Health system responsiveness to the mental health needs of Syrian refugees: mixed-methods rapid appraisals in eight host countries in Europe and the Middle East.

Europe Middle East Syrian refugees access comparative study health system responsiveness mental health quality

Journal

Open research Europe
ISSN: 2732-5121
Titre abrégé: Open Res Eur
Pays: Belgium
ID NLM: 9918230081006676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
accepted: 16 05 2024
medline: 1 8 2024
pubmed: 1 8 2024
entrez: 1 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Syrian refugees have a high burden of mental health symptoms and face challenges in accessing mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS). This study assesses health system responsiveness (HSR) to the MHPSS needs of Syrian refugees, comparing countries in Europe and the Middle East to inform recommendations for strengthening MHPSS systems. A mixed-methods rapid appraisal methodology guided by an adapted WHO Health System Framework was used to assess HSR in eight countries (Egypt, Germany, Jordan, Lebanon, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and Türkiye). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of primary and secondary data was used. Data collection and analysis were performed iteratively by multiple researchers. Country reports were used for comparative analysis and synthesis. We found numerous constraints in HSR: i) Too few appropriate mental health providers and services; ii) Travel-related barriers impeding access to services, widening rural-urban inequalities in the distribution of mental health workers; iii) Cultural, language, and knowledge-related barriers to timely care likely caused by insufficient numbers of culturally sensitive providers, costs of professional interpreters, somatic presentations of distress by Syrian refugees, limited mental health awareness, and stigma associated to mental illness; iv) High out-of-pocket costs for psychological treatment and transportation to services reducing affordability, particularly in middle-income countries; v) Long waiting times for specialist mental health services; vi) Information gaps on the mental health needs of refugees and responsiveness of MHPSS systems in all countries. Six recommendations are provided to address these issues. All eight host countries struggle to provide responsive MHPSS to Syrian refugees. Strengthening the mental health workforce (in terms of quantity, quality, diversity, and distribution) is urgently needed to enable Syrian refugees to receive culturally appropriate and timely care and improve mental health outcomes. Increased financial investment in mental health and improved health information systems are crucial. People who experience war often have increased mental health problems. Those who are forced to flee abroad frequently struggle to access adequate mental health and psychosocial support services. As a result, many refugees often do not seek or use such services.Researchers of the Syrian REfuGees MeNTal HealTH Care Systems (STRENGTHS) consortium carried out rapid appraisals to assess the responsiveness of health systems to the mental health and psychosocial needs of Syrian refugees in eight countries: Egypt, Germany, Jordan, Lebanon, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and Türkiye. They used quantitative and qualitative data, including primary and secondary data. This paper summarises and compares findings from the eight countries. The ability of a health system to meet the expectations and needs of its people with regards to access, coverage, quality, and safety of services. We found that all eight host countries struggle to provide responsive mental health and psychosocial support to Syrian refugees. We identified the following key challenges: Insufficient mental health providers and services, including uneven rural-urban distribution;Cultural, language, and knowledge-related barriers to timely care, caused by insufficient culturally sensitive providers and mental health stigma among Syrian refugee communities;Out-of-pocket costs for psychological treatment and transportation to services;Long waiting times for specialist mental health services;Information gaps on the mental health needs of Syrian refugees;We recommend increasing national funding for mental health to help Syrian refugees to receive more culturally appropriate and timely care. Increased funding can reduce out-of-pocket payments by refugees, improve national health information systems, and strengthen the mental health workforce (in terms of quantity, quality, diversity, and distribution). We also recommend investment in cultural competency and mental health training for community-based workers and primary care providers.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Syrian refugees have a high burden of mental health symptoms and face challenges in accessing mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS). This study assesses health system responsiveness (HSR) to the MHPSS needs of Syrian refugees, comparing countries in Europe and the Middle East to inform recommendations for strengthening MHPSS systems.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A mixed-methods rapid appraisal methodology guided by an adapted WHO Health System Framework was used to assess HSR in eight countries (Egypt, Germany, Jordan, Lebanon, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and Türkiye). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of primary and secondary data was used. Data collection and analysis were performed iteratively by multiple researchers. Country reports were used for comparative analysis and synthesis.
Results UNASSIGNED
We found numerous constraints in HSR: i) Too few appropriate mental health providers and services; ii) Travel-related barriers impeding access to services, widening rural-urban inequalities in the distribution of mental health workers; iii) Cultural, language, and knowledge-related barriers to timely care likely caused by insufficient numbers of culturally sensitive providers, costs of professional interpreters, somatic presentations of distress by Syrian refugees, limited mental health awareness, and stigma associated to mental illness; iv) High out-of-pocket costs for psychological treatment and transportation to services reducing affordability, particularly in middle-income countries; v) Long waiting times for specialist mental health services; vi) Information gaps on the mental health needs of refugees and responsiveness of MHPSS systems in all countries. Six recommendations are provided to address these issues.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
All eight host countries struggle to provide responsive MHPSS to Syrian refugees. Strengthening the mental health workforce (in terms of quantity, quality, diversity, and distribution) is urgently needed to enable Syrian refugees to receive culturally appropriate and timely care and improve mental health outcomes. Increased financial investment in mental health and improved health information systems are crucial.
Background UNASSIGNED
People who experience war often have increased mental health problems. Those who are forced to flee abroad frequently struggle to access adequate mental health and psychosocial support services. As a result, many refugees often do not seek or use such services.Researchers of the Syrian REfuGees MeNTal HealTH Care Systems (STRENGTHS) consortium carried out rapid appraisals to assess the responsiveness of health systems to the mental health and psychosocial needs of Syrian refugees in eight countries: Egypt, Germany, Jordan, Lebanon, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and Türkiye. They used quantitative and qualitative data, including primary and secondary data. This paper summarises and compares findings from the eight countries.
What is health system responsiveness? UNASSIGNED
The ability of a health system to meet the expectations and needs of its people with regards to access, coverage, quality, and safety of services.
What are our main findings and recommendations? UNASSIGNED
We found that all eight host countries struggle to provide responsive mental health and psychosocial support to Syrian refugees. We identified the following key challenges: Insufficient mental health providers and services, including uneven rural-urban distribution;Cultural, language, and knowledge-related barriers to timely care, caused by insufficient culturally sensitive providers and mental health stigma among Syrian refugee communities;Out-of-pocket costs for psychological treatment and transportation to services;Long waiting times for specialist mental health services;Information gaps on the mental health needs of Syrian refugees;We recommend increasing national funding for mental health to help Syrian refugees to receive more culturally appropriate and timely care. Increased funding can reduce out-of-pocket payments by refugees, improve national health information systems, and strengthen the mental health workforce (in terms of quantity, quality, diversity, and distribution). We also recommend investment in cultural competency and mental health training for community-based workers and primary care providers.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
People who experience war often have increased mental health problems. Those who are forced to flee abroad frequently struggle to access adequate mental health and psychosocial support services. As a result, many refugees often do not seek or use such services.Researchers of the Syrian REfuGees MeNTal HealTH Care Systems (STRENGTHS) consortium carried out rapid appraisals to assess the responsiveness of health systems to the mental health and psychosocial needs of Syrian refugees in eight countries: Egypt, Germany, Jordan, Lebanon, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and Türkiye. They used quantitative and qualitative data, including primary and secondary data. This paper summarises and compares findings from the eight countries.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39086733
doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15293.2
pmc: PMC11289593
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

