Differential Expression of Immunohistochemical Markers in Ameloblastoma & Ameloblastic Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of observational studies.


Journal

F1000Research
ISSN: 2046-1402
Titre abrégé: F1000Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101594320

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
accepted: 20 05 2024
medline: 31 7 2024
pubmed: 31 7 2024
entrez: 31 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Differentiating between ameloblastoma (AB) and ameloblastic carcinoma (AC) is difficult, especially when AB has atypical cytological characteristics or an uncommon clinical history. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the differential expression of immunohistochemical markers between AB and AC. We conducted a thorough search of PUBMED and SCOPUS according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify cross-sectional studies that compared the expression of immunohistochemical markers in AB and AC. We used a random-effects model to analyze the risk ratios and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The Egger's test was used to assess publication bias. In total, 301 articles were identified. After excluding irrelevant titles and abstracts, 86 articles were selected for full-text review. We categorized the 41 markers into proliferative and non-proliferative markers. Among non-proliferative markers, nuclear markers were differentially expressed in AB and AC. SOX2 was the only marker that significantly differentiated AB and AC, with an RR of -0.19 (CI 0.10-0.36, I2=0). The current evidence suggests the significance of SOX2 in differentiating between AB and AC, warranting prospective confirmation in well-defined extensive studies. We highlight the paucity of high-quality replicated studies of other markers in this field. Collaborative efforts with standardized techniques are necessary to generate clinically useful immunohistochemical markers.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Differentiating between ameloblastoma (AB) and ameloblastic carcinoma (AC) is difficult, especially when AB has atypical cytological characteristics or an uncommon clinical history. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the differential expression of immunohistochemical markers between AB and AC.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We conducted a thorough search of PUBMED and SCOPUS according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify cross-sectional studies that compared the expression of immunohistochemical markers in AB and AC. We used a random-effects model to analyze the risk ratios and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The Egger's test was used to assess publication bias.
Results UNASSIGNED
In total, 301 articles were identified. After excluding irrelevant titles and abstracts, 86 articles were selected for full-text review. We categorized the 41 markers into proliferative and non-proliferative markers. Among non-proliferative markers, nuclear markers were differentially expressed in AB and AC. SOX2 was the only marker that significantly differentiated AB and AC, with an RR of -0.19 (CI 0.10-0.36, I2=0).
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The current evidence suggests the significance of SOX2 in differentiating between AB and AC, warranting prospective confirmation in well-defined extensive studies. We highlight the paucity of high-quality replicated studies of other markers in this field. Collaborative efforts with standardized techniques are necessary to generate clinically useful immunohistochemical markers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39082057
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.149861.1
pmc: PMC11287113
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0

Banques de données

figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.25836703.v3']

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review Meta-Analysis

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

557

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Mishra S et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No competing interests were disclosed.

Auteurs

Saleena Mishra (S)

Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Swagatika Panda (S)

Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Neeta Mohanty (N)

Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Swati Mishra (S)

General Dental Practitioner, Odisha, 757001, India.

Divya Gopinath (D)

Centre of Medical and Bio-allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Basic Medical and Dental Sciences Dept, Ajman University, Ajman, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.

Saurav Panda (S)

Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Sukumaran Anil (S)

Department of Dentistry, Oral Health Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Doha, Qatar.
Qatar University, Doha, Doha, Qatar.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH