Health-related quality of life following hysterectomy by vNOTES versus conventional laparoscopy.
Hysterectomy
laparoscopic hysterectomy
vNOTES
Journal
Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy
ISSN: 1365-2931
Titre abrégé: Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9612996
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2024
Aug 2024
Historique:
medline:
1
8
2024
pubmed:
1
8
2024
entrez:
31
7
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate safety, efficacy, pre- and postoperative outcomes of vNOTES hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic (CL) hysterectomy. This prospective study was conducted on patients who underwent CL or vNOTES hysterectomy for benign gynecological indications between January and July 2021. Sociodemographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes were evaluated using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. A total of 228 patients (CL vs. vNOTES: 147 vs. 81) were included. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of blood loss, uterine weight, complications, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate. Patients in the vNOTES group experienced significantly less postoperative pain and required less analgesia compared to those who underwent CL hysterectomy ( This research showed that vNOTES has various advantages, such as less postoperative pain, reduced analgesic usage, and better HRQoL outcomes three months after surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39084252
doi: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2323100
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM