Understanding the delay in identifying Sudan Virus Disease: gaps in integrated disease surveillance and response and community-based surveillance to detect viral hemorrhagic fever outbreaks in Uganda, September 2022.
Ebola
Sudan Virus Disease
Surveillance
Uganda
Viral hemorrhagic fever
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Jul 2024
30 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
12
02
2024
accepted:
24
07
2024
medline:
31
7
2024
pubmed:
31
7
2024
entrez:
30
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early detection of outbreaks requires robust surveillance and reporting at both community and health facility levels. Uganda implements Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) for priority diseases and uses the national District Health Information System (DHIS2) for reporting. However, investigations after the first case in the 2022 Uganda Sudan virus outbreak was confirmed on September 20, 2022 revealed many community deaths among persons with Ebola-like symptoms as far back as August. Most had sought care at private facilities. We explored possible gaps in surveillance that may have resulted in late detection of the Sudan virus disease (SVD) outbreak in Uganda. Using a standardized tool, we evaluated core surveillance capacities at public and private health facilities at the hospital level and below in three sub-counties reporting the earliest SVD cases in the outbreak. Key informant interviews (KIIs) were conducted with 12 purposively-selected participants from the district local government. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with community members from six villages where early probable SVD cases were identified. KIIs and FGDs focused on experiences with SVD and Viral Hemorrhagic Fever (VHF) surveillance in the district. Thematic data analysis was used for qualitative data. Forty-six (85%) of 54 health facilities surveyed were privately-owned, among which 42 (91%) did not report to DHIS2 and 39 (85%) had no health worker trained on IDSR; both metrics were 100% in the eight public facilities. Weak community-based surveillance, poor private facility engagement, low suspicion index for VHF among health workers, inability of facilities to analyze and utilize surveillance data, lack of knowledge about to whom to report, funding constraints for surveillance activities, lack of IDSR training, and lack of all-cause mortality surveillance were identified as gaps potentially contributing to delayed outbreak detection. Both systemic and knowledge-related gaps in IDSR surveillance in SVD-affected districts contributed to the delayed detection of the 2022 Uganda SVD outbreak. Targeted interventions to address these gaps in both public and private facilities across Uganda could help avert similar situations in the future.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Early detection of outbreaks requires robust surveillance and reporting at both community and health facility levels. Uganda implements Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) for priority diseases and uses the national District Health Information System (DHIS2) for reporting. However, investigations after the first case in the 2022 Uganda Sudan virus outbreak was confirmed on September 20, 2022 revealed many community deaths among persons with Ebola-like symptoms as far back as August. Most had sought care at private facilities. We explored possible gaps in surveillance that may have resulted in late detection of the Sudan virus disease (SVD) outbreak in Uganda.
METHODS
METHODS
Using a standardized tool, we evaluated core surveillance capacities at public and private health facilities at the hospital level and below in three sub-counties reporting the earliest SVD cases in the outbreak. Key informant interviews (KIIs) were conducted with 12 purposively-selected participants from the district local government. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with community members from six villages where early probable SVD cases were identified. KIIs and FGDs focused on experiences with SVD and Viral Hemorrhagic Fever (VHF) surveillance in the district. Thematic data analysis was used for qualitative data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Forty-six (85%) of 54 health facilities surveyed were privately-owned, among which 42 (91%) did not report to DHIS2 and 39 (85%) had no health worker trained on IDSR; both metrics were 100% in the eight public facilities. Weak community-based surveillance, poor private facility engagement, low suspicion index for VHF among health workers, inability of facilities to analyze and utilize surveillance data, lack of knowledge about to whom to report, funding constraints for surveillance activities, lack of IDSR training, and lack of all-cause mortality surveillance were identified as gaps potentially contributing to delayed outbreak detection.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Both systemic and knowledge-related gaps in IDSR surveillance in SVD-affected districts contributed to the delayed detection of the 2022 Uganda SVD outbreak. Targeted interventions to address these gaps in both public and private facilities across Uganda could help avert similar situations in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39080599
doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09659-5
pii: 10.1186/s12879-024-09659-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
754Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
McGowan CR, et al. Community-based surveillance of infectious diseases: a systematic review of drivers of success. BMJ Global Health. 2022;7(8):e009934.
pubmed: 35985697
pmcid: 9396156
World Health Organization. Uganda’s Disease Surveillance System Proves to be Effective in Detecting and Follow up Ebola Contacts Suspected Cases. 2019.
