Perioperative and mid-term outcomes of mitral valve surgery with and without concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation: a retrospective analysis.
Atrial fibrillation
cardiac surgery
mitral valve
surgical ablation
Journal
Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
ISSN: 2753-670X
Titre abrégé: Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918540787006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Jul 2024
31 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
25
01
2024
revised:
09
07
2024
accepted:
30
07
2024
medline:
31
7
2024
pubmed:
31
7
2024
entrez:
31
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
We retrospectively analyzed perioperative and mid-term outcome for patients undergoing mitral valve surgery with and without atrial fibrillation. Patients who underwent mitral valve surgery between January 2018 and February 2023 were included and categorized into three groups: "No AF" (no documented atrial fibrillation), "AF no SA" (atrial fibrillation without surgical ablation), and "AF and SA" (atrial fibrillation with concomitant surgical ablation). Groups were compared for perioperative and mid-term outcomes, including mortality, stroke, bleeding and pacemaker implantation. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Of the 400 patients included, preoperative atrial fibrillation was present in 43%. Mean follow-up was 1.8 (SD: 1.1) years. The patients who underwent surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation exhibited similar overall outcomes compared to patients without preoperative atrial fibrillation. Patients with untreated atrial fibrillation showed higher mortality ("No AF": 2.2% vs "AF no SA": 8.3% vs "AF and SA": 3.2%; p-value 0.027) and increased postoperative pacemaker implantation rates ("No AF": 5.7% vs "AF no SA": 15.6% vs "AF and SA": 7.9%, p-value: 0.011). In a composite analysis of adverse events (Mortality, Bleeding, Stroke), the highest incidence was observed in patients with untreated atrial fibrillation, while patients with treated atrial fibrillation had similar outcomes as those without preoperative documented atrial fibrillation ("No AF": 9.6% vs "AF no SA": 20.2% vs "AF and SA" 3: 9.5%, p-value: 0.018). Concomitant surgical ablation should be considered in mitral valve surgery for atrial fibrillation, as it leads to similar mid-term outcomes compared to patients without preoperative documented atrial fibrillation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39083003
pii: 7724800
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae144
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.