Cost-effectiveness of RSVpreF vaccine and nirsevimab for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus disease in Canadian infants.

Cost-effectiveness Cost-utility Nirsevimab RSV RSVpreF

Journal

Vaccine
ISSN: 1873-2518
Titre abrégé: Vaccine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406899

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 26 03 2024
revised: 17 07 2024
accepted: 18 07 2024
medline: 31 7 2024
pubmed: 31 7 2024
entrez: 30 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Health Canada recently authorized the RSVpreF pregnancy vaccine and nirsevimab to protect infants against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease. Assess the cost-effectiveness of RSVpreF and nirsevimab programs in preventing RSV disease in infants, compared to a palivizumab program. We used a static cohort model of a Canadian birth cohort during their first RSV season to estimate sequential incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2023 Canadian dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for nine strategies implemented over a one-year time period, from the health system and societal perspectives. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of uncertainties on the results. All-infants nirsevimab programs averted more RSV-related outcomes than year-round RSVpreF programs, with the most RSV cases averted in a seasonal nirsevimab program with catch-up. Assuming list prices for these immunizing agents, all-infants nirsevimab and year-round RSVpreF programs were never cost-effective, with ICERs far exceeding commonly used cost-effectiveness thresholds. Seasonal nirsevimab with catch-up for infants born outside the RSV season was a cost-effective program if prioritized for infants at moderate/high-risk (ICER <$28,000 per QALY) or those living in settings with higher RSV burden and healthcare costs, such as remote communities where transport would be complex (ICER of $5700 per QALY). Using a $50,000 per QALY threshold, an all-infants nirsevimab program could be optimal if nirsevimab is priced at <$110-190 per dose. A year-round RSVpreF for all pregnant women and pregnant people plus nirsevimab for infants at high-risk was optimal if nirsevimab is priced at >$110-190 per dose and RSVpreF priced at <$60-125 per dose. Prophylactic interventions can substantially reduce RSV disease in infants, and more focused nirsevimab programs are the most cost-effective option at current product prices.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Health Canada recently authorized the RSVpreF pregnancy vaccine and nirsevimab to protect infants against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Assess the cost-effectiveness of RSVpreF and nirsevimab programs in preventing RSV disease in infants, compared to a palivizumab program.
METHODS METHODS
We used a static cohort model of a Canadian birth cohort during their first RSV season to estimate sequential incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2023 Canadian dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for nine strategies implemented over a one-year time period, from the health system and societal perspectives. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of uncertainties on the results.
RESULTS RESULTS
All-infants nirsevimab programs averted more RSV-related outcomes than year-round RSVpreF programs, with the most RSV cases averted in a seasonal nirsevimab program with catch-up. Assuming list prices for these immunizing agents, all-infants nirsevimab and year-round RSVpreF programs were never cost-effective, with ICERs far exceeding commonly used cost-effectiveness thresholds. Seasonal nirsevimab with catch-up for infants born outside the RSV season was a cost-effective program if prioritized for infants at moderate/high-risk (ICER <$28,000 per QALY) or those living in settings with higher RSV burden and healthcare costs, such as remote communities where transport would be complex (ICER of $5700 per QALY). Using a $50,000 per QALY threshold, an all-infants nirsevimab program could be optimal if nirsevimab is priced at <$110-190 per dose. A year-round RSVpreF for all pregnant women and pregnant people plus nirsevimab for infants at high-risk was optimal if nirsevimab is priced at >$110-190 per dose and RSVpreF priced at <$60-125 per dose.
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
Prophylactic interventions can substantially reduce RSV disease in infants, and more focused nirsevimab programs are the most cost-effective option at current product prices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39079810
pii: S0264-410X(24)00827-2
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126164
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

126164

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Ellen Rafferty reports a relationship with Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada that includes: funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Gebremedhin B Gebretekle (GB)

Centre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Man Wah Yeung (MW)

Centre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Raphael Ximenes (R)

Centre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Alexandra Cernat (A)

Centre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Health Policy PhD Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Alison E Simmons (AE)

Centre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

April Killikelly (A)

Centre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Winnie Siu (W)

Centre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Ellen Rafferty (E)

Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Nicholas Brousseau (N)

Biological Risks Unit, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, Canada; Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

Matthew Tunis (M)

Centre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Ashleigh R Tuite (AR)

Centre for Immunization Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: ashleigh.tuite@phac-aspc.gc.ca.

Classifications MeSH