Aqua Breast Augmentation (ABA): Hydrodissection Breast Augmentation Technique.

Breast augmentation Cosmetic surgery Hydrodissection Plastic surgery

Journal

Aesthetic plastic surgery
ISSN: 1432-5241
Titre abrégé: Aesthetic Plast Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7701756

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 28 04 2024
accepted: 15 07 2024
medline: 2 8 2024
pubmed: 2 8 2024
entrez: 1 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Breast augmentation is a prevalent procedure in plastic surgery. In this article we present the Aqua Breast Technique (ABA), an approach aimed at enhancing patient satisfaction and reducing downtime. This technique leverages tumescent anesthesia and a small incision in the inframammary fold, avoiding electrocautery and surgical drains, to fulfill the growing demand for painless procedures with minimal recovery periods. The study retrospectively analyzed 238 patients who underwent breast augmentation using the ABA technique at Instituto Rubi between 2021 and 2024. The ABA protocol involves detailed preoperative design, local anesthesia, a precise 3-centimeter incision, careful dissection, and specific postoperative care, emphasizing hydrodissection for tissue separation and the use of smooth round silicone implants through a Keller funnel. The application of the ABA technique to 238 patients, with a mean follow-up time 14 months. Ten patients required surgical intervention due to complications. Hematoma and infection rates were 0.42%, while capsulectomies were required in 2.1% of cases. Aqua Breast Augmentation technique has been successfully applied as a hydrodissection-based breast augmentation technique method, with low complication rates, short downtime, and reduced postoperative pain. Level V, therapeutic study. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Identifiants

pubmed: 39090309
doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04270-0
pii: 10.1007/s00266-024-04270-0
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

Références

American Society of Plastic Surgeons (n.d.) Plastic surgery statistics. Available from https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics . Cited 2023 Nov 31
Rusciani A, Pietramaggiori G, Troccola A, Santoprete S, Rotondo A, Curinga G (2016) The outcome of primary subglandular breast augmentation using tumescent local anesthesia. Ann Plast Surg 76(1):13–17
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000215 pubmed: 26670133
Ditlev M, Loentoft E, Hölmich LR (2023) Breast augmentation under local anesthesia with intercostal blocks and light sedation. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 57(1–6):271–278
doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2022.2069789 pubmed: 35510744
Shimizu Y, Nagasao T, Taneda H, Sakamoto Y, Asou T, Imanishi N et al (2014) Combined usage of intercostal nerve block and tumescent anaesthesia: an effective anaesthesia technique for breast augmentation. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 48(1):51–55
doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.800529 pubmed: 24325759
Bolletta A, Dessy LA, Fiorot L, Tronci A, Rusciani A, Ciudad P et al (2019) Sub-muscular breast augmentation using tumescent local anesthesia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43(1):7–13
doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1181-3 pubmed: 29995233
Ceccarino R, Di Micco R, Cappelletti R (2019) Aesthetic breast surgery under cold tumescent anesthesia: feasibility and safety in outpatient clinic. Ann Plast Surg 83(4):384–387
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001798 pubmed: 31524728
Hammond DC (2019) Discussion: submuscular breast augmentation using tumescent local anesthesia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43(1):14–15
doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1275-y pubmed: 30535554
Scomacao I, Cummins A, Roan E, Duraes EFR, Djohan R (2020) The use of surgical site drains in breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS 73(4):651–662
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.11.019
Ngan PG, Iqbal HJ, Jayagopal S, Sillitoe AT, Dhital SK, Juma A (2009) When to use drains in breast reduction surgery? Ann Plast Surg 63(2):135–137
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181893809 pubmed: 19574892
Khan SM, Smeulders MJC, Van der Horst CM (2015) Wound drainage after plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015(10):CD007258
pubmed: 26487173 pmcid: 8627700
Montemurro P, Gupta T (2023) It is time to resolve the dilemma and move away from using drains in primary breast augmentation. Aesthetic Surg J Open Forum 5:ojad048
doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad048 pubmed: 37457442
Hurtado-López LM, López-Romero S, Rizzo-Fuentes C, Zaldívar-Ramírez FR, Cervantes-Sánchez C (2001) Selective use of drains in thyroid surgery. Head Neck 23(3):189–193
doi: 10.1002/1097-0347(200103)23:3<189::AID-HED1017>3.0.CO;2-Y pubmed: 11428448
Torresetti M, Zavalloni Y, Peltristo B, Di Benedetto G (2022) A shakespearean dilemma in breast augmentation: to use drains or not? A systematic review: drains in breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 46(4):1553–1566
doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02693-7 pubmed: 35048149
Bletsis PP, Bouwer LR, Ultee KH, Cromheecke M, van der Lei B (2018) Evaluation of anatomical and round breast implant aesthetics and preferences in Dutch young lay and plastic surgeon cohort. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS 71(8):1116–1122
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.010 pubmed: 29709430
Cheng F, Cen Y, Liu C, Liu R, Pan C, Dai S (2019) Round versus anatomical implants in primary cosmetic breast augmentation: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(3):711–721
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005371 pubmed: 30601325
Liu Y, Zhang X, Luan J (2023) Breast morphological comparison between anatomic and round implant augmentation: a prospective study. Ann Plast Surg 90(1):19–26
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003353 pubmed: 36534096
Hidalgo DA, Weinstein AL (2017) Intraoperative comparison of anatomical versus round implants in breast augmentation: a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(3):587–596
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003114 pubmed: 28234826
Montemurro P, Mallucci P, Nava MB, Hedén P, Adams WP, Wagner JM (2023) Evaluation of different breast implant shapes in the same patient: is there really a difference between round and anatomical implants? Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 11(9):e5294
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005294 pubmed: 37753330 pmcid: 10519491
Hedén P, Montemurro P, Adams WP, Germann G, Scheflan M, Maxwell GP (2015) Anatomical and round breast implants: how to select and indications for use. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(2):263–272
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001474 pubmed: 26218376
Rohrich RJ, Cho MJ (2018) The role of tranexamic acid in plastic surgery: review and technical considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg 141(2):507–515
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003926 pubmed: 28938364
Om A, Marxen T, Kebede S, Losken A (2023) The usage of intravenous tranexamic acid in reduction mammaplasty safely reduces hematoma rates. Ann Plast Surg 90((6S Suppl 4)):S371-374
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003296 pubmed: 36729851
Laikhter E, Comer CD, Shiah E, Manstein SM, Bain PA, Lin SJ (2022) A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the impact of tranexamic acid administration in aesthetic plastic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 42(5):548–558
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab333 pubmed: 34486647
Valencia LC, Pérez GF, Kaplan J, Fernández-Riera R (2019) Buccal fat pad excision: hydrodissection technique. Aesthet Surg J 39(10):1037–1045
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz040 pubmed: 30768121
Singhal D, Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, Qureshi A, Tobias AM, Lee BT (2013) Intramuscular perforator dissection with the hydrodissection technique. J Reconstr Microsurg 29(1):45–49
doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326738 pubmed: 23037920
Schrier VJMM, Brault JS, Amadio PC (2020) Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection with corticosteroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a pilot study. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med 39(9):1759–1768
Bille C, Dalaei F, Thomsen JB (2019) Identifying the dissection plane for mastectomy-description and visualization of our technique. Gland Surg 8(Suppl 4):S276–S280
doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.05.04 pubmed: 31709167 pmcid: 6819889
Stein MJ, Applebaum SA, Harrast JJ, Lipa JE, Matarasso A, Gosain AK (2023) clinical practice patterns and evidence-based medicine in primary augmentation mammoplasty: a 16-year review of continuous certification tracer data from the american board of plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 152(6):1011e–1021e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010497 pubmed: 37014959
Bellaire CP, Sayegh F, Janssen P, Rutland JW, Salzberg CA (2021) Major complications after textured versus non-textured breast implants in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: a propensity score analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 45(5):2077–2085
doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02377-2 pubmed: 34100107
Salgarello M, Visconti G (2017) Staying out of double-bubble and bottoming-out deformities in dual-plane breast augmentation: anatomical and clinical study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(5):999–1006
doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-0918-8 pubmed: 28656352
Shen Z, Chen X, Sun J, Chiu C, Yu Y, Lin X et al (2019) A comparative assessment of three planes of implant placement in breast augmentation: a Bayesian analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS. 72(12):1986–1995
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.09.010
Brown T (2020) a comprehensive outcome review of subfascial breast augmentation over a 10-year period. Plast Reconstr Surg 146(6):1249–1257
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007333 pubmed: 33234953
Wiener TC (2008) Relationship of incision choice to capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32(2):303–306
doi: 10.1007/s00266-007-9061-2 pubmed: 17994260

Auteurs

Carlos Rubi (C)

Plastic Surgeon at Instituto Rubi, Cami dels Reis, 308, 07010, Palma, Spain.

Nitzan Kenig (N)

Plastic Surgeon at Instituto Rubi, Cami dels Reis, 308, 07010, Palma, Spain. nitzan.kenig@gmail.com.

Dajie Zhou (D)

Plastic Surgeon at Instituto Rubi, Cami dels Reis, 308, 07010, Palma, Spain.

Classifications MeSH