sequences for vascular planning. Digital Subtraction Angiography provides high spatial resolution, but carries risks of arterial dissection, groin and retroperitoneal hematoma, and a 0.5-1.9% risk of stroke. Our group has incorporated Intravenous Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT A/V) Brain into our SEEG workflow, given its effective implementation in other neurosurgical domains. Primary aims include validating the safety of our CBCT A/V sequence for SEEG planning and determining if CBCT A/V is comparable to other modalities in detecting EVC's. Secondary aims include elucidating the relationship of conflicting vessel calibre with ICH incidence in SEEG using CBCT A/V imaging.
METHODS METHODS
A single-center retrospective study was conducted of 20 patients who underwent preoperative CBCT A/V Brain and MRI Brain with gadolinium enhancement, encompassing 273 electrode implantations from August 2020 - July 2023. The incidence and grade of post-implant, post-explant symptomatic ICH and asymptomatic ICH was noted. The total number of EVC's identifiable on MRI and CBCT A/V was recorded, along with average diameter of conflicting vessels.
RESULTS RESULTS
Across 20 patients and 273 implanted electrodes, there were four ICH events, where two were symptomatic and two were asymptomatic. The mean diameter of EVC's across all patients was 1.4 mm (±0.5). A significant difference (P < 0.0001) was observed between the number of EVC's that CBCT A/V could identify (20) compared to MRI (6). Two EVC's were identified in the region of two symptomatic ICH's, with the mean diameter of these conflicted vessels being 1.5 mm (±0.4). The two symptomatic ICH-associated EVC's were observed on CBCT A/V but not MRI.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In our series, CBCT A/V demonstrates an acceptable safety profile for SEEG planning compared to other imaging modalities. CBCT A/V identified significantly more EVC's compared to MRI, including those contributing to transient symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. A conflicting vessel calibre of less than 1.2 mm on CBCT A/V did not contribute to ICH in our SEEG series.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39079420
pii: S0967-5868(24)00289-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110762
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110762

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Matthew Szmidel (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Neuroscience, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Monash University, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: ma.szmidel@alfred.org.au.

Martin Hunn (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: M.Hunn@alfred.org.au.

Andrew Neal (A)

Department of Neuroscience, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Epilepsy Unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: A.Neal@alfred.org.au.

Joshua Laing (J)

Department of Neuroscience, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Epilepsy Unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: J.Laing@alfred.org.au.

Lisa Broadley (L)

Department of Radiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: L.Broadley@alfred.org.au.

Thanomporn Wittayacharoenpong (T)

Department of Neuroscience, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Monash University, VIC, Australia.

Terence O'brien (T)

Department of Neuroscience, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: te.obrien@alfred.org.au.

Matthew Gutman (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Neuroscience, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Monash University, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: M.Gutman@alfred.org.au.

Classifications MeSH