14

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Woodward A et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No competing interests were disclosed.

Auteurs

Aniek Woodward (A)

KIT Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, 1092 AD, The Netherlands.
Athena Institute, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.

Daniela C Fuhr (DC)

Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, 28359, Germany.
Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, 28359, Germany.

Alexandra S Barry (AS)

KIT Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, 1092 AD, The Netherlands.
NHS England, London, SE1 8UG, UK.

Dina Balabanova (D)

Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Egbert Sondorp (E)

KIT Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, 1092 AD, The Netherlands.

Marjolein A Dieleman (MA)

KIT Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, 1092 AD, The Netherlands.

Pierre Pratley (P)

KIT Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, 1092 AD, The Netherlands.

Samantha F Schoenberger (SF)

Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Martin McKee (M)

Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Zeynep Ilkkursun (Z)

Department of Psychology, Koc University, Sarıyer/İstanbul, Turkey.

Ceren Acarturk (C)

Department of Psychology, Koc University, Sarıyer/İstanbul, Turkey.

Sebastian Burchert (S)

Department of Education and Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, 14195, Germany.

Christine Knaevelsrud (C)

Department of Education and Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, 14195, Germany.

Felicity L Brown (FL)

Research and Development Department, War Child Holland, Amsterdam, 1098 LE, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1018 WV, The Netherlands.

Frederik Steen (F)

Research and Development Department, War Child Holland, Amsterdam, 1098 LE, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1018 WV, The Netherlands.

Julia Spaaij (J)

Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.

Naser Morina (N)

Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.

Anne M de Graaff (AM)

Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.

Marit Sijbrandij (M)

Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.

Pim Cuijpers (P)

Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
Babeș-Bolyai University, International Institute for Psychotherapy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Richard Bryant (R)

School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

Aemal Akhtar (A)

School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

Bayard Roberts (B)

Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Classifications MeSH