ECTOPIC trial: The efficacy of flEcainide Compared To metOprolol in reducing Premature ventrIcular contractions. A randomized open label cross-over study in pediatric patients.
Premature ventricular contractions
anti-arrhythmic drugs
children
cross-over
flecainide
metoprolol
randomized
reduction
Journal
Heart rhythm
ISSN: 1556-3871
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101200317
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Jul 2024
30 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
07
06
2024
revised:
15
07
2024
accepted:
26
07
2024
medline:
2
8
2024
pubmed:
2
8
2024
entrez:
1
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in children are usually considered benign. Symptoms and/or left ventricular dysfunction are indications for treatment with anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD). To evaluate the efficacy of flecainide versus metoprolol in reducing PVCs in children. A randomized open label cross-over trial children with a PVC-burden of >15% on Holter; successively treated with metoprolol and flecainide or vice versa, with a drug free interval of at least two weeks. Holter measurements were repeated before and after the start of the AAD. Sixty patients were screened, 19 patients could be included. Median age was 13.9 years (IQR 5.5 years). Mean baseline PVC-burden was 21.7% (N=18, SD±14.0) before the start of flecainide and 21.2% (N=17, SD±11.5) before the start of metoprolol. In a mixed model analysis the estimated mean reduction in PVC-burden was 10.6 percentage-points (95%-CI 5.8-15.3) for flecainide and 2.4 percentage-points (95%-CI -2.7-7.5) for metoprolol, with a significant difference of 8.2 percentage-points (95%-CI of 0.86-15.46, P=0.031). Exploratory analysis revealed that 9/18 patients treated with flecainide and 1/17 patients treated with metoprolol, had a reduction to a PVC-burden below 5%. No discriminating factors between flecainide-responders and non-responders were found; the mean plasma level was not significantly different (0.34 mg/L versus 0.52 mg/L, P=0.277). In children with frequent PVCs flecainide led to a significant greater reduction of PVC-burden, compared to metoprolol. Flecainide was effective in only a subgroup of patients, which appears to be unrelated to the plasma level. (Dutch Trial Register number 26689).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in children are usually considered benign. Symptoms and/or left ventricular dysfunction are indications for treatment with anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD).
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy of flecainide versus metoprolol in reducing PVCs in children.
METHODS
METHODS
A randomized open label cross-over trial children with a PVC-burden of >15% on Holter; successively treated with metoprolol and flecainide or vice versa, with a drug free interval of at least two weeks. Holter measurements were repeated before and after the start of the AAD.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Sixty patients were screened, 19 patients could be included. Median age was 13.9 years (IQR 5.5 years). Mean baseline PVC-burden was 21.7% (N=18, SD±14.0) before the start of flecainide and 21.2% (N=17, SD±11.5) before the start of metoprolol. In a mixed model analysis the estimated mean reduction in PVC-burden was 10.6 percentage-points (95%-CI 5.8-15.3) for flecainide and 2.4 percentage-points (95%-CI -2.7-7.5) for metoprolol, with a significant difference of 8.2 percentage-points (95%-CI of 0.86-15.46, P=0.031). Exploratory analysis revealed that 9/18 patients treated with flecainide and 1/17 patients treated with metoprolol, had a reduction to a PVC-burden below 5%. No discriminating factors between flecainide-responders and non-responders were found; the mean plasma level was not significantly different (0.34 mg/L versus 0.52 mg/L, P=0.277).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In children with frequent PVCs flecainide led to a significant greater reduction of PVC-burden, compared to metoprolol. Flecainide was effective in only a subgroup of patients, which appears to be unrelated to the plasma level. (Dutch Trial Register number 26689).
Identifiants
pubmed: 39089565
pii: S1547-5271(24)03090-X
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.07.111
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.