Improved readability in written neurodevelopmental reports by five writing rules.
Clinical report
neuropsychological assessment
parents
readability
teachers.
Journal
Scandinavian journal of psychology
ISSN: 1467-9450
Titre abrégé: Scand J Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0404510
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Jul 2024
30 Jul 2024
Historique:
revised:
01
07
2024
received:
19
03
2024
accepted:
03
07
2024
medline:
31
7
2024
pubmed:
31
7
2024
entrez:
31
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The purpose of a neuropsychological assessment is to describe a child's difficulties and strengths to enable treatments and contextual adjustments. Typically, the assessment is summarized in the form of a written clinical report. However, such texts have been criticized for being too difficult for parents and teachers to read and comprehend. The purpose of this pre-registered and randomized controlled study was to evaluate five writing rules to improve readability and accessibility in clinical reports: to structure the text with functional domains, exemplify cognitive tasks with examples from daily life, use examples from the daily life of the child, avoid jargon, and to write shorter sentences. We created two separate reports based on the same assessment information of a hypothetical child: one "standard" report, and one where the five writing rules were applied. One hundred teacher students at a teacher education program were randomized to read one of the reports, and then rated readability and answered a comprehension quiz. Results showed that the five writing rules led to improved ratings of readability, and helped readers recall more information immediately afterward. Effects were medium to large. Future studies need to investigate whether the findings generalize to parents and other potential readers. Additionally, future work should address how psychologists can be taught to improve their writing through writing guidelines. Clinical trial registration: https://aspredicted.org/ac96p.pdf.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Scandinavian Journal of Psychology published by Scandinavian Psychological Associations and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Astle, D.E., Holmes, J., Kievit, R. & Gathercole, S.E. (2022). Annual research review: The transdiagnostic revolution in neuropsychological disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63, 397–417.
Bagnato, S.J. (1980). The efficacy of diagnostic reports as individualized guides to prescriptive goal planning. Exceptional Children, 46, 554–557.
Bartram, D. & Hambleton, R.K. (2016). The ITC guidelines: International standards and guidelines relating to tests and testing. In F.T.L. Leong, D. Bartram, F.M. Cheung, K.F. Geisinger & D. Iliescu (Eds.), The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 35–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bölte, S., Leifler, E., Berggren, S. & Borg, A. (2021). Inclusive practice for students with neurodevelopmental disorders in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, 9, 9–15.
Boulton, K.A., Hodge, M.A., Jewell, A., Ong, N., Silove, N. & Guastella, A.J. (2023). Diagnostic delay in children with neuropsychological conditions attending a publicly funded developmental assessment service: Findings from the Sydney child neurodevelopment research registry. BMJ Open, 13, e069500. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen‐2022‐069500.
Boyle, C.A., Boulet, S., Schieve, L.A., Cohen, R.A., Blumberg, S.J., Yeargin‐Allsopp, M. et al. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997–2008. Pediatrics, 127, 1034–1042.
Brenner, E. (2003). Consumer‐focused psychological assessment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 240–247.
Centrum för epidemiologi och Samhällsmedicin. (2017). Autismspektrumtillstånd och ADHD bland barn och unga i Stockholms län: Förekomst i befolkningen samt vårdsökande under åren 2011 till 2016 (Fact sheet 2017:1). Stockholm Läns Landsting.
Coughlan, B., Woolgar, M., Weisblatt, E.J. & Duschinsky, R. (2023). “Instruments are good at eliciting information; scores are very dangerous:” The perspectives of clinical professionals regarding neuropsychological assessment. Autism, 27, 905–915.
Davis, A. & Groth‐Marnat, G. (2013). Psychological report writing assistant. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Donaldson, N., McDermott, A., Hollands, K., Copley, J. & Davidson, B. (2004). Clinical reporting by occupational therapists and speech pathologists: Therapists' intentions and parental satisfaction. International Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology, 6, 23–38.
Fletcher, J., Hawkins, T. & Thornton, J. (2015). What makes an effective psychoeducational report? Perceptions of teachers and psychologists. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 25, 38–54.
Francés, L., Quintero, J., Fernández, A., Ruiz, A., Caules, J., Fillon, G. et al. (2022). Current state of knowledge on the prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood according to the DSM‐5: A systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA criteria. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 16, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034‐022‐00462‐1.
