Analysis of gout remission definitions in a randomised controlled trial of colchicine prophylaxis for people with gout initiating allopurinol.


Journal

The Journal of rheumatology
ISSN: 1499-2752
Titre abrégé: J Rheumatol
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 7501984

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 2 8 2024
pubmed: 2 8 2024
entrez: 1 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To investigate the effect of colchicine prophylaxis on gout remission when commencing urate lowering therapy (ULT), and illness perceptions of people in remission, using two definitions of gout remission. Data from a 12-month double-blind placebo-controlled trial of 200 people with gout commencing allopurinol were analyzed. Participants were randomly assigned to prophylaxis with 0.5mg daily colchicine or placebo for six months, followed by six months of additional follow-up. Gout remission was assessed using the 2016 preliminary definition or simplified definition without patient reported outcomes. Illness perceptions were assessed using a gout-specific brief illness perception questionnaire (BIPQ). In the first six months, few participants were in remission according to either the 2016 preliminary definition (3% for colchicine and 4% for placebo) or the simplified definition (7% for colchicine and 12% for placebo). In the second six months, after study drug (colchicine or placebo) discontinuation, fewer participants in the colchicine group than in the placebo group were in remission according to the 2016 preliminary definition (4% vs. 14%, p=0.03), and the simplified definition (14% vs 28%, p=0.02). Participants fulfilling remission using either definition had more favorable perceptions about their gout symptoms and illness concerns, as well as consequences, when using the simplified definition. Using either definition, six months of colchicine prophylaxis when initiating ULT does not provide an advantage in the fulfilment of gout remission. People fulfilling either definition report fewer symptoms, lower concern about their gout, and when using the simplified definition, are less affected by gout.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39089837
pii: jrheum.2024-0400
doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0400
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Adwoa Dansoa Tabi-Amponsah (AD)

A.D. Tabi-Amponsah, BBiomedSc(Hons). Department of Medicine, The Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Lisa K Stamp (LK)

L.K. Stamp, PhD, FRACP. Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Anne Horne (A)

A. Horne, MBChB, Department of Medicine, The Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Jill Drake (J)

J. Drake, RN. Department of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Sarah Stewart (S)

S. Stewart, PhD. Department of Medicine, The Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland; School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Greg Gamble (G)

G. Gamble, MSc, Department of Medicine, The Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Keith J Petrie (KJ)

K.J. Petrie, PhD. Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland.

Nicola Dalbeth (N)

N. Dalbeth, MD, FRACP, Department of Medicine, The Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Classifications MeSH