Sub-concussive head impacts from heading footballs do not acutely alter brain excitability as compared to a control group.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 21 08 2023
accepted: 18 06 2024
medline: 1 8 2024
pubmed: 1 8 2024
entrez: 1 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Repeated sub-concussive head impacts are a growing brain health concern, but their possible biomarkers remain elusive. One impediment is the lack of a randomised controlled human experimental model to study their effects on the human brain. This work had two objectives. The first one was to provide a randomised controlled human experimental model to study the acute effects of head impacts on brain functions. To achieve this, this work's second objective was to investigate if head impacts from heading footballs acutely alter brain excitability by increasing corticospinal inhibition as compared to a control group. In practised and unpractised young healthy adults, transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess corticospinal silent period (CSP) duration and corticospinal excitability (CSE) before and immediately after performing headings by returning 20 hand-thrown balls directed to the head (Headings; n = 30) or the dominant foot (Control; n = 30). Moreover, the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ) was used to assess the symptoms of head impacts. Head acceleration was also assessed in subgroups of participants. The intervention lengthened CSP duration in both the Headings (6.4 ± 7.5%) and Control groups (4.6 ± 2.6%), with no difference in lengthening between the two groups. Moreover, CSE was not altered by the intervention and did not differ between groups. However, performing headings increased headaches and dizziness symptoms and resulted in greater head acceleration upon each football throw (12.5 ± 1.9g) as compared to the control intervention (5.5 ± 1.3g). The results suggest that head impacts from football headings do not acutely alter brain excitability as compared to a control intervention. However, the results also suggest that the present protocol can be used as an experimental model to investigate the acute effects of head impacts on the human brain.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Repeated sub-concussive head impacts are a growing brain health concern, but their possible biomarkers remain elusive. One impediment is the lack of a randomised controlled human experimental model to study their effects on the human brain.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
This work had two objectives. The first one was to provide a randomised controlled human experimental model to study the acute effects of head impacts on brain functions. To achieve this, this work's second objective was to investigate if head impacts from heading footballs acutely alter brain excitability by increasing corticospinal inhibition as compared to a control group.
METHODS METHODS
In practised and unpractised young healthy adults, transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess corticospinal silent period (CSP) duration and corticospinal excitability (CSE) before and immediately after performing headings by returning 20 hand-thrown balls directed to the head (Headings; n = 30) or the dominant foot (Control; n = 30). Moreover, the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ) was used to assess the symptoms of head impacts. Head acceleration was also assessed in subgroups of participants.
RESULTS RESULTS
The intervention lengthened CSP duration in both the Headings (6.4 ± 7.5%) and Control groups (4.6 ± 2.6%), with no difference in lengthening between the two groups. Moreover, CSE was not altered by the intervention and did not differ between groups. However, performing headings increased headaches and dizziness symptoms and resulted in greater head acceleration upon each football throw (12.5 ± 1.9g) as compared to the control intervention (5.5 ± 1.3g).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The results suggest that head impacts from football headings do not acutely alter brain excitability as compared to a control intervention. However, the results also suggest that the present protocol can be used as an experimental model to investigate the acute effects of head impacts on the human brain.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39088385
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306560
pii: PONE-D-23-24520
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0306560

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Hamel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Raphael Hamel (R)

School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Baptiste Maxime Waltzing (BM)

Institute of Neurosciences, UC Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium.

Tom Massey (T)

School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

James Blenkinsop (J)

School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Leah McConnell (L)

School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Kieran Osborne (K)

School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Karamo Sesay (K)

School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Finn Stoneman (F)

School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Adam Carter (A)

School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Hajar Maaroufi (H)

School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Ned Jenkinson (N)

School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH