Atorvastatin lowers breast cancer risk by reversing an early tumorigenic signature.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 31 01 2024
accepted: 15 07 2024
medline: 2 8 2024
pubmed: 2 8 2024
entrez: 1 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Breast cancer remains a significant health challenge with complex molecular mechanisms. While many studies have explored genetic markers in breast carcinogenesis, few have studied the potential impact of pharmacological interventions such as Atorvastatin on its genetic landscape. This study aimed to elucidate the molecular distinctions between normal and tumor-adjacent tissues in breast cancer and to investigate the potential protective role of atorvastatin, primarily known for its lipid-lowering effects, against breast cancer. Searching the Gene Expression Omnibus database identified two datasets, GSE9574 and GSE20437, comparing normal breast tissues with tumor-adjacent samples, which were merged, and one dataset, GSE63427, comparing paired pre- and post-treated patients with atorvastatin. Post-ComBat application showed merged datasets' consistency, revealing 116 DEGs between normal and tumor-adjacent tissues. Although initial GSE63427 data analysis suggested a minimal impact of atorvastatin, 105 DEGs post-treatment were discovered. Thirteen genes emerged as key players, both affected by Atorvastatin and dysregulated in tumor-adjacent tissues. Pathway analysis spotlighted the significance of these genes in processes like inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and cell cycle control. Moreover, there was a noticeable interaction between these genes and the immunological microenvironment in tumor-adjacent tissues, with Atorvastatin potentially altering the suppressive immune landscape to favor anti-tumor immunity. Survival analysis further highlighted the prognostic potential of the 13-gene panel, with 12 genes associated with improved survival outcomes. The 13-gene signature offers promising insights into breast cancer's molecular mechanisms and atorvastatin's potential therapeutic role. The preliminary findings advocate for an in-depth exploration of atorvastatin's impact on.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39090164
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67706-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-67706-2
doi:

Substances chimiques

Atorvastatin A0JWA85V8F

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

17803

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Fuchs, H. E. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 72, 7–33 (2022).
pubmed: 35020204 doi: 10.3322/caac.21708
la Mare, J.-A. et al. Breast cancer: Current developments in molecular approaches to diagnosis and treatment. Recent Patents Anticancer Drug Discov. 9, 153–175 (2014).
doi: 10.2174/15748928113086660046
Waks, A. G. & Winer, E. P. Breast cancer treatment: A review. JAMA 321, 288–300 (2019).
pubmed: 30667505 doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19323
Pondé, N. F., Zardavas, D. & Piccart, M. Progress in adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 16, 27–44 (2019).
pubmed: 30206303 doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0089-9
Ma, L. Determinants of breast cancer progression. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 243fs25 (2014).
pubmed: 24990878 pmcid: 4157363 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009587
Wu, Q. et al. Cancer-associated adipocytes: Key players in breast cancer progression. J. Hematol. Oncol. 12, 1–15 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0778-6
Bao, X., Anastasov, N., Wang, Y. & Rosemann, M. A novel epigenetic signature for overall survival prediction in patients with breast cancer. J. Transl. Med. 17, 1–12 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-2126-6
Fouad, Y. A. & Aanei, C. Revisiting the hallmarks of cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 7, 1016 (2017).
pubmed: 28560055 pmcid: 5446472
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011).
pubmed: 21376230 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
Aran, D. et al. Comprehensive analysis of normal adjacent to tumor transcriptomes. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–14 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01027-z
Graham, K. et al. Gene expression in histologically normal epithelium from breast cancer patients and from cancer-free prophylactic mastectomy patients shares a similar profile. Br. J. Cancer 102, 1284–1293 (2010).
pubmed: 20197764 pmcid: 2855998 doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605576
Kang, T. et al. A risk-associated Active transcriptome phenotype expressed by histologically normal human breast tissue and linked to a pro-tumorigenic adipocyte population. Breast Cancer Res. 22, 1–15 (2020).
doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01322-6
Román-Pérez, E. et al. Gene expression in extratumoral microenvironment predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res. 14, 1–12 (2012).
doi: 10.1186/bcr3152
Tripathi, A. et al. Gene expression abnormalities in histologically normal breast epithelium of breast cancer patients. Int. J. Cancer 122, 1557–1566 (2008).
pubmed: 18058819 doi: 10.1002/ijc.23267
Koudijs, K. K. M., Böhringer, S. & Guchelaar, H. J. Validation of transcriptome signature reversion for drug repurposing in oncology. Brief Bioinform. 24, bbac490 (2023).
pubmed: 36445193 doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac490
Borges, R. de P., Degobi, N. A. H. & Bertoluci, M. C. Choosing statins: A review to guide clinical practice. Arch. Endocrinol. Metab. 64, 639 (2020).
Torrandell-Haro, G. et al. Statin therapy and risk of Alzheimer’s and age-related neurodegenerative diseases. Alzheimer’s Dement. Transl. Res. Clin. Interv. 6, 149 (2020).
Yan, J. et al. Effect of statins on Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 98, e14852 (2019).
pubmed: 30896628 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014852
Zhou, Q., Jiao, Z., Liu, Y., Devreotes, P. N. & Zhang, Z. The effects of statins in patients with advanced-stage cancers—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Oncol. 13, 1234713 (2023).
pubmed: 37664034 pmcid: 10473877 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1234713
Ahmadi, M. et al. Pleiotropic effects of statins: A focus on cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 1866, 1–17 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165968
Borgquist, S., Bjarnadottir, O., Kimbung, S. & Ahern, T. P. Statins: A role in breast cancer therapy?. J. Intern. Med. 284, 346 (2018).
pubmed: 29923256 pmcid: 6175478 doi: 10.1111/joim.12806
Kumar, A. S. et al. Estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer is less likely to arise among lipophilic statin users. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 17, 1028–1033 (2008).
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0726
Desai, P. et al. Statins and breast cancer stage and mortality in the Women’s Health Initiative. Cancer Causes Control 26, 529–539 (2015).
pubmed: 25736184 pmcid: 5056588 doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0530-7
Sun, L. et al. Associations of genetically proxied inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase, NPC1L1, and PCSK9 with breast cancer and prostate cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 24, 1–10 (2022).
doi: 10.1186/s13058-022-01508-0
Kochhar, R., Khurana, V., Bejjanki, H., Caldito, G. & Fort, C. Statins to reduce breast cancer risk: A case control study in US female veterans. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 514–514. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.23.16_suppl.514 (2005).
doi: 10.1200/jco.2005.23.16_suppl.514
Anothaisintawee, T. et al. Effect of lipophilic and hydrophilic statins on breast cancer risk in Thai women: A cross-sectional study. J. Cancer 7, 1163–1168 (2016).
pubmed: 27326260 pmcid: 4911884 doi: 10.7150/jca.14941
Wu, Q. J. et al. Statin use and breast cancer survival and risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 6, 42988 (2015).
