The traditional intramedullary axis underestimates the medial tibial slope compared to Transmalleolar Sagittal Axis in image-based robotic-assisted Unicompartimental Knee Arthroplasty.
Journal
The journal of knee surgery
ISSN: 1938-2480
Titre abrégé: J Knee Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101137599
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Jul 2024
31 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline:
1
8
2024
pubmed:
1
8
2024
entrez:
31
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) has been recognized as an excellent treatment for medial knee osteoarthritis. The posterior tibial slope (PTS) is measured radiographically with the intramedullary axis (IMA) to the tibial baseplate on the sagittal plane radiograph. However, in most computer-navigated or robotic mUKAs the PTS is set from a transmalleolar axis (TMA). Evaluate the PTS difference between the sagittal TMA and the sagittal IMA of patients undergoing a CT-based primary Robotic-Assisted mUKA. We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative CT scans taken according to the MAKO system protocol (Stryker) of 67 patients undergoing mUKAs. We measured the angular difference between the IM and the TMA in the sagittal plane. Using the TMA to set the PTS the estimation of the slope of the medial tibial plateau would increase by an average of 1.9° ± 3.2° compared to the IMA. Furthermore, in 9 knees, PTS was decreased. Tibial components implanted with the help of a CT scan-based pre-operative planning MAKO will show an average of 1.9 degrees more than those measured on sagittal radiographs potentially of concern for knee kinematics. A universal language is needed to standardize the slope calculation and the respective reference axis used.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) has been recognized as an excellent treatment for medial knee osteoarthritis. The posterior tibial slope (PTS) is measured radiographically with the intramedullary axis (IMA) to the tibial baseplate on the sagittal plane radiograph. However, in most computer-navigated or robotic mUKAs the PTS is set from a transmalleolar axis (TMA).
OBIECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
Evaluate the PTS difference between the sagittal TMA and the sagittal IMA of patients undergoing a CT-based primary Robotic-Assisted mUKA.
METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative CT scans taken according to the MAKO system protocol (Stryker) of 67 patients undergoing mUKAs. We measured the angular difference between the IM and the TMA in the sagittal plane.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Using the TMA to set the PTS the estimation of the slope of the medial tibial plateau would increase by an average of 1.9° ± 3.2° compared to the IMA. Furthermore, in 9 knees, PTS was decreased.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Tibial components implanted with the help of a CT scan-based pre-operative planning MAKO will show an average of 1.9 degrees more than those measured on sagittal radiographs potentially of concern for knee kinematics. A universal language is needed to standardize the slope calculation and the respective reference axis used.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.