Fall IS, et al. Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) strategy: current status, challenges and perspectives for the future in Africa. BMJ Global Health. 2019;4(4):e001427.
pubmed: 31354972
pmcid: 6615866
Uganda Ministry of Health. National Technical Guidelines for Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response, Third Edition. Kampala; 2021. p. iii.
Byrne E, Sæbø JI. Routine use of DHIS2 data: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1234.
pubmed: 36203141
pmcid: 9535952
Kihembo C, et al. The design and implementation of the re-vitalised integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) in Uganda, 2013–2016. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1–11.
Kinkade C, et al. Extending and strengthening routine DHIS2 surveillance systems for COVID-19 responses in Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, and Uganda. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28(Suppl 1):S42.
pubmed: 36502427
pmcid: 9745217
World Health Organization. Uganda Launches the Third Edition of the National Guidelines for Integrated Diseases Surveillance and Response. 2021.
Feldmann H, Geisbert TW. Ebola haemorrhagic fever. Lancet. 2011;377(9768):849–62.
pubmed: 21084112
pmcid: 3406178
World Health Organization. Clinical management of patients with viral haemorrhagic fever: a pocket guide for front-line health workers. Interim emergency guidance for Country adaption. World Health Organization; 2016.
Mbonye AK, et al. Ebola viral hemorrhagic disease outbreak in West Africa-lessons from Uganda. Afr Health Sci. 2014;14(3):495–501.
pubmed: 25352864
pmcid: 4209631
Baize S, et al. Emergence of Zaire Ebola virus disease in Guinea. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(15):1418–25.
pubmed: 24738640
World Health Organization. Ebola disease caused by Sudan ebolavirus – Uganda. 2023.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. History of Ebola Disease Outbreaks. 2022.
Kiggundu T. Notes from the field: outbreak of Ebola Virus Disease caused by Sudan ebolavirus—Uganda, August–October 2022. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,; 2022. p. 71.
Honeyman DA, Notaras A. Resurgence of Sudan Virus Disease (SUVD) in Uganda 2022.
Uganda Bureau of Statistics - UBOS, I., Uganda Demographic and Health Survey. 2016, UBOS and ICF; 2018: Kampala, Uganda.
Allaranga Y et al. Lessons learned during active epidemiological surveillance of Ebola and Marburg viral hemorrhagic fever epidemics in Africa. East Afr J Public Health, 2010. 7(1).
Metuge A, et al. Humanitarian led community-based surveillance: case study in Ekondo-Titi. Cameroon Confl Health. 2021;15(1):1–12.
Mbonye AK, Joseph F. Issa Makumbi, and Jane Ruth Aceng. EVD virus hemorrhagic disease outbreak in West Africa-lessons from Uganda. Afr Health Sci. 2014;14(3):495–501. Nanyunja, AlexOpio.
pubmed: 25352864
pmcid: 4209631
Lado M, et al. Clinical features of patients isolated for suspected Ebola virus disease at Connaught Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(9):1024–33.
pubmed: 26213248
Organization WH. Integrated disease surveillance in the African region: a regional strategy for communicable diseases 1999–2003, in Integrated disease surveillance in the African Region: a regional strategy for communicable diseases 1999–2003. 1999. pp. 24–24.
Konde-Lule J, et al. Private and public health care in rural areas of Uganda. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010;10:1–8.
Phalkey RK, et al. From habits of attrition to modes of inclusion: enhancing the role of private practitioners in routine disease surveillance. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:1–15.
Mboera LE et al. Malaria surveillance and use of evidence in planning and decision making in Kilosa District, Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res, 2017. 19(3).
Wu J. Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) in Malawi: implementation gaps and challenges for timely alert. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(11):e0200858.
Rumunu J et al. Evaluation of integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) and early warning and response network (EWARN) in South Sudan 2021. Pan Afr Med J, 2022. 42(6).
Africa CDC. Continental Framework on Strengthening Mortality Surveillance Systems in Africa. 2023.
Madewell ZJ, et al. Prioritising health-care strategies to reduce childhood mortality, insights from Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS): a longitudinal study. Lancet Global Health. 2022;10:S8.