Endovascular treatment of aneurysm remnants with the Contour Neurovascular System after previous treatment.

Feasibility aneurysm occlusion endovascular intracranial aneurysm wide-necked

Journal

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences
ISSN: 2385-2011
Titre abrégé: Interv Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9602695

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 2 8 2024
pubmed: 2 8 2024
entrez: 2 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The Contour Neurovascular System (CNS) is a novel intrasaccular flow disrupting device with a semi-3D cup-like shape for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. This study investigates the potential and limitations of the CNS for embolization of aneurysm remnants after previous treatment. Ten cases of aneurysm recurrence treatment with the CNS were analyzed from a single-center database. Technical success, procedural aspects, complications, and angiographic results were evaluated. The aneurysms (median width: 5.3 mm, median neck width: 3.8 mm) were located in the anterior communicating artery (4), basilar tip (3), internal carotid artery (1), middle cerebral artery (1), and superior cerebellar artery (1). The aneurysms were initially treated endovascularly (9) and by clipping (1). Retreatment failed in one case where the smallest available CNS proved to be too small and had to be removed. Adjunctive coiling was performed in two large remnants of partially thrombosed basilar tip aneurysms. There were no procedural complications or morbidity. At a median follow-up of nine months, 4/8 (50%) aneurysms were completely occluded, 2/8 (25%) had neck remnants, and 2/8 (25%) had aneurysm remnants. The two aneurysm remnants were retreated with coiling and stent-assisted coiling, respectively. CNS treatment of aneurysm remnants may be feasible, especially for shallow, wide-necked aneurysm geometries. Further studies are needed to identify aneurysm subsets that benefit from CNS retreatment and to define mid- and long-term occlusion rates.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39091055
doi: 10.1177/15910199241264871
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

15910199241264871

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: CK serves as consultant for Acandis GmbH (Pforzheim, Germany) and as proctor for MicroVention Inc./Sequent Medical (Aliso Viejo, CA, USA). TL serves or previously served as proctor for MicroVention Inc./Sequent Medical (Aliso Viejo, CA, USA), CERUS Endovascular (Fremont, CA, USA), Phenox (Bochum, Germany), Stryker (Kalamazoo, MI, USA), and Medtronic (Dublin, Ireland). The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Auteurs

Lukas Goertz (L)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Alexandra Radomi (A)

Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.

Robert Forbrig (R)

Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.

Muriel Pflaeging (M)

Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.

Christoph Kabbasch (C)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Thomas Liebig (T)

Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.

Classifications MeSH