Neural correlates of distress and comfort in individuals with avoidant, anxious and secure attachment style: an fMRI study.

Attachment style comfort distress emotional brain processes fMRI reward system

Journal

Attachment & human development
ISSN: 1469-2988
Titre abrégé: Attach Hum Dev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100901315

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 2 8 2024
pubmed: 2 8 2024
entrez: 2 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Despite a growing literature, experiments directly related to attachment are still needed. We explored brain processes involved in two aspects of attachment, distress and comfort. Seventy-eight healthy adult males with different attachment styles (secure, avoidant, and anxious) viewed distress, comfort, complicity-joy and neutral images (picture database BAPS-Adult) in an fMRI block design. ROIs from the modules described in the functional Neuro-Anatomical Model of Attachment (Long et al. 2020) were studied. Secure participants used more co- and self-regulation strategies and exhibited a higher activation of the reward network in distress and comfort viewing, than insecure participants. Avoidant participants showed the lower brain activations. Their approach and reward modules were the least activated in distress and comfort. Anxious participants presented both higher activations of the approach and aversion modules during complicity-joy. In addition, comfort and complicity-joy were processed differently according to attachment styles and should be differentiated among positive stimuli to disentangle attachment processes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39093338
doi: 10.1080/14616734.2024.2384393
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-23

Auteurs

Alexandre Comte (A)

Université de Franche-Comté, INSERM, UMR 1322 LINC, Besançon, France.
Université de Franche-Comté, INSERM, UMR 1322 LINC, Plateforme Neuraxess, CIC-1431 INSERM, Besançon, France.

Monika Szymanska (M)

Université de Franche-Comté, INSERM, UMR 1322 LINC, Besançon, France.
Université de Franche-Comté, CHU Besançon, Service de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Besançon, France.

Julie Monnin (J)

Université de Franche-Comté, INSERM, UMR 1322 LINC, Besançon, France.
Université de Franche-Comté, CHU Besançon, Service de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Besançon, France.

Thierry Moulin (T)

Université de Franche-Comté, INSERM, UMR 1322 LINC, Besançon, France.
Université de Franche-Comté, CHU Besançon, Service de Neurologie, Besançon, France.

Sylvie Nezelof (S)

Université de Franche-Comté, INSERM, UMR 1322 LINC, Besançon, France.
Université de Franche-Comté, CHU Besançon, Service de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Besançon, France.

Eloi Magnin (E)

Université de Franche-Comté, INSERM, UMR 1322 LINC, Besançon, France.
Université de Franche-Comté, CHU Besançon, Service de Neurologie, Besançon, France.

Renaud Jardri (R)

University of Lille, Inserm U1172, Centre Lille Neuroscience and Cognition, CHU Lille, Lille, France.

Lauriane Vulliez-Coady (L)

Université de Franche-Comté, INSERM, UMR 1322 LINC, Besançon, France.
Université de Franche-Comté, CHU Besançon, Service de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Besançon, France.

Classifications MeSH