Interdisciplinary Delphi study by PROSEC North America: Recommendations on single indirect restorations made from ceramic and nonmetallic biomaterials for posterior teeth.
Delphi technique
crowns
dental materials
inlays
onlays
permanent restoration
Journal
Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]
ISSN: 1708-8240
Titre abrégé: J Esthet Restor Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101096515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Aug 2024
02 Aug 2024
Historique:
revised:
05
07
2024
received:
22
03
2024
accepted:
18
07
2024
medline:
2
8
2024
pubmed:
2
8
2024
entrez:
2
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This article puts forward consensus recommendations from PROSEC North America regarding single indirect restorations made from ceramic and nonmetallic biomaterials in posterior teeth. The consensus process involved a multidisciplinary panel and three consensus workshops. A systematic literature review was conducted across five databases to gather evidence. The recommendations, informed by findings from systematic reviews and formulated based on a two-phase e-Delphi survey, emphasize a comprehensive treatment strategy that includes noninvasive measures alongside restorative interventions for managing dental caries and tooth wear. The recommendations advocate for selecting between direct and indirect restorations on a case-by-case basis, favoring inlays and onlays over crowns to align with minimally invasive dentistry principles. The recommendations highlight the critical role of selecting restorative biomaterials based on clinical performance, esthetic properties, and adherence to manufacturer guidelines. They emphasize the importance of precision in restorative procedures, including tooth preparation, impression taking, contamination control, and luting. Regular follow-up and maintenance tailored to individual patient needs are crucial for the longevity of ceramic and nonmetallic restorations. These PROSEC recommendations provide a framework for dental practitioners to deliver high-quality restorative care, advocating for personalized treatment planning and minimally invasive approaches to optimize oral health outcomes. The PROSEC North America recommendations highlight the importance of minimally invasive techniques in posterior tooth restorations using ceramic and non-metallic biomaterials. These principles prioritize tooth structure conservation and personalized treatment planning, essential for enhancing clinical outcomes and long-term oral health.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Wen PYF, Chen MX, Zhong YJ, Dong QQ, Wong HM. Global burden and inequality of dental caries, 1990 to 2019. J Dent Res. 2022;101(4):392‐399.
Schwendicke F, Splieth C, Breschi L, et al. When to intervene in the caries process? An expert Delphi consensus statement. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(10):3691‐3703.
Schwendicke F, Splieth CH, Bottenberg P, et al. How to intervene in the caries process in adults: proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD‐ORCA‐DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(9):3315‐3321.
Moores CJ, Kelly SAM, Moynihan PJ. Systematic review of the effect on caries of sugars intake: ten‐year update. J Dent Res. 2022;101(9):1034‐1045.
Kumar S, Tadakamadla J, Johnson NW. Effect of toothbrushing frequency on incidence and increment of dental caries: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Dent Res. 2016;95(11):1230‐1236.
Carvalho TS, Colon P, Ganss C, et al. Consensus report of the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry: erosive tooth wear—diagnosis and management. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(7):1557‐1561.
Zhang S, Xu Y, Ma Y, Zhao W, Jin X, Fu B. The treatment outcomes of cracked teeth: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Dent. 2024;142:104843.
Duncan HF. Present status and future directions‐vital pulp treatment and pulp preservation strategies. Int Endod J. 2022;55(Suppl 3):497‐511.
Wang M, Hong Y, Hou X, Pu Y. Biting and thermal sensitivity relief of cracked tooth restored by occlusal veneer: a 12‐to 24 months prospective clinical study. J Dent. 2023;138:104694.
Edelhoff D, Erdelt K‐J, Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A. Pressable lithium disilicate ceramic versus CAD/CAM resin composite restorations in patients with moderate to severe tooth wear: clinical observations up to 13 years. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(1):116‐128.
Eggmann F, Ayub JM, Conejo J, Blatz MB. Deep margin elevation—Present status and future directions. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(1):26‐47.
Opdam N, Frankenberger R, Magne P. From ‘direct versus indirect’ toward an integrated restorative concept in the posterior dentition. Oper Dent. 2016;41(S7):S27‐S34.
Mannocci F, Bitter K, Sauro S, Ferrari P, Austin R, Bhuva B. Present status and future directions: the restoration of root filled teeth. Int Endod J. 2022;55(Suppl 4):1059‐1084.
