Diagnostic Accuracy of an Integrated AI Tool to Estimate Gestational Age From Blind Ultrasound Sweeps.


Journal

JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 1 8 2024
pubmed: 1 8 2024
entrez: 1 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Accurate assessment of gestational age (GA) is essential to good pregnancy care but often requires ultrasonography, which may not be available in low-resource settings. This study developed a deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) model to estimate GA from blind ultrasonography sweeps and incorporated it into the software of a low-cost, battery-powered device. To evaluate GA estimation accuracy of an AI-enabled ultrasonography tool when used by novice users with no prior training in sonography. This prospective diagnostic accuracy study enrolled 400 individuals with viable, single, nonanomalous, first-trimester pregnancies in Lusaka, Zambia, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Credentialed sonographers established the "ground truth" GA via transvaginal crown-rump length measurement. At random follow-up visits throughout gestation, including a primary evaluation window from 14 0/7 weeks' to 27 6/7 weeks' gestation, novice users obtained blind sweeps of the maternal abdomen using the AI-enabled device (index test) and credentialed sonographers performed fetal biometry with a high-specification machine (study standard). The primary outcome was the mean absolute error (MAE) of the index test and study standard, which was calculated by comparing each method's estimate to the previously established GA and considered equivalent if the difference fell within a prespecified margin of ±2 days. In the primary evaluation window, the AI-enabled device met criteria for equivalence to the study standard, with an MAE (SE) of 3.2 (0.1) days vs 3.0 (0.1) days (difference, 0.2 days [95% CI, -0.1 to 0.5]). Additionally, the percentage of assessments within 7 days of the ground truth GA was comparable (90.7% for the index test vs 92.5% for the study standard). Performance was consistent in prespecified subgroups, including the Zambia and North Carolina cohorts and those with high body mass index. Between 14 and 27 weeks' gestation, novice users with no prior training in ultrasonography estimated GA as accurately with the low-cost, point-of-care AI tool as credentialed sonographers performing standard biometry on high-specification machines. These findings have immediate implications for obstetrical care in low-resource settings, advancing the World Health Organization goal of ultrasonography estimation of GA for all pregnant people. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05433519.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39088200
pii: 2821666
doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.10770
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05433519']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Jeffrey S A Stringer (JSA)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Teeranan Pokaprakarn (T)

Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill.

Juan C Prieto (JC)

Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Bellington Vwalika (B)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.

Srihari V Chari (SV)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Ntazana Sindano (N)

UNC Global Project-Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Bethany L Freeman (BL)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Bridget Sikapande (B)

UNC Global Project-Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Nicole M Davis (NM)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Yuri V Sebastião (YV)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Nelly M Mandona (NM)

UNC Global Project-Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Elizabeth M Stringer (EM)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Chiraz Benabdelkader (C)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Mutinta Mungole (M)

UNC Global Project-Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Filson M Kapilya (FM)

UNC Global Project-Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Nariman Almnini (N)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Arieska N Diaz (AN)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Brittany A Fecteau (BA)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Michael R Kosorok (MR)

Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill.

Stephen R Cole (SR)

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill.

Margaret P Kasaro (MP)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.

Classifications MeSH