Evolution of continuing medical education in radiology: on-site vs remote.

Continuing medical education Continuing professional development Electronic learning materials Live educational events Radiology

Journal

Insights into imaging
ISSN: 1869-4101
Titre abrégé: Insights Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101532453

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 23 03 2024
accepted: 17 06 2024
medline: 2 8 2024
pubmed: 2 8 2024
entrez: 1 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To assess the evolution of continuing medical education/continuous professional development (CME/CPD) in European Radiology with a particular focus on on-site (live educational events, LEE) vs remote (electronic learning materials, ELM) participation and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results related to CME/CPD of surveys conducted by the Accreditation Council of Imaging (ACI) between 2017 and 2020 are summarized. Additional insights from the survey conducted in spring 2023, exploring online education trends since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, are presented. Finally, the results of the surveys are correlated with the total number of CME/CPD applications received annually from 2018 to 2022. Pre-pandemic, 90% of European radiologists supported mandatory CME and unified CME/CPD-system. A trend among younger radiologists towards ELM was observed. Only 20% of employers fully endorsed CME/CPD. In 2020, LEE attendance dropped significantly (95.5-33%), with a simultaneous surge (33-58%) in time spent on ELM. Post-pandemic, the majority (52%) of LEE attendees participated in 1-5 events, whereas the majority (38%) of attendees of live-streamed events participated in 6-20 meetings. Content remains a priority of respondents in all formats: 79% for online, 75% for on-site, and 74% for on-demand. While the assessed quality of LEE remained at the same level (no change (36%) or good/very good (48%)), a considerably higher percentage of respondents noticed the quality of live-streamed events was good/very good (83%). The majority of European radiologists support mandatory CME and a unified CME/CPD system. Despite the post-pandemic resurgence in LEE, ELM and hybrid events are predicted to gain further prominence. The CME/CPD system dynamically adapts to evolving professional, technical, and environmental circumstances, with human interaction gaining heightened significance post-COVID-19. Professionals expressed a desire to return to on-site participation, highlighting its desirability for social interaction. Electronic learning materials are poised for continued growth, particularly among younger generations. Professionals expressed a desire towards a unified CME/CPD system in Europe.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39090378
doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01764-y
pii: 10.1186/s13244-024-01764-y
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

192

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

ACI surveys. https://www.myebr.org/about-aci . Accessed 14 Oct 2023
Lucic M. ACI surveys on accreditation systems in Europe. https://www.myebr.org/app/uploads/Report_ACI-Survey_Europeanaccreditation-systems_2017.pdf . Accessed 16 Oct 2023
Lucic M (2018) The Future of CME/CPD 2018. https://www.myebr.org/app/uploads/ACI-Survey-The-Future-of-CME-CPD-2018.pdf . Accessed 16 Oct 2023
Loewe C, Lucic M (2019) Webinars as CME tools. https://www.myebr.org/app/uploads/Report_Webinars-as-CME-tool.pdf . Accessed 16 Oct 2023
Loewe C (2020) The impact of COVID-19 on your educational activities 2020. https://www.myebr.org/app/uploads/Report_ACI-Survey-The-impact-of-Covid-19-on-your-educational-activities.pdf . Accessed 16 Oct 2023
NIHRMRC Is my study research? Decision Tool. http://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/research/ . Accessed 11 Feb 2023
Gartner, Inc. (1995) Gartner hype cycle. https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/gartner-hype-cycle . Accessed 5 Jan 2024
Schulte TL, Gröning T, Ramsauer B et al (2021) Impact of COVID-19 on continuing medical education-results of an online survey among users of a non-profit multi-specialty live online education platform. Front Med 8:773–806
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.773806
Lucey CR, Davis JA, Green MM (2022) We have no choice but to transform: the future of medical education after the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Med 97:S71–S81
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004526 pubmed: 34789658 pmcid: 8855762
Kim KJ (2022) Moving forward: embracing challenges as opportunities to improve medical education in the post-COVID era. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 9:419
doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01451-7 pubmed: 36466707 pmcid: 9702690

Auteurs

M Adriaensen (M)

Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

P Ricci (P)

Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

H Prosch (H)

Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image‑Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

M Rupreht (M)

Radiology Department, UMC Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia. mitja.rupreht@guest.arnes.si.
Medical Faculty, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia. mitja.rupreht@guest.arnes.si.

Classifications MeSH