Van den Breemer CRG, Cune MS, Özcan M, Naves LZ, Kerdijk W, Gresnigt MMM. Randomized clinical trial on the survival of lithium disilicate posterior partial restorations bonded using immediate or delayed dentin sealing after 3 years of function. J Dent. 2019;85:1‐10.
Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Glatthöfer C, Krämer N. Clinical performance and SEM marginal quality of extended posterior resin composite restorations after 12 years. Dent Mater. 2020;36(7):e217‐e228.
McGrath CE, Bonsor SJ. Survival of direct resin composite onlays and indirect tooth‐coloured adhesive onlays in posterior teeth: a systematic review. Br Dent J. 2022. doi:10.1038/s41415‐022‐4395‐3
Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Montagner AF, et al. Longevity of composite restorations is definitely not only about materials. Dent Mater. 2023;39(1):1‐12.
Ma KS‐K, Wang L‐T, Blatz MB. Efficacy of adhesive strategies for restorative dentistry: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of double‐blind randomized controlled trials over 12 months of follow‐up. J Prosthodont Res. 2023;67(1):35‐44.
Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays. Dent Mater. 2009;25(8):960‐968.
Gözetici‐Çil B, Öztürk‐Bozkurt F, Genç‐Çalışkan G, Yılmaz B, Aksaka N, Özcan M. Clinical performance of posterior indirect resin composite restorations with the proximal box elevation technique: a prospective clinical trial up to 3 years. J Adhes Dent. 2024;26(1):19‐30.
Farouk AT, Hassanein OES, Fahmy OI, Elkady AM, ElNahass H. Biological evaluation of indirect restorations in endodontically treated posterior teeth with deeply located proximal margins following deep margin elevation versus surgical crown lengthening: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;28(1):24.
Mario D, Mario A, Allegra C, et al. The influence of indirect bonded restorations on clinical prognosis of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Dent Mater. 2022;38(8):e203‐e219.
Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22(3):241‐249.
Politano G, van Meerbeek B, Peumans M. Nonretentive bonded ceramic partial crowns: concept and simplified protocol for long‐lasting dental restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(6):495‐510.
Spitznagel FA, Prott LS, Hoppe JS, et al. Minimally invasive CAD/CAM lithium disilicate partial‐coverage restorations show superior in‐vitro fatigue performance than single crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36(1):94‐106.
Vianna ALS d V, Prado CJ, Bicalho AA, da Silva Pereira RA, das Neves FD, Soares CJ. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20180004.
Spitznagel FA, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC. CAD/CAM ceramic restorative materials for natural teeth. J Dent Res. 2018;97(10):1082‐1091.
Belli R, Petschelt A, Hofner B, Hajtó J, Scherrer SS, Lohbauer U. Fracture rates and lifetime estimations of CAD/CAM all‐ceramic restorations. J Dent Res. 2016;95(1):67‐73.
Burian G, Erdelt K, Schweiger J, Keul C, Edelhoff D, Güth JF. In‐vivo‐wear in composite and ceramic full mouth rehabilitations over 3 years. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):14056.
Curran P, Cattani‐Lorente M, Anselm Wiskott HW, Durual S, Scherrer SS. Grinding damage assessment for CAD‐CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2017;33(3):294‐308.
Morimoto S, Rebello de Sampaio FBW, Braga MM, Sesma N, Özcan M. Survival rate of resin and ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Dent Res. 2016;95(9):985‐994.
Nadanovsky P, Pires Dos Santos AP, Nunan D. Too much dentistry. JAMA Intern Med. 2024;184(7):713‐714.
Jünger S, Payne SA, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearley SG. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med. 2017;31(8):684‐706.
Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations—criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater. 2013;29(1):28‐50.
Wilson N, Lynch CD, Brunton PA, et al. Criteria for the replacement of restorations: academy of operative dentistry European section. Oper Dent. 2016;41(S7):S48‐S57.
Hickel R, Mesinger S, Opdam N, et al. Revised FDI criteria for evaluating direct and indirect dental restorations‐recommendations for its clinical use, interpretation, and reporting. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(6):2573‐2592.
Bresser RA, Hofsteenge JW, Wieringa TH, et al. Clinical longevity of intracoronal restorations made of gold, lithium disilicate, leucite, and indirect resin composite: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(9):4877‐4896.
Lopes‐Fatturi A, Wambier L, Rolim TZC, Reis A, de Souza JF. Restorative techniques for permanent first molars affected by hypomineralization: a systematic review. Pediatr Dent. 2022;44(1):17‐24.
Fathy H, Hamama HH, El‐Wassefy N, Mahmoud SH. Clinical performance of resin‐matrix ceramic partial coverage restorations: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(5):3807‐3822.
Ferrari M, Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Pontoriero DIK, Ercoli C, Chochlidakis K. Survival rates of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with all‐ceramic partial‐coverage crowns: when systematic review fails. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):1971.
Hardan L, Mancino D, Bourgi R, et al. Treatment of tooth wear using direct or indirect restorations: a systematic review of clinical studies. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022;9(8):346.
Leitão CIMB, de Oliveira Fernandes GV, Azevedo LPP, Araújo FM, Donato H, Correia ARM. Clinical performance of monolithic CAD/CAM tooth‐supported zirconia restorations: systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2022;66(3):374‐384.
Tennert C, Suárez Machado L, Jaeggi T, Meyer‐Lueckel H, Wierichs RJ. Posterior ceramic versus metal restorations: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Dent Mater. 2022;38(10):1623‐1632.
Aziz A, el‐Mowafy O, Paredes S. Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate glass‐ceramic crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology: a systematic review. Dent Med Probl. 2020;57(2):197‐206.
Al‐Dabbagh RA. Survival and success of endocrowns: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(3):415.e1‐415.e9.
Dioguardi M, Alovisi M, Troiano G, et al. Clinical outcome of bonded partial indirect posterior restorations on vital and non‐vital teeth: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(12):6597‐6621.
Zou Y, Bai J, Xiang JZ. Survival rate of ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth with one‐surface or multi‐surface after a 10‐year follow‐up: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2021;78(5):549‐555.
Al‐Haj Husain N, Özcan M, Molinero‐Mourelle P, Joda T. Clinical performance of partial and full‐coverage fixed dental restorations fabricated from hybrid polymer and ceramic CAD/CAM materials: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(7):2107.
Biagioni A, Pecciarini M, Discepoli N, Ferrari M. The role of occlusion on full mouth rehabilitation by adhesive partial crowns. A systematic review. J Osseointegration. 2020;12(2):161‐166.
Govare N, Contrepois M. Endocrowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(3):411‐418.e9.
Komine F, Honda J, Kusaba K, Kubochi K, Takata H, Fujisawa M. Clinical outcomes of single crown restorations fabricated with resin‐based CAD/CAM materials. J Oral Sci. 2020;62(4):353‐355.
Papia E, Habib W, Larsson C. The influence of different designs, materials and cements on the success and survival rate of endocrowns. A systematic review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2020;28(3):100‐111.
Solá‐Ruíz MF, Baima‐Moscardó A, Selva‐Otaolaurruchi E, et al. Wear in antagonist teeth produced by monolithic zirconia crowns: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4):997.
Thomas RM, Kelly A, Tagiyeva N, Kanagasingam S. Comparing endocrown restorations on permanent molars and premolars: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Br Dent J. 2020. doi:10.1038/s41415‐020‐2279‐y
Vetromilla BM, Opdam NJ, Leida FL, et al. Treatment options for large posterior restorations: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020;151(8):614‐624.e18.
Gou M, Chen H, Kang J, Wang H. Antagonist enamel wear of tooth‐supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns in vivo: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(4):598‐603.
Rodrigues SB, Franken P, Celeste RK, Leitune VCB, Collares FM. CAD/CAM or conventional ceramic materials restorations longevity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2019;63(4):389‐395.
Sampaio FBWR, Özcan M, Gimenez TC, Moreira MSNA, Tedesco TK, Morimoto S. Effects of manufacturing methods on the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite restorations: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(6):561‐571.
Abduo J, Sambrook RJ. Longevity of ceramic onlays: a systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(3):193‐215.
Alves de Carvalho IF, Santos Marques TM, Araújo FM, Azevedo LF, Donato H, Correia A. Clinical performance of CAD/CAM tooth‐supported ceramic restorations: a systematic review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018;38(4):e68‐e78.
Angeletaki F, Gkogkos A, Papazoglou E, Kloukos D. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth. A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Dent. 2016;53:12‐21.
Da Veiga AMA, Cunha AC, Ferreira DMTP, et al. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Dent. 2016;54:1‐12.
Kassardjian V, Varma S, Andiappan M, Creugers NHJ, Bartlett D. A systematic review and meta analysis of the longevity of anterior and posterior all‐ceramic crowns. J Dent. 2016;55:1‐6.
Sedrez‐Porto JA, da Rosa WLDO, Da Silva AF, Münchow EA, Pereira‐Cenci T. Endocrown restorations: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Dent. 2016;52:8‐14.
Tsirogiannis P, Reissmann DR, Heydecke G. Evaluation of the marginal fit of single‐unit, complete‐coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(3):328‐335.e2.
Mangani F, Marini S, Barabanti N, Preti A, Cerutti A. The success of indirect restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Stomatol. 2015;64(5):231‐240.
Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All‐ceramic or metal‐ceramic tooth‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015;31(6):603‐623.
Sequeira‐Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, Nasser M, Alrowaili EF, Cochrane Oral Health Group. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root‐filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(9):CD009109.
Van den Breemer CRG, Gresnigt MMM, Cune MS. Cementation of glass‐ceramic posterior restorations: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:148954.
Grivas E, Roudsari RV, Satterthwaite JD. Composite inlays: a systematic review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2014;22(3):117‐124.
Pieger S, Salman A, Bidra AS. Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(1):22‐30.
Fron Chabouis H, Smail Faugeron V, Attal J‐P. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2013;29(12):1209‐1218.
Hmaidouch R, Weigl P. Tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region: a systematic literature review. Int J Oral Sci. 2013;5(4):183‐190.
Takeichi T, Katsoulis J, Blatz MB. Clinical outcome of single porcelain‐fused‐to‐zirconium dioxide crowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110(6):455‐461.
Wang X, Fan D, Swain MV, Zhao K. A systematic review of all‐ceramic crowns: clinical fracture rates in relation to restored tooth type. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25(5):441‐450.
Pol CWP, Kalk W. A systematic review of ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: an update. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24(6):566‐575.
Wittneben J‐G, Wright RF, Weber H‐P, Gallucci GO. A systematic review of the clinical performance of CAD/CAM single‐tooth restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22(5):466‐471.
Heintze SD, Rousson V. Fracture rates of IPS Empress all‐ceramic crowns‐a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(2):129‐133.
Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CHF. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all‐ceramic and metal‐ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:73‐85.
Kaiser M, Wasserman A, Strub JR. Long‐term clinical results of VITA In‐Ceram Classic: a systematic review. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2006;116(2):120‐128.
Wassermann A, Kaiser M, Strub JR. Clinical long‐term results of VITA In‐Ceram Classic crowns and fixed partial dentures: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19(4):355‐363.
Hayashi M, Wilson NHF, Yeung CA, Worthington HV. Systematic review of ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7(1):8‐19.
Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 1999;15(1):54‐61.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
Miao C, Yang X, Wong MC, et al. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;5(5):CD009858.
Falacho RI, Melo EA, Marques JA, Ramos JC, Guerra F, Blatz MB. Clinical in‐situ evaluation of the effect of rubber dam isolation on bond strength to enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(1):48‐55.
Bagher SM, Sabbagh HJ. A literature review of clinical efficiency, patient satisfaction, and future preference of Isolite and DryShield dental isolation systems among pediatric patients. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023;47(4):1‐8.
Ozer F, Batu Eken Z, Hao J, Tuloglu N, Blatz M. Effect of immediate dentin sealing on the bonding performance of indirect restorations: a systematic review. Biomimetics (Basel). 2024;9(3):182.
Josic U, Sebold M, Lins RBE, et al. Does immediate dentin sealing influence postoperative sensitivity in teeth restored with indirect restorations? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(1):55‐64.
Souza Melo G d, Batistella EÂ, Bertazzo‐Silveira E, et al. Association of sleep bruxism with ceramic restoration failure: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(3):354‐362.
Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):719‐725.
Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7(15):10.