Associations between Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy score and long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: Analysis of >27,000 patients.


Journal

The Canadian journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1916-7075
Titre abrégé: Can J Cardiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8510280

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 11 06 2023
revised: 12 06 2024
accepted: 30 06 2024
medline: 1 8 2024
pubmed: 1 8 2024
entrez: 31 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score was developed to identify patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are likely to derive benefit (score ≥2) or harm (score <2) from extended DAPT beyond 1-year post-PCI with respect to ischaemic and bleeding outcomes. We examined the associations between DAPT score at index PCI and long-term mortality from an all-comers PCI registry in patients receiving DAPT as per the standard of care. We retrospectively examined prospectively collected data from the Melbourne Interventional Group PCI database (2005- 2018) and grouped patients as having DAPT score ≥2 or <2. Long-term mortality was assessed from the Australian National Death Index linkage. The primary endpoint was long-term mortality using survival analysis. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital events and 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Of 27,740 study patients, 9,402 (33.9%) had DAPT score ≥2. Patients with DAPT score ≥2 were younger and included more females with higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with DAPT score ≥2 had higher in-hospital mortality (3.0% vs. 1.0%) and major bleeding (2.3% vs. 1.6%), 30-day MACE (7.1% vs. 3.1%), and long-term mortality at a median follow-up of 5.17 years (21.9% vs. 16.5%), p<0.001 for all. A third of all-comer patients undergoing PCI had a DAPT score ≥2 with greater short-term ischaemic and bleeding risk, and higher long-term mortality. Risk assessment using the DAPT score may guide the duration and intensity of DAPT beyond the early post-PCI period.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score was developed to identify patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are likely to derive benefit (score ≥2) or harm (score <2) from extended DAPT beyond 1-year post-PCI with respect to ischaemic and bleeding outcomes. We examined the associations between DAPT score at index PCI and long-term mortality from an all-comers PCI registry in patients receiving DAPT as per the standard of care.
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively examined prospectively collected data from the Melbourne Interventional Group PCI database (2005- 2018) and grouped patients as having DAPT score ≥2 or <2. Long-term mortality was assessed from the Australian National Death Index linkage. The primary endpoint was long-term mortality using survival analysis. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital events and 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 27,740 study patients, 9,402 (33.9%) had DAPT score ≥2. Patients with DAPT score ≥2 were younger and included more females with higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with DAPT score ≥2 had higher in-hospital mortality (3.0% vs. 1.0%) and major bleeding (2.3% vs. 1.6%), 30-day MACE (7.1% vs. 3.1%), and long-term mortality at a median follow-up of 5.17 years (21.9% vs. 16.5%), p<0.001 for all.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
A third of all-comer patients undergoing PCI had a DAPT score ≥2 with greater short-term ischaemic and bleeding risk, and higher long-term mortality. Risk assessment using the DAPT score may guide the duration and intensity of DAPT beyond the early post-PCI period.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39084254
pii: S0828-282X(24)00582-8
doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2024.06.030
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Mae Chyi Tan (MC)

Department of Cardiology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.

Diem Dinh (D)

Centre of Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Daniel Gayed (D)

Department of Cardiology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.

Danlu Liang (D)

Department of Cardiology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.

Angela Brennan (A)

Centre of Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Stephen J Duffy (SJ)

University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

David Clark (D)

University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.

Andrew Ajani (A)

Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Ernesto Oqueli (E)

Department of Cardiology, Grampians Health Ballarat, Ballarat, VIC, Australia.

Louise Roberts (L)

Department of Cardiology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

Christopher Reid (C)

University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.

Melanie Freeman (M)

Department of Cardiology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.

Jaya Chandrasekhar (J)

Department of Cardiology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: jaya.chandrasekhar@monash.edu.

Classifications MeSH