The role of hypervigilance in chronic esophageal diseases: a scoping review.

Psychogastroenterology behavioral medicine esophageal disorders health-related quality of life (HRQOL)

Journal

Translational gastroenterology and hepatology
ISSN: 2415-1289
Titre abrégé: Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101683450

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 16 12 2023
accepted: 22 04 2024
medline: 2 8 2024
pubmed: 2 8 2024
entrez: 2 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Hypervigilance has emerged as an important construct in esophageal symptom reporting, but a review of the literature does not currently exist. This scoping review aimed to generate a comprehensive overview of the literature on hypervigilance in esophageal diseases and summarize the evidence for each esophageal disease. Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology, articles that were peer-reviewed original studies, published in English, and included adult patients with at least one esophageal disease were included. Articles were retrieved from PubMed and Embase databases and screened first by title and abstract for an initial round of exclusions, and then again by full text for a second round of exclusions. Nineteen studies were included. Studies were categorized by primary diagnosis: achalasia (1, 5%), eosinophilic esophagitis (1, 5%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (6, 32%), laryngopharyngeal reflux (3, 16%), non-cardiac chest pain (3, 16%), and multi-disorder samples (5, 26%). Studies primarily evaluated associations between hypervigilance and symptom severity, psychosocial functioning, health-related quality of life, and physiological disease variables. A number of studies also evaluated hypervigilance across esophageal diseases or presentations (e.g., across motility disorders, across GERD phenotypes). The role of hypervigilance in symptom reporting has been investigated in multiple esophageal conditions. Findings suggest potential clinical utility in assessing hypervigilance, such as for disease conceptualization and treatment planning. Future research is needed in larger samples, with consistent measures of hypervigilance, and using data synthesis methodology (i.e., systematic reviews) to better compare and contrast findings across studies.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Hypervigilance has emerged as an important construct in esophageal symptom reporting, but a review of the literature does not currently exist. This scoping review aimed to generate a comprehensive overview of the literature on hypervigilance in esophageal diseases and summarize the evidence for each esophageal disease.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology, articles that were peer-reviewed original studies, published in English, and included adult patients with at least one esophageal disease were included. Articles were retrieved from PubMed and Embase databases and screened first by title and abstract for an initial round of exclusions, and then again by full text for a second round of exclusions.
Results UNASSIGNED
Nineteen studies were included. Studies were categorized by primary diagnosis: achalasia (1, 5%), eosinophilic esophagitis (1, 5%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (6, 32%), laryngopharyngeal reflux (3, 16%), non-cardiac chest pain (3, 16%), and multi-disorder samples (5, 26%). Studies primarily evaluated associations between hypervigilance and symptom severity, psychosocial functioning, health-related quality of life, and physiological disease variables. A number of studies also evaluated hypervigilance across esophageal diseases or presentations (e.g., across motility disorders, across GERD phenotypes).
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
The role of hypervigilance in symptom reporting has been investigated in multiple esophageal conditions. Findings suggest potential clinical utility in assessing hypervigilance, such as for disease conceptualization and treatment planning. Future research is needed in larger samples, with consistent measures of hypervigilance, and using data synthesis methodology (i.e., systematic reviews) to better compare and contrast findings across studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39091656
doi: 10.21037/tgh-23-120
pii: tgh-09-23-120
pmc: PMC11292104
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

44

Informations de copyright

2024 Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tgh.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tgh-23-120/coif). The series “Social and Emotional Impacts of Chronic Digestive Diseases” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. L.G. reports that she is a postdoctoral research fellow of the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO, 12A7822N) and she reports royalties for commercial use of the EHAS and United European Gastroenterology Week Travel Grant. R.Y. reports research grant from Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, consulting fees from Medtronic, MedstatLink, Phathom pharmaceuticals and Braintree Pharmaceuticals and she is on the Advisory board of RJS Mediagnostix, outside the submitted work. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Livia Guadagnoli (L)

Laboratory for Brain-Gut Axis Studies (LaBGAS), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Rena Yadlapati (R)

Center for Esophageal Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH