Impact of Joint Laxity and Balance on 2-Year KOOS Outcomes of a Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.


Journal

The journal of knee surgery
ISSN: 1938-2480
Titre abrégé: J Knee Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101137599

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline: 1 8 2024
pubmed: 1 8 2024
entrez: 31 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The objective of this study was to determine relationships between intra-operative posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) sacrificing posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) laxity measurements throughout flexion and patient outcomes at 2-years post-TKA; and to define clinically relevant laxity thresholds to optimize patient outcomes. In a single surgeon study, PCL sacrificing TKA using a robotics assisted platform with a digital joint tensioning device was performed in 115 knees in 115 patients. Final intra-operative joint laxity was recorded, and 2-year Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were obtained. A Simulated Annealing optimisation algorithm was used to identify medial and lateral laxity windows which maximized the 2-year KOOS pain score. Wilcox non-parametric tests were used to compare outcomes between groups. Significant associations were found between intra-operative joint laxity and 2-year KOOS pain outcomes throughout flexion. Clinically relevant laxity windows were defined medially and laterally in mid-flexion and flexion for improved outcomes, whereas only a lateral laxity window could be defined in extension. When all laxity windows were satisfied a 14.5 KOOS point improvement was found (97.2 vs 77.8, p=0.0060) compared to knees which did not satisfy any window. Improvements in Activities of Daily Living (∆8.8, p = 0.0143), Sports (∆22.5, p = 0.0108), and Quality of Life (∆18.7, p = 0.0011) KOOS subscores were also found in knees which satisfied all windows versus 0 - 1 window. Intra-operative joint laxity is associated with post-operative outcomes in a PS knee design, wherein patients balanced within identified laxity targets reported improved outcomes over those that did not. Clinically significant thresholds were defined and were predominately found in mid-flexion and flexion for medial and lateral laxity. When target windows were combined further improved outcomes were identified.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The objective of this study was to determine relationships between intra-operative posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) sacrificing posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) laxity measurements throughout flexion and patient outcomes at 2-years post-TKA; and to define clinically relevant laxity thresholds to optimize patient outcomes.
METHODS METHODS
In a single surgeon study, PCL sacrificing TKA using a robotics assisted platform with a digital joint tensioning device was performed in 115 knees in 115 patients. Final intra-operative joint laxity was recorded, and 2-year Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were obtained. A Simulated Annealing optimisation algorithm was used to identify medial and lateral laxity windows which maximized the 2-year KOOS pain score. Wilcox non-parametric tests were used to compare outcomes between groups.
RESULTS RESULTS
Significant associations were found between intra-operative joint laxity and 2-year KOOS pain outcomes throughout flexion. Clinically relevant laxity windows were defined medially and laterally in mid-flexion and flexion for improved outcomes, whereas only a lateral laxity window could be defined in extension. When all laxity windows were satisfied a 14.5 KOOS point improvement was found (97.2 vs 77.8, p=0.0060) compared to knees which did not satisfy any window. Improvements in Activities of Daily Living (∆8.8, p = 0.0143), Sports (∆22.5, p = 0.0108), and Quality of Life (∆18.7, p = 0.0011) KOOS subscores were also found in knees which satisfied all windows versus 0 - 1 window.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Intra-operative joint laxity is associated with post-operative outcomes in a PS knee design, wherein patients balanced within identified laxity targets reported improved outcomes over those that did not. Clinically significant thresholds were defined and were predominately found in mid-flexion and flexion for medial and lateral laxity. When target windows were combined further improved outcomes were identified.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39084606
doi: 10.1055/a-2376-7085
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Thieme. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Amber L. Randall, John M. Keggi, Jan A. Koenig, Jeffrey H. DeClaire, Corey E. Ponder, Jeffrey M. Lawrence, recieved research support from Corin and are paid consultants or on the speakers bureau of Corin. Christopher Plaskos is a paid employee of Corin with Stock/Options. Edgar Wakelin was a paid employee of Corin.

Auteurs

Amber L Randall (AL)

Orthopaedic Surgery, Steward Health Care System Arizona, Phoenix, United States.

Edgar Wakelin (E)

Clinical Innovation, Corin Group USA, Raynham, United States.

James Kah (J)

Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

John M Keggi (JM)

Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedics New England, Hartford, United States.

Jan A Koenig (JA)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Hospitals, New York, United States.

Jeffrey H DeClaire (JH)

Orthopedic Surgery, Michigan Knee Institute, Rochester Hills, United States.

Corey E Ponder (CE)

Orthopedic Surgery, SSM Health St Anthony Hospital Oklahoma City, Oklahoma City, United States.

Jeffrey M Lawrence (JM)

Orthopedic Surgery, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, United States.

Christopher Plaskos (C)

Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Corin Group USA, Raynham, United States.

Classifications MeSH