Health care resource utilization and costs for treatment-experienced people with HIV switching or restarting antiretroviral regimens since 2018.
Humans
HIV Infections
/ drug therapy
Retrospective Studies
Female
Male
Adult
Middle Aged
Pyridones
/ economics
Anti-HIV Agents
/ economics
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
/ economics
Tenofovir
/ therapeutic use
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Health Care Costs
/ statistics & numerical data
Drug Combinations
Oxazines
/ therapeutic use
Emtricitabine
/ therapeutic use
Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings
/ therapeutic use
Piperazines
/ economics
Lamivudine
/ economics
HIV Integrase Inhibitors
/ economics
Health Resources
/ economics
Drug Substitution
/ economics
Amides
Cyclopropanes
Dideoxyadenosine
/ analogs & derivatives
Journal
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
ISSN: 2376-1032
Titre abrégé: J Manag Care Spec Pharm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101644425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2024
Aug 2024
Historique:
medline:
1
8
2024
pubmed:
1
8
2024
entrez:
1
8
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is a need to understand health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with treatment-experienced people with HIV (PWH) switching treatment regimens. To describe HCRU and cost during lines of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for treatment-experienced PWH switching to or restarting guideline-recommended, integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based multitablet regimens and single-tablet regimens. This retrospective claims study used data from Optum Research Database (January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2020) to identify lines of therapy (LOTs) for treatment-experienced adults who switched to or restarted INSTI-based regimens between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. The first LOT during the study period was included in the analysis. We examined all-cause HCRU and costs and HIV-related HCRU and combined costs to the health plan and direct patient costs by site of service and compared between INSTI-based regimens: bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) (single tablet) vs dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (DTG/ABC/3TC) (single tablet), dolutegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (DTG+FTC/TAF) (multitablet), and dolutegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DTG+FTC/TDF) (multitablet). Analysis of HCRU by site of service was conducted following inverse probability treatment weighting. Multivariable regression was conducted using a generalized linear model with stepwise covariate selection to estimate HIV-related medical costs and control for remaining differences after inverse probability treatment weighting. 4,251 PWH were identified: B/F/TAF (n = 2,727; 64.2%), DTG/ABC/3TC (n = 898; 21.1%), DTG+FTC/TAF (n = 539; 12.7%), and DTG+FTC/TDF (n = 87; 2.1%). PWH treated with DTG+FTC/TAF had a significantly higher mean of all-cause ambulatory visits than PWH treated with B/F/TAF (1.8 vs 1.6, HIV-related medical costs during the LOT were lowest for PWH treated with INSTI-based single-tablet regimens. Simplifying treatment regimens may help PWH maintain lower health care costs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
UNASSIGNED
There is a need to understand health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with treatment-experienced people with HIV (PWH) switching treatment regimens.
OBJECTIVE
UNASSIGNED
To describe HCRU and cost during lines of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for treatment-experienced PWH switching to or restarting guideline-recommended, integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based multitablet regimens and single-tablet regimens.
METHODS
UNASSIGNED
This retrospective claims study used data from Optum Research Database (January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2020) to identify lines of therapy (LOTs) for treatment-experienced adults who switched to or restarted INSTI-based regimens between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. The first LOT during the study period was included in the analysis. We examined all-cause HCRU and costs and HIV-related HCRU and combined costs to the health plan and direct patient costs by site of service and compared between INSTI-based regimens: bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) (single tablet) vs dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (DTG/ABC/3TC) (single tablet), dolutegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (DTG+FTC/TAF) (multitablet), and dolutegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DTG+FTC/TDF) (multitablet). Analysis of HCRU by site of service was conducted following inverse probability treatment weighting. Multivariable regression was conducted using a generalized linear model with stepwise covariate selection to estimate HIV-related medical costs and control for remaining differences after inverse probability treatment weighting.
RESULTS
UNASSIGNED
4,251 PWH were identified: B/F/TAF (n = 2,727; 64.2%), DTG/ABC/3TC (n = 898; 21.1%), DTG+FTC/TAF (n = 539; 12.7%), and DTG+FTC/TDF (n = 87; 2.1%). PWH treated with DTG+FTC/TAF had a significantly higher mean of all-cause ambulatory visits than PWH treated with B/F/TAF (1.8 vs 1.6,
CONCLUSIONS
UNASSIGNED
HIV-related medical costs during the LOT were lowest for PWH treated with INSTI-based single-tablet regimens. Simplifying treatment regimens may help PWH maintain lower health care costs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39088337
doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.8.817
doi:
Substances chimiques
Pyridones
0
Anti-HIV Agents
0
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
0
Tenofovir
99YXE507IL
Drug Combinations
0
Oxazines
0
Emtricitabine
G70B4ETF4S
dolutegravir
DKO1W9H7M1
Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings
0
abacavir, lamivudine drug combination
0
bictegravir
8GB79LOJ07
Piperazines
0
Lamivudine
2T8Q726O95
HIV Integrase Inhibitors
0
Amides
0
Cyclopropanes
0
Dideoxyadenosine
4Q86AH641A
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM