Fetomaternal Outcome of Pregnant Women at Term Undergoing Cesarean Section.


Journal

Journal of Nepal Health Research Council
ISSN: 1999-6217
Titre abrégé: J Nepal Health Res Counc
Pays: Nepal
ID NLM: 101292936

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 04 01 2023
accepted: 21 06 2024
medline: 31 7 2024
pubmed: 31 7 2024
entrez: 31 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cesarean section is one of the most common procedures performed in obstetric practice today and is a lifesaving surgery for mother and fetus. Cesarean sections are classified traditionally, as elective cesarean section or emergency cesarean. The purpose of this study is to compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes in elective and emergency cesarean section so that measures can be taken to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. A descriptive study including 400 pregnant women who underwent caesarean section were included in this study. Patients were subjected to elective or emergency cesarean section as per the indication and protocol of institute. were included in the study. During the study period there were total 1080 deliveries. The average age of the women was 29.21±4.07 years. Of the 400 cesarean section cases, only 2.8% had wound infection, 3.8% had fever, 4.8% urinary tract infection (UTI) whereas no women had observed with post-partum hemorrhages (PPH) and maternal death. Regarding fetal outcome, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission was observed in 16%, birth asphyxia was 2.3% poor Apgar score 2.5% and neonatal death was not observed. Rate of fever, UTI, wound infection, need of resuscitation and poor Apgar score was significantly high in emergency section than elective caesarean section whereas NICU admission was not statistically significant. The most common indication of emergency cesarean section were fetal dress and for previous LSCS. Emergency cesarean was associated with increased maternal and perinatal complications than in elective cesarean section.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cesarean section is one of the most common procedures performed in obstetric practice today and is a lifesaving surgery for mother and fetus. Cesarean sections are classified traditionally, as elective cesarean section or emergency cesarean. The purpose of this study is to compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes in elective and emergency cesarean section so that measures can be taken to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
METHODS METHODS
A descriptive study including 400 pregnant women who underwent caesarean section were included in this study. Patients were subjected to elective or emergency cesarean section as per the indication and protocol of institute. were included in the study.
RESULTS RESULTS
During the study period there were total 1080 deliveries. The average age of the women was 29.21±4.07 years. Of the 400 cesarean section cases, only 2.8% had wound infection, 3.8% had fever, 4.8% urinary tract infection (UTI) whereas no women had observed with post-partum hemorrhages (PPH) and maternal death. Regarding fetal outcome, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission was observed in 16%, birth asphyxia was 2.3% poor Apgar score 2.5% and neonatal death was not observed. Rate of fever, UTI, wound infection, need of resuscitation and poor Apgar score was significantly high in emergency section than elective caesarean section whereas NICU admission was not statistically significant. The most common indication of emergency cesarean section were fetal dress and for previous LSCS.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Emergency cesarean was associated with increased maternal and perinatal complications than in elective cesarean section.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39080932
doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.4599
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

21-24

Auteurs

Sonu Bharati (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kathmandu Model Hospital, Nepal.

Ganesh Dangal (G)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kathmandu Model Hospital, Nepal.

Kenusha Devi Tiwari (KD)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kathmandu Model Hospital, Nepal.

Sunita Maharjan (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kathmandu Model Hospital, Nepal.

Srijana Bhandari (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kathmandu Model Hospital, Nepal.

Aruna Karki (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kathmandu Model Hospital, Nepal.

Hema Kumari Pradhan (HK)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kathmandu Model Hospital, Nepal.

Ranjana Shrestha (R)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kathmandu Model Hospital, Nepal.

Kabin Bhattachan (K)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kathmandu Model Hospital, Nepal.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH