Variations of the extrapsoas course of the lumbar plexus with implications for the lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: a cadaveric study.


Journal

Acta neurochirurgica
ISSN: 0942-0940
Titre abrégé: Acta Neurochir (Wien)
Pays: Austria
ID NLM: 0151000

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 11 02 2024
accepted: 24 07 2024
medline: 2 8 2024
pubmed: 2 8 2024
entrez: 2 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Together with an increased interest in minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine goes a demand for detailed anatomical descriptions of the lumbar plexus. Although definitions of safe zones and essential descriptions of topographical anatomy have been presented in several studies, the existing literature expects standard appearance of the neural structures. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the variability of the extrapsoas portion of the lumbar plexus in regard to the lateral transpsoas approach. A total of 260 lumbar regions from embalmed cadavers were utilized in this study. The specimens were dissected as per protocol and all nerves from the lumbar plexus were morphologically evaluated. The most common variation of the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves was fusion of these two nerves (9.6%). Nearly in the half of the cases (48.1%) the genitofemoral nerve left the psoas major muscle already divided into the femoral and genital branches. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was the least variable one as it resembled its normal morphology in 95.0% of cases. Regarding the variant origins of the femoral nerve, there was a low formation outside the psoas major muscle in 3.8% of cases. The obturator nerve was not variable at its emergence point but frequently branched (40.4%) before entering the obturator canal. In addition to the proper femoral and obturator nerves, accessory nerves were present in 12.3% and 9.2% of cases, respectively. Nerves of the lumbar plexus frequently show atypical anatomy outside the psoas major muscle. The presented study provides a compendious information source of the possibly encountered neural variations during retroperitoneal access to different segments of the lumbar spine.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Together with an increased interest in minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine goes a demand for detailed anatomical descriptions of the lumbar plexus. Although definitions of safe zones and essential descriptions of topographical anatomy have been presented in several studies, the existing literature expects standard appearance of the neural structures. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the variability of the extrapsoas portion of the lumbar plexus in regard to the lateral transpsoas approach.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 260 lumbar regions from embalmed cadavers were utilized in this study. The specimens were dissected as per protocol and all nerves from the lumbar plexus were morphologically evaluated.
RESULTS RESULTS
The most common variation of the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves was fusion of these two nerves (9.6%). Nearly in the half of the cases (48.1%) the genitofemoral nerve left the psoas major muscle already divided into the femoral and genital branches. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was the least variable one as it resembled its normal morphology in 95.0% of cases. Regarding the variant origins of the femoral nerve, there was a low formation outside the psoas major muscle in 3.8% of cases. The obturator nerve was not variable at its emergence point but frequently branched (40.4%) before entering the obturator canal. In addition to the proper femoral and obturator nerves, accessory nerves were present in 12.3% and 9.2% of cases, respectively.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Nerves of the lumbar plexus frequently show atypical anatomy outside the psoas major muscle. The presented study provides a compendious information source of the possibly encountered neural variations during retroperitoneal access to different segments of the lumbar spine.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39093448
doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06216-6
pii: 10.1007/s00701-024-06216-6
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

