Quality of melatonin use in children and adolescents: findings from a UK clinical audit.


Journal

BMJ mental health
ISSN: 2755-9734
Titre abrégé: BMJ Ment Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918521385306676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 29 09 2023
accepted: 19 11 2023
medline: 2 8 2024
pubmed: 2 8 2024
entrez: 2 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Melatonin is commonly used to treat sleep disturbance in children and adolescents, although uncertainties about its optimal use remain. To determine to what extent prescribing of melatonin complies with evidence-based clinical practice standards. As part of a quality improvement programme, the Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health conducted a retrospective clinical audit in UK services for children and adolescents. Data were submitted for 4151 children and adolescents up to 18 years of age, treated with melatonin: 3053 (74%) had a diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorder. In 2655 (73%) of the 3651 patients prescribed melatonin to be taken regularly, the main reason was to reduce sleep latency (time taken to fall asleep). In 409 patients recently starting melatonin, a non-pharmacological intervention had already been tried in 279 (68%). The therapeutic response of patients early in treatment (n=899) and on long-term treatment (n=2353) had been assessed and quantified in 36% and 31%, respectively, while for review of side effects, the respective proportions were 46% and 43%. Planned treatment breaks were documented in 317 (13%) of those on long-term treatment. Melatonin was predominantly prescribed for evidence-based clinical indications, but the clinical review and monitoring of this treatment fell short of best practice. With limited methodical review of melatonin use in their patients, clinicians will fail to garner reliable information on its risks and benefits for individual patients. The lack of such practice-based evidence may increase the risk of melatonin being inappropriately targeted or continued despite being ineffective or no longer indicated.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Melatonin is commonly used to treat sleep disturbance in children and adolescents, although uncertainties about its optimal use remain.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To determine to what extent prescribing of melatonin complies with evidence-based clinical practice standards.
METHODS METHODS
As part of a quality improvement programme, the Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health conducted a retrospective clinical audit in UK services for children and adolescents.
FINDINGS RESULTS
Data were submitted for 4151 children and adolescents up to 18 years of age, treated with melatonin: 3053 (74%) had a diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorder. In 2655 (73%) of the 3651 patients prescribed melatonin to be taken regularly, the main reason was to reduce sleep latency (time taken to fall asleep). In 409 patients recently starting melatonin, a non-pharmacological intervention had already been tried in 279 (68%). The therapeutic response of patients early in treatment (n=899) and on long-term treatment (n=2353) had been assessed and quantified in 36% and 31%, respectively, while for review of side effects, the respective proportions were 46% and 43%. Planned treatment breaks were documented in 317 (13%) of those on long-term treatment.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Melatonin was predominantly prescribed for evidence-based clinical indications, but the clinical review and monitoring of this treatment fell short of best practice.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS CONCLUSIONS
With limited methodical review of melatonin use in their patients, clinicians will fail to garner reliable information on its risks and benefits for individual patients. The lack of such practice-based evidence may increase the risk of melatonin being inappropriately targeted or continued despite being ineffective or no longer indicated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39093720
pii: bmjment-2023-300894
doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300894
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Melatonin JL5DK93RCL
Central Nervous System Depressants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: CP, OR, AR, GB and TREB have no interests to declare. PG was CI on the NIHR investigator-led Mends RCT melatonin trial and the Neurim industry-led international RCT for Slenyto melatonin; reports participation in advisory panels for AGB, Flynn Pharma and Alturix; but reports no shares or ongoing work with any of the above. AL reports speaking and travel honoraria from Takeda and Flynn Pharma.

Auteurs

Carol Paton (C)

Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK Carol.Paton@nhs.net.
Division of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Paul Gringras (P)

Evelina London Children's Hospital, King's College London, London, UK.

Alice Ruan (A)

Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Ashley Liew (A)

Evelina London Children's Hospital, King's College London, London, UK.
National & Specialist CAMHS, South London and Maudsley Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

Olivia Rendora (O)

Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.

Gaia Bove (G)

Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.

Thomas R E Barnes (TRE)

Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.
Division of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH