Evaluation of COVID-19 rapid antigen test against polymerase chain reaction test in immunocompromised patients.
Humans
Middle Aged
Female
Immunocompromised Host
Male
Adult
COVID-19
/ diagnosis
SARS-CoV-2
/ immunology
Aged
Sensitivity and Specificity
Young Adult
Adolescent
Polymerase Chain Reaction
/ methods
COVID-19 Serological Testing
/ methods
Aged, 80 and over
Antigens, Viral
/ immunology
False Negative Reactions
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
30
12
2023
accepted:
14
06
2024
medline:
2
8
2024
pubmed:
2
8
2024
entrez:
2
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
On the 11th of March 2020, the world faced a new global pandemic, COVID-19 which is a disease caused by the novel coronavirus, it had multiple devastating outcomes on multiple sectors along with significant rates of mortality. These challenges encouraged the development of multiple testing methods, as well as anti-viral medications such as Molnupiravir, as well as evaluating the efficacy of available medications against it, like; Azithromycin, Ritonavir and Hydroxychloroquine. Vaccination against COVID-19 forged into a significant challenge, few months ensuing the first case of SARS-CoV-2, which was diagnosed in December 2019, in Wuhan-China, thus, multiple vaccines were approved for use around the world to combat this pandemic. Our study includes a sample of 556 oncology patients at Augusta Victoria Hospital in Jerusalem, all patients were tested using Panbio rapid antigen test and Allplex PCR Assay. The main objective was to study the sensitivity and specificity of Rapid antigen test, which contributes to a faster isolation call and management of infected patients, thus decreasing the risk on spread to other patients and health care. Patients were categorized based on two factors: Ct range and age group and studying their possible effect on false-negative results. Patients with Ct value less than 20, had the highest detection rate which is consistent with other studies in the literature. The sensitivity and specificity of Panbio Rapid Antigen testing were of 69.9% and 100%, respectively. A correlation between age group and false negative results could not be made, but a correlation between Ct value and false negative result was noticed, Ct value was directly related to false negative results. P-value of 0.007 indicated that results were statistically significant where PCR test is considered more sensitive compared to rapid antigen test.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39093858
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306396
pii: PONE-D-23-35555
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, Viral
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0306396Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2024 Sabateen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.