319

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Ahmadian A, Deukmedjian AR, Abel N, Dakwar E, Uribe JS (2013) Analysis of lumbar plexopathies and nerve injury after lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: diagnostic standardization. J Neurosurg Spine 18:289–297
doi: 10.3171/2012.11.SPINE12755 pubmed: 23259543
Anloaguae PA, Huijbregts P (2009) Anatomical variations of the lumbar plexus: a descriptive anatomy study with proposed clinical implications. J Manual Manipulative Med 17:E107–E114
Benglis DM, Vanni S, Levi AD (2009) An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 10:139–144
doi: 10.3171/2008.10.SPI08479 pubmed: 19278328
Dakwar E, Vale FL, Uribe JS (2011) Trajectory of the main sensory and motor branches of the lumbar plexus outside the psoas muscle related to the lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach. J Neurosurg Spine 14:290–295
doi: 10.3171/2010.10.SPINE10395 pubmed: 21214318
Davis TT, Bae HW, Mok JM, Rasouli A, Delamrter RB (2011) Lumbar plexus anatomy within the psoas muscle: implications for the transpsoas lateral approach to the L4–L5 disc. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1482–1487
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00962 pubmed: 22204003
Geh N, Schultz M, Yang L, Zeller J (2015) Retroperitoneal course of iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, and genitofemoral nerves: a study to improve identification and excision during triple neurectomy. Clin Anat 28:903–909
doi: 10.1002/ca.22592 pubmed: 26149241
Guerin P, Obeid I, Bourghli A, Masquefa T, Luc S, Gille O, Pointillart V, Vital JM (2012) The lumbosacral plexus: anatomic considerations for minimally invasive retroperitoneal transpsoas approach. Surg Radiol Anat 34:151–157
doi: 10.1007/s00276-011-0881-z pubmed: 21971645
Haladaj R, Wysiadecki G, Macchi V, de Caro R, Wojdyn M, Polguj M, Topol M (2018) Anatomic variations of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve: remnants of atypical nerve growth pathways revisited by intraneural fascicular dissection and a proposed classification. World Neurosurg 188:E687–E698
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.021
Iwanaga J, Simonds E, Schmacher M, Kikuta S, Watanabe K, Tubbs RS (2019) Revisiting the genital and femoral branches of the genitofemoral nerve: suggestion for a more accurate terminology. Clin Anat 32:458–463
doi: 10.1002/ca.23327 pubmed: 30592097
Klaassen Z, Marshall E, Tubbs RS, Louis RG Jr, Wartmann CT, Loukas M (2011) Anatomy of the ilioingunal and iliohypogastric nerves with observations of their spinal nerve contributions. Clin Anat 24:454–461
doi: 10.1002/ca.21098 pubmed: 21509811
Rab M, Ebmer J, Dellon AL (2001) Anatomic variability of the ilioinguinal and genitofemoral nerve: implications for the treatment of groin pain. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1618–1623
doi: 10.1097/00006534-200111000-00029 pubmed: 11711938
Tomaszewski KA, Popieluszko P, Henry BM, Roy J, Sanna B, Kijek MR, Walocha JA (2016) The surgical anatomy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve in the inguinal region: a meta-analysis. Hernia 20:649–657
doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1493-7 pubmed: 27115766 pmcid: 5023748
Turgut M, Protas M, Gardner B, Oskouian RJ, Loukas M, Tubbs RS (2017) The accessory obturator nerve: an anatomical study with literature analysis. Anat 11:121–127
doi: 10.2399/ana.17.043
Uribe JS, Arredondo N, Dakwar E, Vale FL (2010) Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study. J Neurosurg Spine 13:260–266
doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09766 pubmed: 20672964
Matejcik V (2010) Anatomical variations of lumbosacral plexus. Surg Radiol Anat 32:409–414
doi: 10.1007/s00276-009-0546-3 pubmed: 19696958
Standring S (2016) Gray’s Anatomy, 41st edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia
Walker CT, Farber SH, Cole TS, Xu DS, Godzik J, Whiting AC, Hartman C, Porter RW, Turner JD, Uribe J (2019) Complications for minimally invasive lateral interbody arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing prepsoas and transpsoas approaches. J Neurosurg Spine 30:446–460
doi: 10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18800 pubmed: 30684932
Webber RH (1961) Some variations in the lumbar plexus of nerves in man. Acta Anat 44:336–345
doi: 10.1159/000141731 pubmed: 13783591

Auteurs

Michal Benes (M)

Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Center for Endoscopic, Surgical and Clinical Anatomy (CESKA), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Michal Zido (M)

Center for Endoscopic, Surgical and Clinical Anatomy (CESKA), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Department of Neurology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

Petr Machac (P)

Center for Endoscopic, Surgical and Clinical Anatomy (CESKA), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Department of Traumatology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Radek Kaiser (R)

Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Center for Endoscopic, Surgical and Clinical Anatomy (CESKA), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Spinal Surgery Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Anhelina Khadanovich (A)

Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Center for Endoscopic, Surgical and Clinical Anatomy (CESKA), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Simona Nemcova (S)

Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Center for Endoscopic, Surgical and Clinical Anatomy (CESKA), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Vojtech Kunc (V)

Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Center for Endoscopic, Surgical and Clinical Anatomy (CESKA), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Research Centre, Faculty of Health Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti Nad Labem, Usti Nad Labem, Czech Republic.

David Kachlik (D)

Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. david.kachlik@lfmotol.cuni.cz.
Center for Endoscopic, Surgical and Clinical Anatomy (CESKA), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. david.kachlik@lfmotol.cuni.cz.
Department of Health Care Studies, College of Polytechnics, Jihlava, Czech Republic. david.kachlik@lfmotol.cuni.cz.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH