How green is my reusable bronchoscope?
Bronchoscopy
Life cycle assessment
critical care
global warming
Journal
Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine
ISSN: 2352-5568
Titre abrégé: Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101652401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Jul 2024
30 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
09
03
2024
revised:
22
06
2024
accepted:
05
07
2024
medline:
2
8
2024
pubmed:
2
8
2024
entrez:
1
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Single-use bronchoscopes have replaced reusable ones in many institutions. This study aimed to evaluate the environmental and financial impacts of both strategies: reusable and single-use bronchoscopes. We conducted a pragmatic study in a 21-bed polyvalent ICU, in Saint-Brieuc, Bretagne, France. The eco-audit consisted of estimating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, considering the life cycle of each strategy. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions related to construction, packaging, transport and waste elimination were compared between 2 devices: the reusable bronchoscope, a Pentax® FI-16RBS that was disinfected twice daily; and the single-use bronchoscope, the bronchoflex agile® from TSC. For the reusable bronchoscope, GHG emissions were marginally impacted by the number of bronchoscopies performed (from 185 kg eq.CO Considering current practice in our ICU, reusable bronchoscopes have lower GHG emissions when used more than 50 times a year and a lower cost when used more than 96 times a year as compared with single-use bronchoscopes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39089450
pii: S2352-5568(24)00078-X
doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101420
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101420Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.