Grisso, T. (2010). Guidance for improving forensic reports: A review of common errors. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 102–115.
Groth‐Marnat, G. (2009). The five assessment issues you meet when you go to heaven. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 303–310.
Guilmette, T.J., Sweet, J.J., Hebben, N., Koltai, D., Mahone, E.M., Spiegler, B.J. et al. (2020). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology consensus conference statement on uniform labeling of performance test scores. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34, 437–453.
Harvey, V.S. (1997). Improving readability of psychological reports. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 271–274.
Harvey, V.S. (2006). Variables affecting the clarity of psychological reports. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 5–18.
International Test Commission. (2001). International guidelines for test use. International Journal of Testing, 1, 93–114.
Jablonska, B., Ohlis, A. & Dal, H. (2022). Autismspektrumtillstånd och adhd bland barn och ungdomar i Stockholms län: förekomst i befolkningen samt vårdkonsumtion. En uppföljningsrapport. Stockholm: Centrum för epidemiologi och samhällsmedicin, Region Stockholm.
Landis, J.R. & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
Leifler, E., Carpelan, G., Zakrevska, A., Bölte, S. & Jonsson, U. (2021). Does the learning environment “make the grade?” A systematic review of accommodations for children on the autism spectrum in mainstream school. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28, 582–597.
Mastoras, S.M., Climie, E.A., McCrimmon, A.W. & Schwean, V.L. (2011). A C.L.E.A.R. approach to report writing: A framework for improving the efficacy of psychoeducational reports. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 26, 127–147.
Ownby, R.L. (1990). A study of the expository process model in school psychological report. Psychology in the Schools, 27, 353–358.
Pelco, L.E., Ward, S.B., Coleman, L. & Young, J. (2009). Teacher ratings of three psychological report styles. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 19–27.
Reichenberg, M. (2013). Are “reader‐friendly” texts always better? IARTEM e‐Journal, 5(2), 64–84.
Schendel, D.E. & Thorsteinsson, E. (2018). Cumulative incidence of autism into adulthood for birth cohorts in Denmark, 1980–2012. JAMA, 320, 1811–1813.
Selander, U.B. & Nyman, H. (2017). Psykologutlåtanden och intyg. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Smedler, A.‐C. & Tideman, E. (2009). Att testa barn och ungdomar – om testmetoder i psykologiska utredningar. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
Socialstyrelsen. (2014). Stöd till barn, ungdomar och vuxna med ADHD – ett kunskapsstöd. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
Socialstyrelsen. (2022). Nationella riktlinjer för vård och stöd vid adhd och autism. Prioriteringsstöd till beslutsfattare och chefer 2022. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
Språkrådet (2014). Myndigheternas skrivregler (Åttonde upplagan). Norstedts Juridik AB.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2018). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Diagnosis and management (NICE guideline, 87). Retrieved June 27 2024, from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng87/chapter/Recommendations#diagnosis.
United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Treaty Series, 1577, 3. Retrieved June 27 2024, from https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1990/09/19900902%2003‐14%20AM/Ch_IV_11p.pdf
Vogel, F., Blanken, T., Burger, J., Reichert, J., Scholten, S. & Klintwall, L. (2024). How perceived causal networks (PECAN) can complement case conceptualization, diagnostic classification and data‐based networks: An introduction to a method for constructing personalized networks https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7wfte.PsyArXiv
Weddig, R.R. (1984). Parental interpretation of psychological reports. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 477–481.
Wiener, J. (1985). Teachers' comprehension of psychological reports. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 60–64.
Wiener, J. (1987). Factors affecting educators' comprehension of psychological reports. Psychology in the Schools, 24, 116–126.
Wiener, J. & Costaris, L. (2012). Teaching psychological report writing: Content and process. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27, 119–135.
Wiener, J. & Kohler, S. (1986). Parents' comprehension of psychological reports. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 265–270.
Wilson, P., Wood, R., Lykke, K., Hauskov Graungaard, A., Ertmann, R. K., Andersen, M. K. et al. (2018). International variation in programmes for assessment of children's neurodevelopment in the community: Understanding disparate approaches to evaluation of motor, social, emotional, behavioural and cognitive function. Scandinavian journal of public health, 46(8), 805–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494818772211