pubmed: 26472026 pmcid: 4767486 doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5557
Kim, S. et al. PubChem in 2021: New data content and improved web interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D1388–D1395 (2021).
pubmed: 33151290 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa971
Sean, D. & Meltzer, P. S. GEOquery: A bridge between the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and BioConductor. Bioinformatics 23, 1846–1847 (2007).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm254
Leek, J. T., Johnson, W. E., Parker, H. S., Jaffe, A. E. & Storey, J. D. The SVA package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics 28, 882 (2012).
pubmed: 22257669 pmcid: 3307112 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts034
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
pubmed: 25605792 pmcid: 4402510 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007
Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2023: Protein–protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D638–D646 (2023).
pubmed: 36370105 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1000
Tang, Z., Kang, B., Li, C., Chen, T. & Zhang, Z. GEPIA2: An enhanced web server for large-scale expression profiling and interactive analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W556–W560 (2019).
pubmed: 31114875 pmcid: 6602440 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz430
Lonsdale, J. et al. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat. Genet. 45, 580–585 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/ng.2653
Weinstein, J. N. et al. The cancer genome atlas pan-cancer analysis project. Nat. Genet. 45, 1113 (2013).
pubmed: 24071849 pmcid: 3919969 doi: 10.1038/ng.2764
Xie, Z. et al. Gene set knowledge discovery with enrichr. Curr. Protoc. 1, e90 (2021).
pubmed: 33780170 pmcid: 8152575 doi: 10.1002/cpz1.90
Liberzon, A. et al. The molecular signatures database hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 1, 417–425 (2015).
pubmed: 26771021 pmcid: 4707969 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004
Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M. & Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D587–D592 (2023).
pubmed: 36300620 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac963
Carbon, S. et al. The Gene Ontology Resource: 20 years and still GOing strong. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D330–D338 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1055
Lachmann, A., Xie, Z. & Ma’ayan, A. blitzGSEA: Efficient computation of gene set enrichment analysis through gamma distribution approximation. Bioinformatics 38, 2356–2357 (2022).
pubmed: 35143610 pmcid: 9004650 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac076
Newman, A. M. et al. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat. Methods 12, 453–457 (2015).
pubmed: 25822800 pmcid: 4739640 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3337
Chen, B., Khodadoust, M. S., Liu, C. L., Newman, A. M. & Alizadeh, A. A. Profiling tumor infiltrating immune cells with CIBERSORT. Methods Mol. Biol. 1711, 243 (2018).
pubmed: 29344893 pmcid: 5895181 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7493-1_12
Gao, J. et al. Integrative Analysis of Complex Cancer Genomics and Clinical Profiles Using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal. 6, pl1 (2013).
pubmed: 23550210 pmcid: 4160307 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004088
Chandrashekar, D. S. et al. UALCAN: An update to the integrated cancer data analysis platform. Neoplasia 25, 18–27 (2022).
pubmed: 35078134 pmcid: 8788199 doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2022.01.001
Jézéquel, P. et al. Bc-GenExMiner: An easy-to-use online platform for gene prognostic analyses in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 131, 765–775 (2012).
pubmed: 21452023 doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1457-7
Da Motta, L. L. et al. The BET inhibitor JQ1 selectively impairs tumour response to hypoxia and downregulates CA9 and angiogenesis in triple negative breast cancer. Oncogene 36, 122–132 (2016).
pubmed: 27292261 pmcid: 5061082 doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.184
Parikh, N. et al. Effects of TP53 mutational status on gene expression patterns across 10 human cancer types. J. Pathol. 232, 522–533 (2014).
pubmed: 24374933 pmcid: 4362779 doi: 10.1002/path.4321
Kleivi, K. et al. TP53 mutations are associated with a particular pattern of genomic imbalances in breast carcinomas. J. Pathol. 207, 14–19 (2005).
pubmed: 16007576 doi: 10.1002/path.1812
Bertoli, C., Skotheim, J. M. & De Bruin, R. A. M. Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 518–528 (2013).
pubmed: 23877564 pmcid: 4569015 doi: 10.1038/nrm3629
Nieto, M. A., Huang, R. Y. Y. J., Jackson, R. A. A. & Thiery, J. P. P. EMT: 2016. Cell 166, 21–45 (2016).
pubmed: 27368099 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.028
Hynes, R. O. The extracellular matrix: Not just pretty fibrils. Science (80-.) 326, 1216–1219 (2009).
doi: 10.1126/science.1176009
Gazzerro, P. et al. Pharmacological actions of statins: A critical appraisal in the management of cancer. Pharmacol. Rev. 64, 102–146 (2012).
pubmed: 22106090 doi: 10.1124/pr.111.004994

Auteurs

Mohamed Y Foda (MY)

Biochemistry Division, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.

Mohamed L Salem (ML)

Immunology and Biotechnology Unit, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, and Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

Fadhl M AlAkwaa (FM)

Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Omali Y El-Khawaga (OY)

Biochemistry Division, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt. elkhawaga70s@mans.edu.eg.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH